| Literature DB >> 31516347 |
Hamna Saleem1,2, Muhammad Arslan2,3, Khadeeja Rehman2, Razia Tahseen2, Muhammad Afzal2.
Abstract
Helophytic plants contribute significantly in phytoremediation of a variety of pollutants due to their physiological or biochemical mechanisms. Phenol, which is reported to have negative/deleterious effects on plant metabolism at concentrations higher than 500 mg/L, remains hard to be removed from the environmental compartments using conventional phytoremediation procedures. The present study aims to investigate the feasibility of using P. australis (a helophytic grass) in combination with three bacterial strains namely Acinetobacter lwofii ACRH76, Bacillus cereus LORH97, and Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90, in a floating treatment wetland (FTW) for the removal of phenol from contaminated water. The strains were screened based on their phenol degrading and plant growth promoting activities. We found that inoculated bacteria were able to colonize in the roots and shoots of P. australis, suggesting their potential role in the successful removal of phenol from the contaminated water. Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 dominated the bacterial community structure followed by A. lowfii ACRH76 and B. cereus LORH97. The removal rate was significantly high when compared with the individual partners, i.e., plants and bacteria separately. The plant biomass, which was drastically reduced in the presence of phenol, recovered significantly with the inoculation of bacterial consortia. Likewise, highest reduction in chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and total organic carbon (TOC) is achieved when both plants and bacteria were employed. The study, therefore, suggests that P. australis in combination with efficient bacteria can be a suitable choice to FTWs for phenol-degradation in water.Entities:
Keywords: Endophytic bacteria; Floating treatment wetlands; P. australis; Phenol; Plant-bacteria partnership; Rhizospheric
Year: 2018 PMID: 31516347 PMCID: PMC6733312 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.01.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Schematic representation of floating mat with holes for plantation of healthy seedlings of P. australis (A); construction of phytoreactors with container and floating mat (B-C); experimental setup showing plant biomass (C). The tanks were covered to avoid sunlight penetration.
Reed root and shoot biomass measured after 15 days of the experiment period.
| Treatments | Root biomass (g) | Shoot biomass (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | Dry | Fresh | Dry | |
| Vegetated (-phenol) | 181.1a (21.9) | 57.4a (4.1) | 963a (98) | 268a (34) |
| Vegetated and un-inoculated (+phenol) | 76.5b (7.2) | 22.9b (2.4) | 593b (53) | 124b (26) |
| Vegetated and inoculated (+phenol) | 159.7a (27.8) | 51.1ab (9.9) | 815ab (46) | 256a (39) |
Each value is a mean of three replicates; means in the same column followed by different letter are statistically different at 5% level of significance; standard deviations are presented in parentheses.
Effect of inoculum and vegetation on phenol removal.
| Treatments | Initial | 5 days | 10 days | 15 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 500 | 389.4a (26.6) | 347.7a (34.4) | 333.5a (23.8) |
| Inoculated | 500 | 327.7ab (24.2) | 293.3ab (23.1) | 194.6b (19.3) |
| Vegetated | 500 | 202.3b (29.3) | 188.1b (17.4) | 167bc (21.3) |
| Vegetated and Inoculated | 500 | 149.4bc (15.6) | 45.3c (11.3) | 19.3c (3.1) |
Each value is a mean of three replicates; means in the same column followed by different letter are statistically different at 5% level of significance; standard deviations are presented in parentheses.
Water quality parameters for the treated water at the end of experiment.
| Treatments | COD | BOD | pH | TOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1057a (45) | 423a (34) | 5.8b (0.0) | 359a (34) |
| Inoculated | 514b (25) | 281b (14) | 6.6ab (0.01) | 165b (15) |
| Vegetated | 476b (29) | 223b (22) | 6.7ab (0.01) | 172b (11) |
| Vegetated & Inoculated | 122c (7) | 78c (6) | 7.2a (0.01) | 53c (5) |
Each value is a mean of three replicates; means in the same column followed by different letter are statistically different at 5% level of significance; standard deviations are presented in parentheses.
Fig. 2Temporal assessment of dissolved oxygen for evaluating system’s performance.
Fig. 3Persistence of inoculated bacteria in the treated water, root interior, and shoot interior of T. domingensis.
Fig. 4The nMDS ordination of inoculated bacterial consortium based on RFLP profile.