Literature DB >> 18006399

Microstimulation at the bone-implant interface upregulates osteoclast activation pathways.

Vincent A Stadelmann1, Alexandre Terrier, Dominique P Pioletti.   

Abstract

Peri-implant bone resorption after total joint arthroplasty is a key parameter in aseptic loosening. Implant wear debris and biomechanical aspects have both been demonstrated to be part of the bone resorption process. However, neither of these two parameters has been clearly identified as the primary initiator of peri-implant bone resorption. For the biomechanical parameters, micromotions were measured at the bone-implant interface during normal gait cycles. The amplitude of the micromotions was shown to trigger differentiation of bone tissues. So far no data exists directly quantifying the effect of micromotion and compression on human bone. We hypothesize that micromotion and compression at the bone-implant interface may induce direct activation of bone resorption around the implant through osteoblasts-osteoclasts cell signaling in human bone. This hypothesis was tested with an ex vivo loading system developed to stimulate trabecular bone cores and mimic the micromotions arising at the bone-implant interface. Gene expression of RANKL, OPG, TGFB2, IFNG and CSF-1 was analyzed after no mechanical stimulation (control), exposure to compression or exposure to micromotions. We observed an 8-fold upregulation of RANKL after exposure to micromotions, and downregulation of OPG, IFNG and TGFB2. The RANKL:OPG ratio was upregulated 24-fold after micromotions. This suggests that the micromotions arising at the bone-implant interface during normal gait cycles induce a bone resorption response after only 1 h, which occurs before any wear debris particles enter the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006399     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.09.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  13 in total

1.  High pressure may inhibit periprosthetic osteogenesis.

Authors:  Kongzu Hu; Chengtao Wang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Biomechanics and tissue engineering.

Authors:  D P Pioletti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Eric Alexander Lewallen; Scott M Riester; Carolina A Bonin; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Amel Dudakovic; Sanjeev Kakar; Robert C Cohen; Jennifer J Westendorf; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Bisphosphonate-based strategies for bone tissue engineering and orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Cattalini; Aldo R Boccaccini; Silvia Lucangioli; Viviana Mouriño
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Mechanical regulation of bone formation and resorption around implants in a mouse model of osteopenic bone.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Duncan Betts; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Multi-patient finite element simulation of keeled versus pegged glenoid implant designs in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Werner Pomwenger; Karl Entacher; Herbert Resch; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Xiaomian Wu; Xiaochen Liu; Jie Wei; Jian Ma; Feng Deng; Shicheng Wei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-03-05

8.  Impregnation of bone chips with alendronate and cefazolin, combined with demineralized bone matrix: a bone chamber study in goats.

Authors:  Nina Mc Mathijssen; Gerjon Hannink; Peter Pilot; B Wim Schreurs; Rolf M Bloem; Pieter Buma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  The Effect of RANKL/OPG Balance on Reducing Implant Complications.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Kapasa; Peter V Giannoudis; Xiaodong Jia; Paul V Hatton; Xuebin B Yang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 10.  Preparation Methods for Improving PEEK's Bioactivity for Orthopedic and Dental Application: A Review.

Authors:  Davood Almasi; Nida Iqbal; Maliheh Sadeghi; Izman Sudin; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Tunku Kamarul
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2016-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.