Laia Alsina1, Elisabeth Israelsson2, Matthew C Altman2, Kristen K Dang2, Pegah Ghandil3, Laura Israel3, Horst von Bernuth4, Nicole Baldwin5, Huanying Qin5, Zongbo Jin5, Romain Banchereau5, Esperanza Anguiano5, Alexei Ionan5, Laurent Abel3, Anne Puel6, Capucine Picard7, Virginia Pascual5, Jean Laurent Casanova8, Damien Chaussabel9. 1. 1] Baylor Institute for Immunology Research and Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA. [2] Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. 1] Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM UMR 1163, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France. [2] Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. 4. 1] Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM UMR 1163, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France. [2] Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. [3] Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Hospital-Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. 5. Baylor Institute for Immunology Research and Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA. 6. 1] Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM UMR 1163, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France. [2] Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. [3] St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA. 7. 1] Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM UMR 1163, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France. [2] Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. [3] St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA. [4] Study Center of Primary Immunodeficiencies, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker Hospital, Paris, France. [5] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, USA. 8. 1] Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM UMR 1163, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France. [2] Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. [3] St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, USA. [5] Pediatric Hematology-Immunology Unit, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 9. 1] Baylor Institute for Immunology Research and Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA. [2] Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA. [3] Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract
Loss of function of the kinase IRAK4 or the adaptor MyD88 in humans interrupts a pathway critical for pathogen sensing and ignition of inflammation. However, patients with loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding these factors are, unexpectedly, susceptible to only a limited range of pathogens. We employed a systems approach to investigate transcriptome responses following in vitro exposure of patients' blood to agonists of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and receptors for interleukin 1 (IL-1Rs) and to whole pathogens. Responses to purified agonists were globally abolished, but variable residual responses were present following exposure to whole pathogens. Further delineation of the latter responses identified a narrow repertoire of transcriptional programs affected by loss of MyD88 function or IRAK4 function. Our work introduces the use of a systems approach for the global assessment of innate immune responses and the characterization of human primary immunodeficiencies.
Loss of function of the kinase IRAK4 or the adaptor MyD88 in humans interrupts a pathway critical for pathogen sensing and ignition of inflammation. However, patients with loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding these factors are, unexpectedly, susceptible to only a limited range of pathogens. We employed a systems approach to investigate transcriptome responses following in vitro exposure of patients' blood to agonists of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and receptors for interleukin 1 (IL-1Rs) and to whole pathogens. Responses to purified agonists were globally abolished, but variable residual responses were present following exposure to whole pathogens. Further delineation of the latter responses identified a narrow repertoire of transcriptional programs affected by loss of MyD88 function or IRAK4 function. Our work introduces the use of a systems approach for the global assessment of innate immune responses and the characterization of humanprimary immunodeficiencies.
Studies of children with recurrent invasive pneumococcal infection have led to
the discovery of two primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), caused by autosomal recessive
mutations in IRAK4 and MYD88, which impair Toll-like
and Interleukin 1 family Receptors (TIR) signaling[1, 2]. Toll-like receptors
(TLRs) act as sensors of the innate immune system by recognizing specific components
conserved among a variety of microorganisms that invade the host. The ligation of TLRs
by their agonists induces an inflammatory response to control the infection[3]. In humans 10 functional members of the
TLR family have been identified (TLR1-10). MyD88 is a key downstream adapter for most
interleukin-1 receptors (IL-1Rs) and all TLRs except for TLR3 and partially TLR4; IRAK-4
is selectively recruited to TLRs and IL-1Rs by MyD88[4-6]. Thus, loss of
IRAK-4 or MyD88 function interrupts a pathway critical for pathogen sensing (TLR) and
inflammation (IL-1R), known as TIR deficiency[7]. Indeed, animal models indicate that deficiency in either one of
the two molecules results in heightened susceptibility to a wide range of
pathogens[8]. Yet surprisingly
MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients display a narrow and transient infectious phenotype
mostly limited to Gram-positive bacteria, Streptococcus pneumoniae and
Staphylococcus aureus, and to Gram-negative bacteria,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in particular, and mostly from birth until
adolescence when the condition improves[8-10].The contrast between a broad and profound immunological phenotype and a narrow
and transient infectious phenotype in these patients is intriguing. When assessing
immune competency of patients with PIDs the choice of the panel of analytes used as
readout is crucial. Indeed, a normal response does not exclude the possibility of a
defect affecting a pathway that is not covered by the panel. Conversely, a defective
response detected using a given panel does not exclude the possibility of a conserved,
potentially redundant, response being present. Adopting systems-scale profiling
approaches as the readout can address such limitations. A commonly used systems approach
is ex-vivo blood transcriptome profiling. This approach has led to the
identification of novel therapeutic targets and the development of biomarker
signatures[11-15]. Subsequently the same approach was adopted to
investigate responses to vaccines[16, 17].We have developed here an unbiased approach to evaluate the transcriptional
profiles of blood cells from MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients in response to a broad
array of TLR- and IL-1R-agonists as well as whole pathogens (bacteria, virus, and
fungus). Our hypothesis was that MyD88- and IRAK-4-dependent and independent
immunological mechanisms of recognition of pathogens would be revealed in
vitro, which could contribute to understanding the in vivo
protection against most microbes in these patients. This approach allowed the assessment
of the range of responses that can be elicited in the absence of functional IRAK-4 or
MyD88 and provided insights into essential mechanisms for the maintenance of immunity to
pathogens.
RESULTS
In vitro transcriptome responses to purified TIR agonists
Before evaluating the impact of MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiencies on innate
immune function we set out to establish in a set of control subjects the
baseline response elicited by the engagement of purified TIR agonists We
measured transcriptional responses to TIR agonists in 14 control subjects on a
genome-wide scale. Whole blood was stimulated in vitro for 2
hours with an array of agonists spanning all TLRs (PAM3 (TLR1/2), PAM2 (TLR2/6),
Poly (I:C) (TLR3), LPS (TLR4), Flagellin (TLR5), 3M2 (TLR7), 3M13 (TLR8), R848
(TLR7/8), CpG-D19, CpG-C (TLR9), and IL-1Rs (IL-1β, IL-18, IL-33) along
with two positive controls, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and phorbol ester (PMA)
plus ionomycin. Transcripts displaying consistent differences in stimulated
expression levels across healthy control subjects were selected as described
earlier (in 2 and online Methods). This filter
identified sets of transcripts responding to each stimulation. They included a
number of known chemokines, cytokines, co-stimulatory molecules, antibacterial
peptides and transcription regulators involved in the TIR signaling
pathway[3, 5]. Pathway analysis confirmed that immune
cell trafficking and inflammatory response genes were significantly
over-represented across these gene lists (p<0. 0001) (Ingenuity pathway
analysis software, Ingenuity Systems, www.ingenuity.com), as well as
type I interferon (IFN) signaling for LPS, Poly (I:C), 3M13, 3M2 and R848
stimulations (p<0. 001). The magnitude of transcriptional changes varied for
each stimulus: LPS, R848 and TNF induced stronger responses (713, 535 and 550
probes, respectively) and PAM3, PAM2, 3M13, IL-1β and IL-18 lower
responses (101, 183, 80, 99 and 119 probes, respectively). Several transcripts
were found to be overlapping among stimuli. For instance, 70 annotated probes
(59 genes) were induced by all TLR agonists except Poly (I:C) (non-specific TLR3
ligand for which signaling is MyD88-independent) (Supplementary Fig. 1). CpG-A (D19),
CPG-C and IL-33 were weak inducers at this early time-point and these conditions
were not included in further analyses. This first step established the
in vitro blood transcriptional response to TIR agonists in
healthy individuals.
Characterizing responses in patients with TIR deficiency
Next we assessed the ability of IRAK-4- and MyD88-deficientpatients to
respond following engagement of TIRs by purified agonists. Our initial cohort
included 4 patients with IRAK-4 deficiency and 4 patients with MyD88 deficiency
(patients P1 to P4, Table 1). All
IRAK4 and MYD88 mutations were
loss-of-function[1, 2, 9]. All patients were asymptomatic and without any active
infectious process at the time of sample collection. They were aged 1–18
years. The responses to PMA + ionomycin (positive control) and Poly
(I:C) (non-specific TLR3 ligand for which signaling is MyD88-independent), were
conserved -- 92. 4% of transcripts responsive in healthy controls were
also found in patients. The response to LPS (partially MyD88-dependent) was
reduced but not abolished (40. 2% of healthy response). However, a
dramatic drop in the number of responsive transcripts was observed in both
IRAK-4- and MyD88-deficientpatients to PAM3 (TLR1/2 agonist; 8. 8% of
healthy response), PAM2 (TLR2/6 agonist; 6% of healthy response),
Flagellin (TLR5 agonist; 19. 7% of healthy response), 3M13 (TLR7
agonist;13. 8% of healthy response), 3M2 (TLR8 agonist; 16. 3%
of healthy response), R848 (TLR7/8 agonist; 3. 9% of healthy response),
IL-1β (IL-1R agonist; 19. 5% of healthy response) and IL-18
(IL-18R agonist; 23. 4% of healthy response). The extent of the defects
for each given stimulus was consistent across patients both quantitatively and
qualitatively (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2). When all
stimuli were considered together, clustering according to levels of
responsiveness across subjects resulted in a clear separation between
MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent signals (Fig. 1b). Conversely, clustering subjects across all stimuli
resulted as expected in a clear separation between patients and controls. No
differences in responsiveness were observed between MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient
patients. The residual levels of response (10–20%) observed for
IL-1β and Flagellin could be explained because the agonists used were
E. coli derived, and, despite adding polymyxin B to the
culture, minimal levels of LPS may be present, and thus, activation might have
occurred through TLR4 engagement. Indeed, this residual response was not
observed (<10%) when the agonists used were not produced in bacteria
(PAM2, PAM3, R848). In summary, whole genome transcriptional responses to
MyD88-dependent TIR agonists were nearly abolished in patients compared to
controls. This finding unequivocally demonstrates that the loss of signaling
downstream of TIRs resulting from MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiency remains
uncompensated in these patients.
Table 1
Patient information.
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3
IRAK4−/−
P11, 9 male, age
12yo; Mutation: 1188+520A>G/1189- 1G>T; Splice mutation;
on IVIGP21, 9 male, age 12yo; Mutation: E402X/E402X; Nonsense
mutation; on CotrimoxazoleP31, 9 male, age 18yo; Mutation: Q293X/BAC210N13del; Nonsense
mutation/large deletion; on CotrimoxazoleP49 female, age 14yo; Mutation:Q293X/Q293X; Nonsense mutation;
on Azythromycin and IVIG
MYD88−/−
Controls
14 (6 for bacterial stimulation)
5
8 (2 young children)
Stimulations
Toll-IL1R (PAM3, PAM2, PolyIC, Flagellin,
LPS, R848, CpGs, IL1R, IL18R) + TNFa + PMAiono +
4 HK bacteria1 for IRAK-4P3,
P4 and MyD88 P3, P4.
Toll-R (PAM2, PAM3, PolyIC, R848) +
PMAiono + 4HK bacteria1 + BCG + HSV + HK. CA all
patients
siblings. In blue, patients reanalyzed in different batches to include new
pathogen stimulations. IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin.
4 HK bacteria include 3 strains of heat killed S. pneumoniae
and S. aureus.
Figure 1
Blood transcriptional responses following in vitro exposure to
purified TLR or IL-1R agonists. (a) Changes in expression levels of
transcripts responsive to TIR agonists are represented on a heatmap. Blood from
healthy controls or patients was stimulated in vitro for 2
hours with TLR agonists and cytokines (batch 1); responsive transcripts were
arranged by rows via hierarchical clustering (1784, 500 and 237 for PMA
+ ionomycin, LPS and PAM2 stimulations, respectively), and individual
subjects by columns from left to right: healthy controls (n=14),
MYD88 patients
(n=4), IRAK4 patients
(n=4). Changes versus the non-stimulated condition are represented by a
color scale: red = up-regulated; blue = down-regulated; yellow
= no change. Bar graphs represent overall individual levels of
responsiveness relative to the average of controls: the number of responsive
probes in a given subject/average of differentially expressed probes in healthy
controls x100. Responses to 8 additional TIR agonists and TNF are presented
similarly in Supplementary Fig
2a. (b). The overall responsiveness of individual subjects along the
horizontal axis relative to the average of controls is shown across all TIR
ligand stimulations on a heatmap. Subjects and stimulations were grouped by
hierarchical clustering.
Responses to whole bacteria are only marginally impaired
To use a stimulus more akinto that experienced by patients during
infection, we exposed samples from 5 MyD88- and 3 IRAK-4-deficient patients with
whole heat-killed bacteria (Table 1). The
bacteria chosen in this assay were those IRAK-4- and MyD88-deficientpatients
are most susceptible to:S. pneumoniae and S.
aureus[9]. For
S. pneumoniae, 3 different strains were used, including a
less virulent non-encapsulated R6 strain. In controls, the magnitude of
transcriptional change varied according to the bacteria: S.
aureus (SAC) induced the lowest responses (354 transcripts),
compared to S. pneumoniae (1553, 865 and 1439 transcripts for
R11470, R8450 and R6 strains, respectively).Patients displayed substantial levels of transcriptional activity in
response to heat-killed bacteria (Fig. 2a,
2b). The response in MyD88-deficientpatients was consistently lower
than in IRAK-4-deficient patients (R11470: 63% versus 84% for
MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients respectively; R8450: 45% versus
99%; R6: 46% versus 89%; SAC: 47% versus
75%). This difference was not observed earlier when using purified TIR
agonists. Thus the evaluation of transcriptional response to bacterial pathogens
shows that, as opposed to what was observed using purified agonists to TIRs,
patients with MyD88 or IRAK-4 deficiency maintain the capacity to respond to
S. pneumoniae and S. aureus at the
transcriptional level (>50% on average; range 27% to
102% of healthy responses) through MyD88- and IRAK-4-independent
mechanisms, highlighting the redundancy of the microbial sensing system in blood
leukocytes. Furthermore, our findings suggest that patients with MyD88
deficiency could differ from those with IRAK-4 deficiency in their ability to
respond to Gram-positive bacteria (50% versus 87% of
transcriptional change compared to healthy controls respectively, on average for
all 4 bacterial stimulations).
Figure 2
Blood transcriptional responses following in vitro exposure to
whole bacteria. (a). Responsive transcripts in controls and
patients are represented on a heatmap for individual bacterial stimulations.
Blood from healthy controls or patients (batch 1 and 2) was stimulated
in vitro for 2 hours with three strains of heat-killed
S. pneumoniae (R11470, R8450, R6) as well as S.
aureus (SAC); responsive transcripts were arranged by rows via
hierarchical clustering, (330, 282, 264 and 101 for R11470, R8450, R6 and SAC
stimulations, respectively) and individual subjects by columns from left to
right: healthy controls, MyD88-deficient patients, IRAK-4-deficient patients.
Changes versus the non-stimulated condition are represented by a color scale:
red = up-regulated; blue = down-regulated; yellow = no
change. Bar graphs represent overall individual levels of responsiveness
relative to the average of controls: the number of responsive probes in a given
subject/average of differentially expressed probes in healthy controls x100.
(b) The overall responsiveness of individual subjects along the
horizontal axis relative to the average of controls is shown across all whole
bacteria stimulations on a heatmap. Subjects and stimulations were grouped by
hierarchical clustering.
Modular repertoire mapping of TIR transcriptome responses
We next sought to characterize the transcriptional programs affected by
loss of MyD88- and IRAK-4-dependent signaling. We employed a data mining
strategy that consists in mapping relationships among group of genes based on
similarities in expression patterns across a wide range of conditions. The
approach devised for the construction of such modular transcriptional
repertoires has been described in detail elsewhere[18] For this study a large gene
co-clustering network was constructed using responses to each stimulus across
all subjects as input datasets. Network analysis identified co-clustered gene
sets – also referred to as transcriptional modules. The resulting
collection of modules served as a framework for downstream data analysis and
interpretation. This data-driven process identified a repertoire consisting of
66 modules comprised of 1, 088 transcripts. Functional annotations were obtained
for each module (Supplementary
Table 1). In addition, modules were broadly categorized based on
their patterns of response in control subjects to the different TIR agonists and
bacteria (Fig. 3). Thus all 66 modules were
grouped into 7 clusters (C0 to C6). Clusters 0, 1, and 6 consist of modules
responsive to both TIR and bacteria. Cluster C6 is uniformly up-regulated upon
these stimulations and is mainly composed of inflammation-related modules,
including cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8), chemokines, NF-κB,
acute-phase response elements and neutrophil function and phagocytosis (Fig. 4, Table
2). Cluster C4 is composed of modules responsive to TIR agonists. For
instance, M5. 4 and M7. 2 were preferentially induced by LPS (TLR4), 3M2 or R848
(TLR8) and, to a lesser extent, Poly (I:C), and correspond to an IFN-related
inflammatory response that is not induced by Gram-positive bacteria. Bacterial
stimulations triggered a set of modules that were not induced by
pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) stimulation of individual TLRs, and
thus could be considered whole bacteria-specific (Cluster C5). The annotation of
C5 suggests a role in cell signaling (Fig.
4, Table 2). This indicates
that in blood cultures exposed to whole bacteria, receptors other than TIR are
engaged (possibly ITAM-DAP12-associated receptors[19] such as CD300, integrins, Fc Receptors
(FcRs) C-type lectins and complement), and pathways or transcription factors
other than NF-κB triggered (e. g. MAP Kinases, Protein kinase C,
phosphatidylinositol, basic-leucine zipper and NFAT transcription factors).
Figure 3
Modular transcriptome repertoire of whole blood responses to TIRs agonists and
Gram-positive bacteria stimulations. Whole genome transcriptional responses to
TIRs agonists and whole Gram-positive bacteria (columns) measured in healthy
control subjects were mapped against a modular repertoire composed of 66 sets of
co-clustered transcripts (rows). Spots represent the percent of module probes
that are up (red) or down (blue) regulated in a sample. The average
“modular activity” of healthy control subjects is shown.
Hierarchical clustering identified seven clusters (C0 to C6) of modules with
related expression pattern across conditions. C0, C1, and C6 contain modules
induced by both TIRs and bacteria stimulations, whereas C4 and C5 consist of
modules uniquely activated by TLRs or bacteria respectively. Cluster C3
contained modules that did not show a clear pattern of induction by either TIR
or bacterial stimulations.
Figure 4
Literature profiles of module clusters (C4, C5, C6). Accumenta Literature
Lab™ was used to obtain literature abstract terms association scores for
the modules in clusters C4, C5 and C6. Term associations suggest that C4 and C6
are functionally related to inflammation and that C5 is functionally related to
cell signaling. Association scores values ranging from 0 to 3 are shown on the
heatmaps, with 0 indicating that the term is not associated with the module
(white); and 3 indicating that the term is highly associated with the module
(dark green). The intensity of the color is proportional to the score. Modules
and terms are ordered by hierarchical clustering based on similarities in
patterns of term association.
Table 2
Functional annotation, and specificity, for each module cluster.
Module Cluster
Specificity
Transcriptional activity upon
stimulation
Functionality
C0
Common to TIR and bacterial
stimulations
downregulation
Cell differentiation, proliferation,
adhesion, and metabolism
C1
Common to TIR and bacterial
stimulations
Cell signaling, ubiquitination, cell
movement, type I IFN, and inflammation
C2
Poly (I:C) specific
Erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and
platelets
C3
up and downregulation
Inflammation, phagocytosis, apoptosis
C4
TIR specific
upregulation
Type I and II IFN, Inflammation, caspases,
and apoptosis
C5
Bacterial specific
Cell signaling
C6
Common to TIR and bacterial
stimulations
Inflammation
Impact of TIR deficiencies on the transcriptome repertoire
We next used this modular repertoire as a framework for dissecting the
transcriptional programs impacted by MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiencies. Circular
heatmaps[20] were
employed to represent residual patient responses for each TIR stimulation across
the 7 module clusters, where each circle represents a patient and each spoke
represents a module (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 3). As
was expected based on our earlier findings, patients were unable to mount a
response to MyD88-dependent purified TIR agonists for any of the modules
described above, including those found in clusters C4 and C6, which are
associated with inflammation (residual responses to PAM2 Fig. 5, bottom left; all others Supplementary Fig. 3). Residual
responses were observed to LPS stimulations (partially MyD88-dependent) with C6
modules (Inflammation) displaying overall well-conserved responses, in contrast
with C4 modules (Interferon), which displayed poor residual responses (Fig 5, bottom right). Next, IRAK-4- and
MyD88-deficientpatients’ responses to heat-killed bacteria were
analyzed in a similar fashion. The overall responses to all 4 heat-killed
bacteria were relatively well preserved (Fig
5). The most preserved modular responses to Gram-positive bacteria in
both MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients were: 1) M2. 11, which contains
IL1A, IL1B, TNF, CCL20, CCL3L1, CCL4L1 and CXCL1;
2) M5. 5, which contains IL8, IRAK2, CCL3L3, CXCL2, IL1RN,
PLAU and PTGS2; 3) M6. 6, which contains
CCRL2, CYP4B1, NRLP3, OSM, PTGS2, TAGAP; and 4) M8. 4,
which contains CCL3, CCL3L1, CCL4L2, NFKBIA, NLRP3 and
PLAUR. These 4 modules, all from cluster C6, displayed high
levels of up-regulation for all donors (>90% for controls and
IRAK-4-deficient patients, and >50% for MyD88-deficientpatients,
Fig. 6). This indicates that patients
were able to induce a pro-inflammatory program in response to S.
pneumoniae and S. aureus activation, probably
through the participation of other sensors, such as NLRP3-activators in the form
of inflammasome components, which are present in 2 of the 4 most preserved
modules.
Figure 5
Modular transcriptome repertoire mapping of patient residual responsiveness to
TIRs agonists and whole bacteria. For visualization purposes, circular heatmaps
were generated to represent the transcriptional modular activity of IRAK-4-
(outer rings) and MyD88- (inner rings) deficient patients with respect to
healthy controls in response to HK bacteria stimulations and TIRs agonists
(batch 1 and 2). The values plotted represent residual responsiveness relative
to the average of healthy subjects on a color scale ranging from −1
(saturated blue, intact module down-regulation) to +1 (saturated red,
intact module up-regulation). Values close to zero are shown in white or very
pale color. The cases where a value was missing are represented by a gray color.
The histogram values shown on the hub are the absolute value of the average
across patients of the normalized module scores (calculated above). Values shown
range between 0 and 1, where cases with values >1 have an asterisk above the
bar. Residual responses to 10 additional TIRs agonists and TNF are presented
similarly in Supplementary
Fig. 3.
Figure 6
Residual responsiveness following in vitro exposure to whole
bacteria for C6 modules. Box plot displays residual responsiveness of individual
patients relative to the average of healthy subjects following 2 hours
in vitro exposure to heat-killed S.
pneumoniae (R6 strain) and S. aureus (SAC). Red
dots = IRAK4 patients;
Blue triangles = MYD88
patients (batch 1 and 2). Modules represented here belong to cluster C6. Supplementary Fig. 4
shows residual responses to S. pneumoniae R11470 and R8450
strains.
Three modules display defective responsiveness to bacteria
Further examination of modular patterns of responsiveness to whole
bacteria conversely revealed impairment of specific transcriptional programs.
Indeed, residual levels of responsiveness among modules constituting cluster C6
diverged markedly (Fig. 5 top left corner,
Fig. 6). This heterogeneity was
observed both across modules and bacterial species or strains (Fig. 6, and Supplementary Fig. 4). However,
three modules, M4. 3, M4. 7, M6. 3, did present consistently low levels of
residual responsiveness across these conditions. Of the three modules,
responsiveness was most consistently impaired for M4. 3. Module M4. 3 is related
to NF-κB activation (contains NFKB1,
NFKB2, IRAK3), regulation
(SRC, TNIP1), apoptosis
(BIRC3, CFLAR,
DENND5A-activator of Rab39- IER5),
IL-1β and the inflammasome (CARD16 and
P2RX7). Responses to S. pneumoniae R6
strain were abolished in all but one IRAK-4-deficient patient for M4. 3 (Fig. 6a), who however, displayed a blunted
response when exposed to S. aureus (Fig. 6b), thus suggesting species- or strain-specific
fluctuations in pathogen susceptibility (responses to S.
pneumoniae strains R8450 and R11470 are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4). Overall
responses were also similarly blunted for module M6. 3, which includes
TNFAIP8, IRG1 and molecules related to
cell metabolism (ACSL1, PDE4B, RIN2). Of interest, IRG1
enhances macrophage bactericidal activity[21] and ACSL1 has recently been found to play a role as an
inflammatory mediator in LPS-stimulated macrophages[22]. M4. 7 is another module displaying
overall decreased responsiveness. Notably, mutation of NBN
(nibrin), which is one of the 9 genes constituting module M4. 7, causes Nijmegen
breakage syndrome, a DNA repair PID characterized by combined cellular and
humoral immunodeficiency with severe recurrent sinopulmonary infections causing
significant mortality in this patient population[23]. A single nucleotide polymorphism for
NFKBIE, another gene belonging to this same module, has
been associated with susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal diseases[24]. Finally, a third gene from
M4. 7, CLIC4, has been found to play an important role in
mediating innate resistance to bacterial infection in an animal model[25]. These module-specific defects
were observed again in a third set of samples (batch 3, Table 1), including blood drawn from 2 repeat
patients (IRAK4P5 and
MYD88 P4) and 2 new
patients (IRAK4P6 and
MYD88P7). This new set of
patients showed the same degree of preserved transcriptional activity in
response to heat-killed bacteria when compared with previous set of patients
(Supplementary Fig.
5), and when dissecting this response, again, all showed low residual
responsiveness for M4. 3, M4. 7 and M6. 3 (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Residual responses to viral, fungal and bacterial pathogens
Mice lacking IRAK-4 or MyD88 are susceptible to a wide range of
pathogens, which is in striking contrast with the narrow range of susceptibility
observed in humans with inborn errors in IRAK-4 or MyD88[8]. Thus we subsequently investigated
patterns of transcriptional response in these patients upon whole blood
stimulation with pathogens deficient mice but not humans a resusceptible
to[9]. Responses to
Heat-killed Candida albicans (HK. CA), Bacillus
Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV) were measured in
2 MyD88- and 2 IRAK-4-deficient patients, as well as 8 control subjects (batch
3, Table 1). Patients displayed
substantial levels of transcriptional activity in response to HK. CA with near
normal residual responsiveness observed in 3 of the 4 patients (Fig. 7a, left panel). In response to BCG stimulation
(Fig. 7a, middle panel),
MyD88-deficientpatients showed markedly deficient responses (<30%
globally) that affected all the inflammatory modules, while an IRAK-4 deficient
patient had preserved responsiveness both globally (90%) and at the
module level (Fig. 7b, middle panel) (data
could not be obtained for the second IRAK4patient). These observations could
not be attributed to prior BCG vaccination status (MyD88 P1: no vaccination,
MyD88 P2: vaccination, IRAK-4 P2: vaccination). Finally, both MyD88- and
IRAK-4-deficient patients showed globally defective transcriptional responses to
whole blood stimulation with HSV (<20% responses) (Fig. 7a, right panel). At the module level one single
inflammatory module, M7. 4, was selectively preserved upon HSV stimulation
(Fig. 7b, right panel). This module
contains molecules such as NFIL3 (E4BP4), related to macrophage, dendritic cell
and NK differentiation and function, that are required for antiviral
immunity[26], and MYC
and REL, related to NF-κB signaling. This finding suggests that while
TLR signaling to HSV is for the most part abolished, alternative pathways
involving NF-κB signaling may be preserved and contribute to maintain
resistance to this pathogen in MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficient patients.
Figure 7
Blood transcriptional responses following in vitro exposure to
Candida, BCG and HSV. (a). Responsive transcripts in 8 controls and
four patients (2 MYD88 and 2
IRAK4) are represented on
a heatmap for individual pathogen stimulations. Blood from healthy controls and
patients (batch 3) was stimulated in vitro for 2 hours with
heat-killed Candida albicans (HKCA), Bacillus
Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and herpes simplex virus (HSV); responsive
transcripts were arranged by rows via hierarchical clustering, (68, 108 and 97
for HKCA, BCG and HSV stimulations, respectively) and individual subjects by
columns from left to right: healthy controls, MyD88-deficient patients,
IRAK-4-deficient patients. Changes versus the non-stimulated condition are
represented by a color scale: red = upregulated; blue =
downregulated; yellow = no change. Bar graphs represent overall
individual levels of responsiveness relative to the average of controls: the
number of responsive probes in a given subject/average of differentially
expressed probes in healthy controls x100. (b) Box plot displays
residual responsiveness of individual patients
(2IRAK4 and 2
MYD88) relative to the
average of healthy subjects following 2 hours in vitro exposure
to HKCA, BCG and HSV. Red dots =
IRAK4 patients; Blue
triangles = MYD88
patients. Modules represented in the figure belong to the cluster C6.
In summary, the use of a systems approach revealed a multifaceted
pattern of innate immune responsiveness in patients with MyD88 or IRAK-4
deficiencies. Our results demonstrate a profound defect in the ability of blood
leukocytes from MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients to respond to pathogen- and
host-derived TIR agonists. Responses to specific TIR agonists were completely
abrogated, while responses to whole organisms ranged from being relatively
normal (HK. CA) to dramatically reduced (HSV). Differences in levels of
responsiveness between MyD88- and IRAK-4- deficient subjects were also observed
for several conditions. Transcriptional programs elicited by pyogenic bacteria
to which both groups are clinically susceptible were not associated with a
dramatic reduction in overall responsiveness, but rather impairment of specific
inflammatory transcriptional programs.
DISCUSSION
We have devised a systems approach for the assessment of TIR and
antibacterial immunity inpatients with increased susceptibility to infection. The
distinct benefit of using a genome-wide approach is that it provides an unbiased
means to interrogate responses to innate immune stimuli as opposed to more
traditional approaches that require relying on a priori knowledge
to select a small panel of analytes as readout[1, 2, 27]. Here we assessed the global impact of
defects in IRAK-4 and MyD88 on innate immune transcriptional programs.
Patients’ responses to TLR2 agonists were less than 10% of healthy
subjects. TLR2 is known to be crucial for Gram-positive bacteria recognition
(S. pneumoniae[28] and S. aureus[29]), which are pathogens to which IRAK-4- and
MyD88-deficientpatients are most susceptible.We have confirmed the close dependence between IRAK-4 and MyD88 molecules in
the signaling pathway downstream of TIR, concordant with the functional structure
they form known as the Myddosome[6].
However, stimulation with whole pathogens, as opposed to purified TIR agonists,
revealed differences in IRAK-4 and MyD88 deficient patient’s ability to
mount transcriptional responses. This might be explained considering that MyD88
protein is involved in Ras/MAPK signaling pathway through direct interaction with
ERK without IRAK participation[30].
Nevertheless, these differences do not translate into cytokine production, which has
been shown equally impaired [1, 2, 27], nor in the infectious clinical phenotype, which is
indistinguishable[8-10].Despite the profound defect in the common TIR signaling pathway, IRAK-4- and
MyD88-deficientpatients were able to up-regulate major inflammatory modules
(modules M2. 11, M5. 5, M8. 4, M6. 6) when their blood was exposed to S.
pneumoniae and S. aureus. This indicates that a
MyD88-independent, but NF-κB- and MAPK-dependent pathway would be
responsible for this proinflammatory response since the same inflammatory program is
observed with specific TIR stimulation[28, 31]. S.
aureus and S. pneumoniae can be recognized by
NOD2[32] and TNFR1[33], both of which are expressed in
leukocytes, activate NF-κB and MAPKs, initiating the same inflammatory
processes as TLRs[34], and they do
not signal via MyD88. There is consistent evidence that both TLRs and NOD2 receptors
synergize to induce combined responses[35]. The lack of synergism with TLR2 might explain the suboptimal
response observed (lack of up-regulation of M4. 3, M4. 7, M6. 3). Those results are
consistent with previously reported data obtained at the protein level: TNFα
secretion in whole blood from IRAK-4patients was undetectable 24h after TLR
stimulation, but detectable upon heat-killed Staphylococcus
stimulation, although to a lower extent compared to healthy controls[1]. The residual induction of cytokines
via MyD88/IRAK-4-independent signaling pathways may account for both the resistance
to other infections and the fever/inflammation that can be observed at late stages
of infection.These results raise an important question: can the susceptibility to
bacteria in TIR deficiencies be ascribed to this partially defective inflammatory
response, or other mechanisms contribute to the phenotype? Our assay only evaluated
responses in whole blood, and not in mucosae or skin[36]. IL-1Ris crucial to maintain protective
immunity against invasive staphylococcal skin infection[37]. Indeed neutrophils play a key role in
bacterial clearance of epithelial sites[38] and IL-1R-mediated signaling by resident skin cells would
be essential for adequate neutrophil recruitment to the site of infection. We
previously published that skin-derived fibroblasts from both IRAK-4- and
MyD88-deficientpatients showed no response to IL-1R activation[2]. Also, IL-1R has proven crucial in other
S. aureus infections[39, 40]. It might be
that IRAK-4- and MyD88-deficientpatients are able to generate an initial
proinflammatory response upon initial encounter with Gram-positive bacteria in whole
blood, as we show, but presumably at epithelial sites as well (NOD2 expression has
been described in keratinocytes and the lung[41]; TNFR1 is widely distributed on the airway
epithelium[33]).
Nevertheless, defective IL1-R signaling could result in an impaired systemic
amplification of this initial response, ultimately increasing the risk of not only
epithelial infections, but also bacteremia starting from skin and mucosa, which is
characteristic of these patients. This would also explain why IRAK-4-and
MyD88-deficientpatients are clinical phenocopies despite different degrees of
response to whole bacteria in blood, since they display similar levels of defect to
IL-1β stimulation.MyD88-deficientpatients showed marked impairment in transcriptional
responses to whole blood activation with BCG, despite prior BCG vaccination. These
results are consistent with the strong TLR2 agonist activity to BCG in
mice[42]. However,
MyD88-deficientpatients are not susceptible to mycobacteria nor to, BCG [9]. In humans resistance to BCG is
known to be dependent on IFN-γ and its production is likely to be preserved
through MyD88-and IRAK-4-independent pathways, [43]. Similarly, while the abnormal responses to HSV observed in
both in MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients attest to the role of TLR2 and TLR9 in
the initiation of immune responses to HSV[44], it does not result in increased susceptibility to this
pathogen. Earlier work from our group demonstrated that HSV control in the central
nervous system is exquisitely dependent on a functional TLR3-pathway in neurons and
oligodendrocytes but not in blood leukocytes[45].Technologies available for profiling transcript abundance on a genome-wide
scale have become robust and cost-effective[46]. Its application in whole blood has been used extensively
for the investigation of disease pathogenesis, identification of biomarkers, and
assessment of responses to vaccines[16,
17]. However, molecular
phenotypes may not always be apparent in ex vivo blood profiled at
the steady state, as is the case in patients with MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiencies
(data not shown). We show here that using global profiling as readout in an
in vitro functional assay can produce comprehensive innate
immune phenotypes in patients with PID. Possible clinical applications for a
targeted assay derived from the modular transcriptional framework constructed in
this study can be foreseen beyond PID, in clinical settings where defects in innate
immunity are suspected, such as recurrent pyogenic infections[47] or aging[48], and also for the prediction of responses to
vaccines[16, 17]. The choice of conditions for the in
vitro stimulations is obviously critical; here we selected a panel
tailored for inborn errors in TIR pathway. This can be adapted depending on the
population being screened.In conclusion, this work demonstrates the use of systems approaches as a
robust means for the global assessment of innate immune competence. Applied to the
study of patients with inborn defects of TIR signaling, this strategy revealed that
patients with MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiencies suffer from a profound loss of
responsiveness to soluble TIR agonists and that their ability to respond to whole
bacteria is selectively impacted. Such findings are consistent with the delayed
clinical and biological signs of inflammation observed in those patients during the
course of infection[1, 2, 9, 29]. More broadly by lever aging high
throughput profiling technology together with an effective analytic framework, this
work also opens new avenues for the widespread use of systems approaches as a global
readout in functional immunological assays.
Online METHODS
1. Patient information and sample collection
A total of 40 blood samples were collected from three groups of
subjects: 7 patients with complete MyD88 deficiency, 6 patients with complete
IRAK-4 deficiency, and 27 healthy donors (Table
1). IRAK4 mutations from P1, P2, and P3 are null (no
IRAK-4 protein detected[27]).
Mutations from IRAK-4- P4, P5 and P6[9], and MyD88- patients 1 to 7 are loss-of-function. MyD88- P1
and P2 have normal levels of non-functional MyD88 protein; MyD88- P3-P7 and
IRAK-4- P4 and P5 have small amounts of non-functional protein[2]. Subjects were recruited in four
different sets: the first set included 4 healthy controls, MyD88- P1 and P2,
IRAK-4- P1 and P2. The second set included 10 different healthy controls,
MyD88-P3 and P4 and IRAK-4-P3 and P4. First and second set (batch 1) were
analyzed to evaluate patients’ responses to 13 different TIR agonists
(10 TLR agonists, 3 IL1-R agonists. A third set (batch 2) was included
afterwards to increase the number of MyD88- and IRAK-4-deficient patients for
bacterial stimulations (3 strains of heat killed S. pneumoniae
and S. aureus); batch 2 included 5 new healthy controls, MyD88-
P5 and P6, new samples from MyD88-P1, and IRAK-4-P5. Four patients from batch 1
and four from batch 2 were analyzed to evaluate TIR patients’ responses
to bacteria. The fourth set (batch 3) was included to test for alternative
pathogens stimulations (1 new IRAK-4-P6, 1 new MyD88-P7 patient, new samples
from IRAK-4-P5 and MyD88-P4, and 8 new healthy controls). Data on patient
antimicrobial prophylaxis at the time of blood drawn is detailed in Table 1.Healthy individuals were considered so based on past medical history (no
recurrent infections) and current health status. All healthy controls were adult
subjects except for batch 3, which included 2 healthy young children age 3 and 7
years-old. Indeed, Toll-like receptor function is mainly age dependent for the
newborn[49], and there
was an evident limitation in obtaining the required high volume of blood from
healthy children to use as controls. Blood samples were obtained at Necker
Hospital, Paris, France, with approval of the local Research Ethics Committee.
All participants aged 18 or their legal tutors gave written informed
consent.
2. Blood culture
Peripheral blood was drawn into sodium heparin vacuum tubes on clinic
site (Necker Hospital, Paris). Immediately, 500μl whole blood (WB) was
diluted with equal amount of RPMI before adding different stimulus, each
experimental condition was performed in replicates. Diluted WB was activated for
2 hours with 10μg/ml of polymyxin B to clear LPS contamination plus a
wide range of agonists Pam3CSK4 (TLR1/2; 100 ng/ml, InvivoGen®);
Pam2CSK4 (TLR2/6; 100 ng/ml, InvivoGen®); poly(I:C) (TLR3; 25
μg/ml, InvivoGen®); LPS (TLR4; 100ng/ml, Sigma®);
Flagellin (TLR5; 100 ng/ml, InvivoGen®); 3M-13 (TLR7; 3μg/ml, 3M
pharmaceuticals®); 3M-2 (TLR8; 3μg/ml, 3M
pharmaceuticals®); R848 (TLR7/8; 3μg/ml, InvivoGen®);
CpG-D19 and CpG-C (TLR9; 3μg/ml, from collaborator);IL1B (IL-1R;
20ng/ml, R&D systems®); IL-18 (IL-1R; 50ng/ml, R&D
systems®); IL-33 (IL-1R; 50ng/ml, R&D systems®); TNF (TNFR;
20ng/ml, R&D systems®); PMA (25 ng/ml, Sigma®) +
Ionomycin (1μg/ml, Sigma®); 3 heat-killed pneumococcal strains
(R6, 5.106 particle/ml; R8450 108 particle/ml; R11470,
5.106 particle/ml, heat-killed at 65°C for 15 min, from
collaborator), and heat-killed Staphylococcus aureus
(107 particle/ml, InvivoGen®); HSV-1, strain KOS-1 (MOI
1:1); live BCG (M. bovisBCG, Pasteurj sub-strain at an MOI of 20
BCG/leukocytes); HK Candida albicans (1.106 particules/ml, InvivoGen®),
or left unstimulated for 2h. After stimulation, WB was lysed with Tempus
solution (from Tempus tubes, Applied Biosystems) to stabilize the RNA at 1:3
ratio after stimulation. The lysates were kept at −80°C until
mRNA extraction.
3. RNA extraction and processing for microarray analysis
Total RNA was isolated from WB lysate using Tempus MagMAX-96 Blood RNA
isolation kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion). RNA quality and quantity were
assessed using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and NanoDrop 1000
(NanoDrop Products, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples with RNA integrity
numbers values >6 were retained for further processing. Globin mRNA was
depleted using the GLOBIN clear™ (Applied Biosystems/Ambion).
Globin-reduced RNA was amplified and labeled using the Illumina Total Prep-96
RNA Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion). This process was performed in
3 different batches (batch 1, 2, and 3, Table
1). Biotin-labeled cRNA was hybridized overnight to Human HT-12 V4
BeadChip arrays (IIlumina), which contains 47,231 probes, and scanned on an
Illumina BeadStation 500 (batch 1), iScan (batch 2), or HiScan (batch 3) to
generate signal intensity values.
4. Microarray data analysis
To reduce the potential batch effect between the sets, the background
subtracted raw signal values, extracted with Illumina Beadstudio (version 2),
were processed using ComBat[50].
The data was then quantile normalized and the minimum intensity was set to 10.
These data are available at GEO Series accession number GSE25742. Only the
probes called present in at least 10% of the samples (p<0.01) were
retained for downstream analysis (n=19,152). Transcripts differentially
regulated upon stimulation were defined based on a minimum 1.5-fold change (up-
or down-regulation) and a minimum absolute raw intensity difference of 150 with
respect to the respective unstimulated sample. Probes passing these filters in
at least 75% of healthy control samples were considered substantially
affected by stimulation, and were used in Fig.
1, 2,5, 7, Supplementary Fig.2, 3,
5online). No explicit statistical test of differential expression was
performed. The “percent of healthy response” quantifies the
number of probes changed in the patients compared to the healthy controls. It is
calculated as the number of stimulation-affected probes divided by the average
number of stimulation-affected probes in the healthy control samples for the
same stimulus. Red/white plots (Fig. 1b,
2b) represent the normalized probe counts (number of probes
passing the cutoffs for samples divided by number of probes passing the cut-offs
for 75% of controls) for each subject-stimulation pair.
5. Module construction
Clustering of probes into co-expressed modules
We generated sets of co-expressed probes as described
previously[21], with
variations as follows. The data used for clustering includes 10 healthy
control and 4 patient samples (2 MyD88- and 2 IRAK-4-deficient) for 19
stimulations (all TLR + IL-1R, TNF and 4 bacteria), available as GEO
Series GSE25742. The raw expression data was background-subtracted and
average-normalized before clustering. Only probes having at least a 1.5-fold
change and ±100 difference compared to their matched non-stimulated
sample for all stimulations were clustered. To improve clustering
efficiency, the expression values of the selected probes were first
converted into trinary values (e.g. −1, 0, 1) as follows: for cases
where the absolute difference is <100 or the absolute value of the
log2 fold change was < 0.585, then the signal was
considered to be unchanged, and was set to 0. Otherwise, the signal was set
to 1 if it is greater than the baseline and −1 if it was smaller
than the baseline. Next, within the samples for each stimulus, a group
reduction was performed such that for each probe, each group of samples
(healthy, MyD88-/-, IRAK-4-/-) was replaced by a single value that indicated
whether the trinary signal was consistent within 75% of the samples
of the group. This yielded three trinary values (one per group) per probe.
We clustered the group-reduced trinary probe values separately for each
stimulus by grouping probes with the same pattern of values, creating as
many clusters as necessary for all probes to be included in a cluster. The
clusters were then used as input for our module extraction algorithm. The
extraction required that the maximal clique used as the seed of a module
contained at least ten probes. We did not use paraclique to expand the
module. When completed, fourteen rounds of modules were produced, the number
corresponding to the number of input clustered datasets. A total of 66
modules were obtained composed of 1088 transcripts.
Analysis of module-level data
Module activity was calculated as the differences between the
percent of up-regulated and down-regulated probes (Fig. 3). To compare the module response of patient
samples to healthy controls, we calculated a “residual
response” value which is the per-patient module score divided by the
mean of the healthy controls module score for each stimulus. Module scores
for any stimuli with a healthy control absolute value mean score <
10% were considered not detected, so residual responses were not
computed for these modules (shown in gray in (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig.3 online). For cases where healthy
controls’ mean scores and an individual patient’s scores
were of opposite signs, the residual response was set to zero. Circular heat
map plots were generated using Circos[20].
Functional annotation of modules
Acumenta Literature Lab™ was used to associate each probe
within a particular module to terms in PubMed abstracts. Association scores
reflecting the strength of the associations were used in heat maps and to
calculate “cumulative LitLab Scores”. The terms that showed
a strong association with a module were used to create the functional
annotation. Gene networks for each module were created, using
“direct interactions” in GeneGo MetaCore™ (version
6.10). Modules were annotated using the network processes that were
indicated for each module. The final annotations are a summary of Acumenta
Literature Lab™ and GeneGo MetaCore™. In the cases where no
terms had a strong association to a module and the gene networks were
inconclusive, the modules were left un-annotated (14 out of 66 modules)
(Table 2, Supplementary Table 1 online).
The association scores obtained from Acumenta Literature Lab™ were
plotted in heat maps (Fig. 4).
Authors: Matthew P R Berry; Christine M Graham; Finlay W McNab; Zhaohui Xu; Susannah A A Bloch; Tolu Oni; Katalin A Wilkinson; Romain Banchereau; Jason Skinner; Robert J Wilkinson; Charles Quinn; Derek Blankenship; Ranju Dhawan; John J Cush; Asuncion Mejias; Octavio Ramilo; Onn M Kon; Virginia Pascual; Jacques Banchereau; Damien Chaussabel; Anne O'Garra Journal: Nature Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Cheng-Lung Ku; Horst von Bernuth; Capucine Picard; Shen-Ying Zhang; Huey-Hsuan Chang; Kun Yang; Maya Chrabieh; Andrew C Issekutz; Coleen K Cunningham; John Gallin; Steven M Holland; Chaim Roifman; Stephan Ehl; Joanne Smart; Mimi Tang; Franck J Barrat; Ofer Levy; Douglas McDonald; Noorbibi K Day-Good; Richard Miller; Hidetoshi Takada; Toshiro Hara; Sami Al-Hajjar; Abdulaziz Al-Ghonaium; David Speert; Damien Sanlaville; Xiaoxia Li; Frédéric Geissmann; Eric Vivier; László Maródi; Ben-Zion Garty; Helen Chapel; Carlos Rodriguez-Gallego; Xavier Bossuyt; Laurent Abel; Anne Puel; Jean-Laurent Casanova Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Elisabeth Israelsson; Damien Chaussabel; Rebecca S B Fischer; Heather C Moore; D Ashley Robinson; Jesse W Dunkle; Heather T Essigmann; Sharron Record; Eric L Brown Journal: Microbes Infect Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 2.700
Authors: Franz Kratochvill; Geoffrey Neale; Jessica M Haverkamp; Lee-Ann Van de Velde; Amber M Smith; Daisuke Kawauchi; Justina McEvoy; Martine F Roussel; Michael A Dyer; Joseph E Qualls; Peter J Murray Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 9.423