Literature DB >> 25342214

Variability in normal myocardial blood flow measurements: physiologic, methodologic, or protocol related?

Timothy M Bateman1, James A Case.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25342214     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-014-0007-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  29 in total

1.  Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Hoshang Farhad; Vincent Dunet; Kim Bachelard; Gilles Allenbach; Philipp A Kaufmann; John O Prior
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.

Authors:  John O Prior; Gilles Allenbach; Ines Valenta; Marek Kosinski; Cyrill Burger; Francis R Verdun; Angelika Bischof Delaloye; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Incremental diagnostic value of regional myocardial blood flow quantification over relative perfusion imaging with generator-produced rubidium-82 PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Chietsugu Katoh; Osamu Manabe; Ran Klein; Masanao Naya; Mamoru Sakakibara; Shiro Yamada; Robert A Dekemp; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.993

4.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

5.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Patrick T Siegrist; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli; Rob S Beanlands; Michael E Merhige; Brent A Williams; Emir Veledar; Benjamin J W Chow; James K Min; Michael J Pencina; Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Uchechukwu K Sampson; Sharmila Dorbala; Atul Limaye; Raymond Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 24.094
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Measurement of MBF by PET is ready for prime time as an integral part of clinical reports in diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD : For prime time not yet: Need impact and certainty.

Authors:  Heinrich Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Myocardial blood flow quantification by Rb-82 cardiac PET/CT: A detailed reproducibility study between two semi-automatic analysis programs.

Authors:  Vincent Dunet; Ran Klein; Gilles Allenbach; Jennifer Renaud; Robert A deKemp; John O Prior
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.952
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.