Literature DB >> 17349884

Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease.

Uchechukwu K Sampson1, Sharmila Dorbala, Atul Limaye, Raymond Kwong, Marcelo F Di Carli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Hybrid PET-CT is a new noninvasive imaging modality for evaluating patients with known or suspected CAD.
METHODS: We evaluated 64 consecutive patients with suspected CAD undergoing rest-stress rubidium-82 cardiac PET-CT (CT was only used for attenuation correction) and coronary angiography within 7 days (range 1 to 180 days). Patients with known CAD, previous myocardial infarction, or revascularization were excluded. Thirty-eight patients with a low likelihood for CAD were also studied. Obstructive CAD was defined as > or =70% diameter stenosis on angiography.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62 +/- 15 years, with a body mass index of 31 +/- 8 kg/m2. Chest pain and/or dyspnea were the predominant reasons for evaluation. Stress perfusion defects were detected in 41 of 44 patients with obstructive CAD (sensitivity 93%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 87 to 99). The specificity of PET-CT was 83% (48 of 58, 95% CI 71 to 91), and its overall diagnostic accuracy was 87% (95% CI 79 to 93). All patients with a low likelihood for CAD showed normal scans, for a normalcy rate of 100% (38 of 38, 95% CI 91 to 100). The sensitivity for detecting CAD in patients with single and multivessel (> or =2 vessels) disease was 92% (22 of 24, 95% CI 74 to 99) and 95% (19 of 20, 95% CI 74 to 99), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial perfusion PET-CT affords high sensitivity and overall accuracy for detecting CAD, including patients with single-vessel disease, women, and obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349884     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  74 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: past, present and future.

Authors:  A Notghi; C S Low
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Con.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Pro.

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; George Youssef
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Quantitative myocardial blood flow with Rubidium-82 PET: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Christoffer E Hagemann; Adam A Ghotbi; Andreas Kjær; Philip Hasbak
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-12

Review 7.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Non-invasive functional assessment using computed tomography: when will they be ready for clinical use?

Authors:  Yeonyee E Yoon; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

9.  Implementation of a cardiac PET stress program: comparison of outcomes to the preceding SPECT era.

Authors:  Stacey Knight; David B Min; Viet T Le; Kent G Meredith; Ritesh Dhar; Santanu Biswas; Kurt R Jensen; Steven M Mason; Jon-David Ethington; Donald L Lappe; Joseph B Muhlestein; Jeffrey L Anderson; Kirk U Knowlton
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-05-03

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Federico E Mordini; Tariq Haddad; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Tracy B Lowrey; Anthony H Aletras; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.