| Literature DB >> 25339204 |
A W M van der Graaf1, P Bhagirath, S Ghoerbien, M J W Götte.
Abstract
In recent years, the clinical importance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has increased dramatically. As a consequence, more clinicians need to become familiar with this imaging modality, including its technical challenges. MR images are obtained through a physical process of proton excitation and the reception of resonating signals. Besides these physical principles, the motion of the heart and diaphragm, together with the presence of fast flowing blood in the vicinity, pose challenges to the acquisition of high-quality diagnostic images and are an important cause of image artefacts. Artefacts may render images non-diagnostic and measurements unreliable, and most artefacts can only be corrected during the acquisition itself. Hence, timely and accurate recognition of the type of artefact is crucial. This paper provides a concise description of the CMR acquisition process and the underlying MR physics for clinical cardiologists and trainees. Frequently observed CMR artefacts are illustrated and possible adjustments to minimise or eliminate these artefacts are explained.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25339204 PMCID: PMC4391189 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-014-0623-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neth Heart J ISSN: 1568-5888 Impact factor: 2.380
Characteristics of common CMR artefacts
| Artefact | Reason | Appearance | Solution | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Aliasing | Field of view (FOV) does not enclose all body parts | Region outside FOV is projected on other side of the image | - Increase FOV / use oversampling in phase encoding direction | - Increased scan duration |
| - Swap phase and frequency direction | - Possible aliasing | |||
| - Apply saturation band on body part that is projected | - Slightly increased scan duration | |||
| 1.1. Parallel imaging | Undersampling | Region outside FOV is projected in the image | - Decrease parallel imaging factor - Increase FOV | - Increased scan duration - Increased scan duration |
| 1.2. Aliasing in flow sequence | Velocity encoded on the scanner (VENC) does not match the true velocity in the vessel | Dark region (black holes) inside vessel in flow series | - Increase or decrease the VENC | - No penalty |
| 2.1 Motion: Ghosting | - Respiratory motion - Movement / pulsation | Parallel lines or contours | - Breath-hold instruction / practice with patient - Breath-hold on inspiration / expiration? | - No penalty - Degree of inspiration is more variable |
| - Use single-shot imaging | - Reduced image quality | |||
| - Decrease spatial resolution | - Reduced image quality | |||
| - Navigator-gated | - Increased scan duration | |||
| - Real-time acquisition | - Increased scan duration, reduced image quality | |||
| - Swap phase and frequency direction | - No penalty | |||
| - Apply saturation band on body part that is projected | - Increased scan duration | |||
| 2.2 Motion: Trigger | - Poor ECG signal - Arrhythmia | Blurry myocardial borders | - Optimize ECG signal / check electrode position | - No penalty |
| - Use single-shot imaging | - Decreased spatial resolution | |||
| - Select arrhythmia rejection on scanner | - Increased scan duration | |||
| - Prospective triggering | - Incomplete imaging of heart cycle | |||
| - Real-time acquisition | - Increased scan duration, reduced image quality | |||
| 3. Blood flow | Nearby flowing protons disturb local magnetic field | Flow-related distortion of specific region | - Shimming - Reduce repetition time/echo time - Apply saturation band - Swap phase and frequency direction - Adjust slice selection | - No penalty - No penalty - Slightly increased scan duration - Possible aliasing - No penalty |
| 4. Radiofrequency (RF) | Interference of an external RF source with the MR magnetic field | Regular striped pattern across all images | - Remove RF source - Close door MR room | - No penalty - No penalty |
| 5. Chemical shift | Different resonance frequencies of water and fat protons in one voxel | Signal void at anatomic intersections | - Increase bandwidth (increase slice thickness) - Apply fat suppression | - Decreased spatial resolution - Increased scan duration |
| 6. Dark rim | Difference in high and low signal causes signal void | Dark (sub)endocardial ring | - Increase spatial resolution | - Increased scan duration |
| 7. Inhomogeneity | Dephasing of spins | Signal void or circles/blooming | - Shimming - Use (fast) spin echo instead of gradient echo - Apply saturation band on implant | - No penalty - Increased scan duration - Slightly increased scan duration and SAR |
Fig. 1Steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine images can be used for function analysis. Four-chamber view with signal averaging of the aorta. The region outside the field of view (FOV) wraps around at the other side of the image (white arrows) (a). When using parallel imaging and an acceleration factor of two, the region outside the FOV wraps around in the middle of the image (b). RA right atrium; RV right ventricle; LA left atrium; LV left ventricle; DAo descending aorta; LL left lung; RL right lung; PA pulmonary artery; Ao aorta
Fig. 2Aliasing in flow sequences in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and turbulence in the left ventricular outflow tract. The aliasing artefact decreased and later vanished upon elevation of the velocity-encoding (VENC) gradient
Fig. 3Ghosting artefact caused by respiratory motion in a Turbo Spin Echo T1 weighted (black blood) sequence, axial view (a) and phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) LGE sequence, 3-chamber view (b)
Fig. 4Long-axis (two-chamber) view of the heart of a patient with an old infarction in the LAD trajectory and a large aneurysm of the anterior wall. During systole (a), a flow artefact (encircled) caused by the blood flowing through the pulmonary artery can be observed. The white arrow in panel a indicates an inhomogeneity artefact. Inhomogeneity artefacts usually arise when structures with different magnetic properties coexist in a small area. The white arrow in panel b indicates a chemical shift artefact, surrounding a thrombus in the LV apex
Fig. 5Comparison between a Gibbs ringing artefact (septal wall) and a true subendocardial perfusion defect (lateral wall) in the same patient. The artefact usually lasts for a few heartbeats (a). A perfusion defect tends to be more persistent (b)
Fig. 6Example of susceptibility artefacts caused by the presence of ferromagnetic materials. In panel a the artefact is caused by the presence of a bra. In panel b, an implanted loop recorder was present during the examination