Literature DB >> 12573373

Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study.

Anja Wagner1, Heiko Mahrholdt, Thomas A Holly, Michael D Elliott, Matthias Regenfus, Michele Parker, Francis J Klocke, Robert O Bonow, Raymond J Kim, Robert M Judd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarcts are routinely detected by nuclear imaging techniques such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. A newly developed technique for infarct detection based on contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has higher spatial resolution than SPECT. We postulated that this technique would detect infarcts missed by SPECT.
METHODS: We did contrast-enhanced CMR and SPECT examinations in 91 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. All CMR and SPECT images were scored, using a 14-segment model, for the presence, location, and spatial extent of infarction. To compare each imaging modality to a gold standard, we also acquired contrast-enhanced CMR and SPECT images in 12 dogs with, and three dogs without, myocardial infarction as defined by histochemical staining.
FINDINGS: In animals, contrast-enhanced CMR and SPECT detected all segments with nearly transmural infarction (>75% transmural extent of the left-ventricular wall). CMR also identified 100 of the 109 segments (92%) with subendocardial infarction (<50% transmural extent of the left-ventricular wall), whereas SPECT identified only 31 (28%). SPECT and CMR showed high specificity for the detection of infarction (97% and 98%, respectively). In patients, all segments with nearly transmural infarction, as defined by contrast-enhanced CMR, were detected by SPECT. However, of the 181 segments with subendocardial infarction, 85 (47%) were not detected by SPECT. On a per patient basis, six (13%) individuals with subendocardial infarcts visible by CMR had no evidence of infarction by SPECT.
INTERPRETATION: SPECT and CMR detect transmural myocardial infarcts at similar rates. However, CMR systematically detects subendocardial infarcts that are missed by SPECT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12573373     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12389-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  303 in total

1.  Reliability of myocardial salvage assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute reperfused myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Steffen Desch; Hubertus Engelhardt; Josefine Meissner; Ingo Eitel; Mahdi Sareban; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diagnostic value of routine clinical parameters in acute myocardial infarction: a comparison to delayed contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Klein; E Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Detection of myocardial viability in acute infarction using contrast-enhanced (1)H magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H B Hillenbrand; J Sandstede; C Lipke; H Köstler; T Pabst; E Werner; G Ertl; D Hahn; W R Bauer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Fundamental concepts in myocardial viability assessment revisited: when knowing how much is "alive" is not enough.

Authors:  R J Kim; D J Shah
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  British Cardiac Society Working Group on the definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K A A Fox; J Birkhead; R Wilcox; C Knight; J Barth
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  CMR for characterization of the myocardium in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

9.  Peri-infarct ischaemia assessed by cardiovascular MRI: comparison with quantitative perfusion single photon emission CT imaging.

Authors:  E Gerbaud; H Cochet; E Bullier; C Ragot; S H Gilbert; H Douard; Y Pucheu; F Laurent; P Coste; L Bordenave; M Montaudon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.