Literature DB >> 20933098

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment.

Bruce L Wilkoff1, David Bello, Milos Taborsky, Josef Vymazal, Emanuel Kanal, Hubertus Heuer, Katrin Hecking, W Ben Johnson, William Young, Brian Ramza, Naveed Akhtar, Bernhard Kuepper, Peter Hunold, Roger Luechinger, Helmut Puererfellner, Firat Duru, M J W Gotte, Richard Sutton, Torsten Sommer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pacemaker patients is contraindicated due to documented potential risks to the patient from hazardous interactions between the MRI and pacemaker system.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, controlled, worldwide clinical trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a pacemaker system designed for safe use in MRI for any bradycardia indicated patient.
METHODS: Patients (n = 464) were randomized to undergo an MRI scan between 9 and 12 weeks postimplant (MRI group, n = 258) or not to undergo MRI (control group, n = 206) after successful implantation of the specially designed dual-chamber pacemaker and leads. Patients were monitored for arrhythmias, symptoms, and pacemaker system function during 14 nonclinically indicated relevant brain and lumbar MRI sequences. Sequences were performed at 1.5 T and included scans with high radiofrequency power deposition and/or high gradient dB/dt exposure. Clinical evaluation of the pacemaker system function occurred immediately before and after MRI, 1 week and 1 month post-MRI, and at corresponding times for the control group. Primary endpoints for safety analyzed the MRI procedure complication-free rate and for effectiveness compared capture and sensing performance between MRI and control groups.
RESULTS: No MRI-related complications occurred during or after MRI, including sustained ventricular arrhythmias, pacemaker inhibition or output failures, electrical resets, or other pacemaker malfunctions. Pacing capture threshold and sensed electrogram amplitude changes were minimal and similar between study groups.
CONCLUSION: This trial documented the ability of this pacemaker system to be exposed in a controlled fashion to MRI in a 1.5 T scanner without adverse impact on patient outcomes or pacemaker system function.
Copyright © 2011 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20933098     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  52 in total

1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac devices. Current status and future perspectives of MR-compatible systems].

Authors:  M Dorenkamp; M Roser; B Hamm; W Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

4.  MRI and cardiac pacing devices--beware the rules are changing.

Authors:  V Raj; R O'Dwyer; R Pathmanathan; R Vaidhyanath
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  MRI conditional pacemakers: the start of a new era.

Authors:  S P Harden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  [Who dictates the rhythm which must be followed? : Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in anesthesiology].

Authors:  M Bischoff; A Walther; C Serf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Safety of implanted cardiac devices in an MRI environment.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?

Authors:  Richard Sutton; David G Benditt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Optical pacing of the adult rabbit heart.

Authors:  Michael W Jenkins; Y T Wang; Y Q Doughman; M Watanabe; Y Cheng; A M Rollins
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  [Pacemaker and MRI in clinical practice].

Authors:  A Fendt; M Strauß; K Kouraki; R Zahn; T Kleemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.