Literature DB >> 25338657

Endogenous temporal and spatial orienting: Evidence for two distinct attentional mechanisms.

Noam Weinbach1, Inbal Shofty, Shai Gabay, Avishai Henik.   

Abstract

The requirement to orient attention in space and time usually occurs simultaneously. Previous reports were indecisive regarding possible interactions between temporal and spatial orienting. The present study examined whether temporal and spatial orienting can operate simultaneously and independently in the framework of a detection task. Participants completed three consecutive target detection tasks: in the first two tasks a central cue provided predictive information regarding either the temporal delay of the target or its spatial location. In a third task the temporal and spatial cues from the first two tasks were combined into a single cue. Temporal and spatial information provided by the combined cue could be valid or invalid for each type of information separately. Results from the combined temporal-spatial task revealed that at a short cue-to-target interval temporal validity effects were significant at the attended and unattended spatial locations and were not modulated by spatial validity conditions. Spatial validity effects were also significant and comparable between the valid and invalid temporal conditions. Moreover, temporal and spatial validity effects in the combined task were equivalent to those attained in the separate tasks. At a long cue-to-target delay, spatial validity effects were significant and were not modulated by temporal validity but there were no temporal validity effects. Overall, the results suggest that participants were able to extract temporal and spatial information provided by a single cue simultaneously and independently. We conclude that temporal and spatial endogenous orienting function orthogonally in a task that does not require demanding perceptual discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25338657     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0750-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Juan Lupianez; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.

Authors:  Andrea Berger; Avishai Henik; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

3.  The effects of expectancy on inhibition of return.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-27

4.  Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

5.  Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.

Authors:  J T Coull; A C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Paolo Bartolomeo; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Individual differences in attention strategies during detection, fine discrimination, and coarse discrimination.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Elizabeth A Hecker; John T Serences; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: some misconceptions.

Authors:  Saul Sternberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-17

10.  Additive factors do not imply discrete processing stages: a worked example using models of the stroop task.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.

Authors:  Tobias Schoeberl; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-15

2.  The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Noam Tal-Perry; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Segregation of Brain Structural Networks Supports Spatio-Temporal Predictive Processing.

Authors:  Valentina Ciullo; Daniela Vecchio; Tommaso Gili; Gianfranco Spalletta; Federica Piras
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  If not When, then Where? Ignoring Temporal Information Eliminates Reflexive but not Volitional Spatial Orienting.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.