Literature DB >> 17586483

The effects of expectancy on inhibition of return.

Shai Gabay1, Avishai Henik.   

Abstract

This research examined the influence of cue temporal predictability on inhibition of return (IOR). In exogenous attention experiments, the cue that summons attention is non-informative as to where the target will appear. However, it is predictive as to when it will appear. Because in most experiments there are equal numbers of trials for each cue-target interval (SOA--stimulus onset asynchrony), as time passes from the appearance of the cue, the probability of target presentation increases. Predictability was manipulated by using three SOA distributions: non-aging, aging and accelerated-aging. A robust IOR was found that was not modulated by temporal information within a trial. These results show that reflexive effects are relatively protected against modulation by higher volitional processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586483     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  9 in total

1.  Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

2.  Inhibitory interaction: the effects of multiple non-predictive visual cues.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Daniel Barnes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

3.  Using Rescorla's truly random control condition to measure truly exogenous covert orienting.

Authors:  Mohammad Habibnezhad; Michael A Lawrence; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

4.  Endogenous temporal and spatial orienting: Evidence for two distinct attentional mechanisms.

Authors:  Noam Weinbach; Inbal Shofty; Shai Gabay; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

5.  Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated with Selective Attention in Healthy Male High-School Students.

Authors:  Eivind Wengaard; Morten Kristoffersen; Anette Harris; Hilde Gundersen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Changes in Tonic Alertness but Not Voluntary Temporal Preparation Modulate the Attention Elicited by Task-Relevant Gaze and Arrow Cues.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-07

7.  Inhibitory and Facilitatory Cueing Effects: Competition between Exogenous and Endogenous Mechanisms.

Authors:  Alfred Lim; Vivian Eng; Caitlyn Osborne; Steve M J Janssen; Jason Satel
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-22

8.  If not When, then Where? Ignoring Temporal Information Eliminates Reflexive but not Volitional Spatial Orienting.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-06

9.  Measuring attention using the Posner cuing paradigm: the role of across and within trial target probabilities.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.