Wujin Sun1, Tianyue Jiang, Yue Lu, Margaret Reiff, Ran Mo, Zhen Gu. 1. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
Abstract
A bioinspired cocoon-like anticancer drug delivery system consisting of a deoxyribonuclease (DNase)-degradable DNA nanoclew (NCl) embedded with an acid-responsive DNase I nanocapsule (NCa) was developed for targeted cancer treatment. The NCl was assembled from a long-chain single-stranded DNA synthesized by rolling-circle amplification (RCA). Multiple GC-pair sequences were integrated into the NCl for enhanced loading capacity of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX). Meanwhile, negatively charged DNase I was encapsulated in a positively charged acid-degradable polymeric nanogel to facilitate decoration of DNase I into the NCl by electrostatic interactions. In an acidic environment, the activity of DNase I was activated through the acid-triggered shedding of the polymeric shell of the NCa, resulting in the cocoon-like self-degradation of the NCl and promoting the release of DOX for enhanced therapeutic efficacy.
A bioinspired cocoon-like anticancer drug delivery system consisting of a deoxyribonuclease (DNase)-degradable DNA nanoclew (NCl) embedded with an acid-responsive DNase I nanocapsule (NCa) was developed for targeted cancer treatment. The NCl was assembled from a long-chain single-stranded DNA synthesized by rolling-circle amplification (RCA). Multiple GC-pair sequences were integrated into the NCl for enhanced loading capacity of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX). Meanwhile, negatively charged DNase I was encapsulated in a positively charged acid-degradable polymeric nanogel to facilitate decoration of DNase I into the NCl by electrostatic interactions. In an acidic environment, the activity of DNase I was activated through the acid-triggered shedding of the polymeric shell of the NCa, resulting in the cocoon-like self-degradation of the NCl and promoting the release of DOX for enhanced therapeutic efficacy.
Self-assembled DNA nanostructures
have been developed with precisely controlled size and architecture.[1] Because of DNA’s intrinsic biocompatibility
and degradability, DNA nanostructures hold tremendous promise for
drug delivery. Numerous cargoes, including small-molecule drugs,[2] small interfering RNA (siRNA),[1a,3] the
immunostimulatory oligonucleotide CpG,[4] photosensitizers,[5] and proteins,[1b] have been successfully delivered intracellularly
by DNA nanocarriers. Moreover, DNA-based carriers can be readily functionalized
either by hybridizing a targeting moiety onto the nanostructure[1a] or programming a targeting aptamer into the
DNA chain[1b,1c] for targeted drug delivery. Despite these
advances, strategies utilizing DNA scaffolds for on-demand drug delivery
in a stimuli-responsive fashion,[6] instead
of passive release,[7] still remain elusive.
We have recently reported an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-responsive
formulation incorporating short DNA strands (with ATP’s aptamer)
loaded with doxorubicin (DOX), an anticancer drug.[8] The enhanced drug release inside cancer cells triggered
by a high ATP level was validated. However, this design is limited
by a complicated formulation process and relatively low drug loading
capacity.We herein describe a bioinspired drug delivery carrier
in which
a cocoon-like DNA nanocomposite is integrated with “caged worm”
deoxyribonuclease (DNase) to achieve self-degradation for promoting
drug release inside cells (Figure 1). The DNA
structure is based on a “nanoclew” (denoted as NCl)
that is “woven” by rolling-circle amplification (RCA)
[Scheme S1 in the Supporting Information (SI)], the product of which is often applied in biodetection.[9] Multiple GC-pair sequences are integrated into
the NCl to enhance the loading capacity of DOX.[8] To facilitate self-assembly, a palindromic sequence is
incorporated into the template. To enable degradation of NCl, DNase
I is encapsulated into a single-protein-based nanocapsule (denoted
as NCa) with a positively charged thin polymeric shell that is cross-linked
by acid-degradable cross-linkers using interfacial polymerization
(Figure 1a).[10] Furthermore,
to achieve tumor-targeting delivery of DOX, folic acid (FA) is conjugated
to an NCl complementary DNA (cDNA) oligomer followed by hybridization
to the DNA NCl. The positively charged NCa can be embedded into the
NCl via electrostatic interactions to form the DOX-loaded self-degradable
DNA scaffold (designated as DOX/FA-NCl/NCa). The polymeric capsule
cages the activity of DNase I at physiological pH, causing DOX to
be retained in the NCl. When DOX/FA-NCl/NCa is internalized by cancer
cells and enters the acidic endolysosome, the polymeric shell of NCa
degrades and is shed from DNase I. This results in the immediate rejuvenation
of DNase I, which rapidly degrades NCl, thereby releasing the encapsulated
DOX for enhanced anticancer efficacy (Figure 1b). This formulation represents a novel stimuli-responsive drug delivery
system, the trigger of which is preloaded with the delivery vehicle
and can be activated by the cellular environment.
Figure 1
(a) Main components of
the cocoon-like self-degradable DNA nanoclew,
consisting of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa, and acid-triggered DOX release. (b)
Schematic illustration of efficient delivery of DOX by DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
to nuclei for cancer therapy: (I) internalization in endosomes; (II)
pH-triggered degradation of the NCl for DOX release; (III) accumulation
of DOX in cell nuclei.
(a) Main components of
the cocoon-like self-degradable DNA nanoclew,
consisting of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa, and acid-triggered DOX release. (b)
Schematic illustration of efficient delivery of DOX by DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
to nuclei for cancer therapy: (I) internalization in endosomes; (II)
pH-triggered degradation of the NCl for DOX release; (III) accumulation
of DOX in cell nuclei.To validate our assumption, we first synthesized the DNA
NCl by
RCA (the sequence is shown in Table S1 in the SI). Cyclization of the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) template
was confirmed by its resistance to Exonuclease I, and RCA products
with various molecular weights were amplified from the circular ssDNA
template (Figure S1 in the SI). NCl exhibited
high stability after incubation with culture medium containing fetal
bovine serum (FBS) (10% v/v) for up to 48 h (Figure
S1c). The synthesized ssDNA self-assembled into the three-dimensional
clew-like structure with an average particle size of 150 nm (Figure 2a). Intercalation of DOX into NCl was monitored
via the fluorescence intensity of the DOX solution, which significantly
declined when NCl was added as a result of self-quenching[8] of DOX upon interacting with the NCl (Figure S2). The DOX loading was also assessed
(Figure S3). It was found that at a mass
ratio of 2.3, NCl showed a maximum DOX-loading capacity of 66.7%,
and 86.5% of the added DOX was entrapped in the obtained NCl.
Figure 2
(a) Hydrodynamic
size of NCl as determined by dynamic light scattering
(DLS). Inset: atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of NCl. The scale
bar is 500 nm. (b) Hydrodynamic size of NCa. Inset: transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) image of NCa. The scale bar is 10 nm. (c) Circular
dichroism (CD) spectra of native DNase I and NCa. (d) DNA-degrading
activities of NCa and cNCa at pH 7.4 and 5.4. Bars represent mean
± standard deviation (n = 3).
(a) Hydrodynamic
size of NCl as determined by dynamic light scattering
(DLS). Inset: atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of NCl. The scale
bar is 500 nm. (b) Hydrodynamic size of NCa. Inset: transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) image of NCa. The scale bar is 10 nm. (c) Circular
dichroism (CD) spectra of native DNase I and NCa. (d) DNA-degrading
activities of NCa and cNCa at pH 7.4 and 5.4. Bars represent mean
± standard deviation (n = 3).Both native DNase I and the obtained NCl had negatively
charged
surfaces (Table S2). To integrate them
together, DNase I was encapsulated in a positively charged polymeric
single-protein nanogel by means of in situ free-radical polymerization,[10b] which encapsulated DNase I into a capsule with
the ζ potential converted from −9 to +3 mV. Monodispersed
NCa was obtained with an average particle size of 8.0 nm, which is
larger than the size of the native DNase I (4.2 nm) (Figure 2b). Encapsulating DNase I in the capsule had no
impact on its secondary structure (Figure 2c), and acid-responsive degradation[11] of
NCa was observed (Figure S4). Glycerol
dimethacrylate (GDA), the pH-responsive cross-linker in NCa, is stable
at physiological pH but degradable at a lower pH,[10a] NCa degradation was observed after incubation at pH 5.4
for 2 h. The particle size of NCa was remarkably decreased at pH 5.4
compared with that at pH 7.4.To further substantiate the pH-responsive
DNA-degrading capability
of NCa, a nondegradable DNase I capsule (cNCa) prepared with a nondegradable
cross-linker, methylenebis(acrylamide), in place of GDA was used as
a control. The pH responsiveness of NCa was further confirmed by testing
the enzymatic activity of DNase I (Figure 2d). Because of the nondegradability of cNCa, the polymeric shell
of cNCa impeded the DNase I activity at both pH 7.4 and 5.4. However,
NCa showed significantly higher DNase I activity at pH 5.4 than that
at pH 7.4.Next, we mixed negatively charged NCl with positively
charged NCa
to form homogeneous NCl/NCa complexes (PDI = 0.24 ± 0.02). The
NCl/NCa assembly was observed by the colocalization of the fluorescence
signals of DOX (red) in DOX/NCl and Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) (green)
in AF488-modified NCa (Figure S5). The
NCl/NCa assembly increased the average hydrodynamic size of NCl from
150 to 180 nm, and the NCl ζ potential was converted from negative
to positive (Figure 3a and Table S2). Furthermore, the TEM image clearly showed that
gold nanoparticle-labeled NCa[10a,12] (Au-NCa) (Table S2) was well-decorated onto the NCl surface
(Figure 3a).
Figure 3
(a) Hydrodynamic size of NCl/NCa complexes.
Inset: TEM image of
an NCl/Au-NCa complex. The scale bar is 100 nm. The arrows indicate
Au-NCa adsorbed on the NCl surface. (b) DOX release from DOX/NCl/NCa
and DOX/NCl/cNCa at pH 7.4 and 5.4. Bars represent mean ± SD
(n = 3). (c) AFM images of NCl/NCa complexes after
incubation at pH 7.4 and 5.4 for 2 h. The scale bar is 500 nm.
(a) Hydrodynamic size of NCl/NCa complexes.
Inset: TEM image of
an NCl/Au-NCa complex. The scale bar is 100 nm. The arrows indicate
Au-NCa adsorbed on the NCl surface. (b) DOX release from DOX/NCl/NCa
and DOX/NCl/cNCa at pH 7.4 and 5.4. Bars represent mean ± SD
(n = 3). (c) AFM images of NCl/NCa complexes after
incubation at pH 7.4 and 5.4 for 2 h. The scale bar is 500 nm.The release profiles of DOX from
DOX/NCl/NCa at different pH values
were determined[8a] (Figure 3b), and pH reduction resulted in promoted release of DOX.
At pH 5.4, the cumulative release of DOX within 260 min was 3.7-fold
that at pH 7.4. In contrast, there was no apparent difference in the
release of DOX from DOX/NCl/cNCa at pH 5.4 and 7.4. Similarly, The
NCl/NCa complexes remained stable at pH 7.4 for 2 h, while a high
degradation efficiency of NCl/NCa complexes was observed at pH 5.4
(Figure 3c).To enhance the tumor-targeting
efficacy of DOX/NCl/NCa, a ligand
containing FA (cDNA-PEG-FA) was hybridized into the NCl, and the hybridization
of cDNA-PEG-FA to the NCl resulted in no significant change in the
NCl particle size and ζ potential (Table
S2). The endocytosis pathway of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa was determined
by incubating humanbreast cancer (MCF-7) cells overexpressing FR[13] with different inhibitors for specific pathways
(Figure 4a). Compared with other inhibitors,
both chlorpromazine (CPZ) and amiloride (AMI) displayed pronounced
effects in inhibiting the internalization of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa, suggesting
that DOX/FA-NCl/NCa was internalized by the cells and localized in
the acidic endosomes.
Figure 4
(a) Relative uptake efficiency of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa by MCF-7
cells.
**, P < 0.01 compared with the control. Bars represent
mean ± SD (n = 3). (b) Confocal laser scanning
microscopy images of MCF-7 cells after incubation with DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
for different times. Late endosome and lysosomes were stained with
LysoTracker green. Red, DOX; green, endolysosome; blue, Hoechst 33342;
yellow, colocalization of red and green pixels; magenta, colocalization
of red and blue pixels. The scale bar is 10 μm. (c) In vitro
cytotoxicities of DOX/NCl, DOX/NCl/NCa, and DOX/FA-NCl/NCa against
MCF-7 cells for 24 h. *, P < 0.05. Bars represent
mean ± SD (n = 6). (d) In vitro cytotoxicities
of the blank FA-NCl, NCa, and FA-NCl/NCa against MCF-7 cells for 24
h. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 6).
(a) Relative uptake efficiency of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa by MCF-7
cells.
**, P < 0.01 compared with the control. Bars represent
mean ± SD (n = 3). (b) Confocal laser scanning
microscopy images of MCF-7 cells after incubation with DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
for different times. Late endosome and lysosomes were stained with
LysoTracker green. Red, DOX; green, endolysosome; blue, Hoechst 33342;
yellow, colocalization of red and green pixels; magenta, colocalization
of red and blue pixels. The scale bar is 10 μm. (c) In vitro
cytotoxicities of DOX/NCl, DOX/NCl/NCa, and DOX/FA-NCl/NCa against
MCF-7 cells for 24 h. *, P < 0.05. Bars represent
mean ± SD (n = 6). (d) In vitro cytotoxicities
of the blank FA-NCl, NCa, and FA-NCl/NCa against MCF-7 cells for 24
h. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 6).The intracellular distribution of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
was then detected
(Figures 4b and S6). The internalization and nucleus targeting of DOX/FA-NCl/NCa in
MCF-7 cells was extremely fast even within the first 10–30
min, during which period obvious endolysosomal entrapment and nucleus
targeting of DOX could be observed. Colocalization of DOX/FA-NCl with
NCa in MCF-7 cells was also observed (Figure S7). In the first 10 min, DOX/FA-NCl/AF488-NCa was internalized together.
The fluorescence signals of DOX and AF488 showed a high colocalization.
After 0.5 h, a large amount of DOX was released from the DOX/FA-NCl/AF488-NCa
into the cytosol and specifically accumulated in the nucleus. Such
rapid cytosolic distribution and nucleus-targeting effects of DOX
delivered by DOX/FA-NCl/NCa were attributed to the efficient degradation
of DOX/FA-NCl by NCa to promote the release of DOX.The in vitro
cytotoxicities of DOX/NCl, DOX/NCl/NCa, and DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
against MCF-7 cells were estimated (Figure 4c). DOX/NCl/NCa showed a remarkably higher cytotoxicity toward MCF-7
cells than DOX/NCl. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of DOX/NCl/NCa was calculated to be 1.2 μM, which
is noticeably lower than the value of 2.3 μM for DOX/NCl. This
verified that the NCa-mediated DOX release increased the toxicity
of DOX delivered by NCl. This was further validated by the significantly
higher cytotoxicity of MCF-7 treated with DOX/NCl/NCa than that associated
with DOX/NCl/cNCa (Figure S8). Additionally,
the conjugation of FA onto the NCl surface enhanced the therapeutic
efficacy of DOX (Figure 4c). DOX/FA-NCl/NCa
had the lowest IC50 (0.9 μM) compared with both DOX/NCl/NCa
and DOX/NCl. The blank FA-NCl without DOX showed negligible toxicity
at all tested concentrations (Figure 4d). It
is noteworthy that although DNase I, the component of the carrier
in this research, has been used as an anticancer agent in some other
studies,[14] the cytotoxicity of NCa toward
MCF-7 at the selected concentration in this study was compromised
compared with that of released DOX (Figure 4d).In summary, we have developed a bioinspired self-degradable
drug
delivery system consisting of a woven DNA “nanoclew”
as a “cocoon matrix” and a “caged” DNase
I nanogel as “hibernating worms”. The “worms”
can be readily activated to degrade their cocoon to release encapsulated
drugs in the endolysosomal compartments. We will further the evaluate
in vivo anticancer efficacy and biocompatibility of this delivery
system. Our unique strategy provides insights for the design of new
prodrugs and can be further extended to engineer other programmed
drug delivery systems.
Authors: Jiang Li; Hao Pei; Bing Zhu; Le Liang; Min Wei; Yao He; Nan Chen; Di Li; Qing Huang; Chunhai Fan Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Zhiqing Zhang; Mark A Eckert; M Monsur Ali; Linan Liu; Dong-Ku Kang; Elizabeth Chang; Egest J Pone; Leonard S Sender; David A Fruman; Weian Zhao Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Verena J Schüller; Simon Heidegger; Nadja Sandholzer; Philipp C Nickels; Nina A Suhartha; Stefan Endres; Carole Bourquin; Tim Liedl Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Yong-Xing Zhao; Alan Shaw; Xianghui Zeng; Erik Benson; Andreas M Nyström; Björn Högberg Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Krista R Fruehauf; Tae Il Kim; Edward L Nelson; Joseph P Patterson; Szu-Wen Wang; Kenneth J Shea Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 6.988