Literature DB >> 25329371

Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: what conventional clinical tools may miss.

Andrea Hillock-Dunn1, Crystal Taylor, Emily Buss, Lori J Leibold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study tested the hypothesis that word recognition in a complex, two-talker masker is more closely related to real-world speech perception for children with hearing loss than testing performed in quiet or steady-state noise.
DESIGN: Sixteen school-age hearing aid users were tested on aided word recognition in noise or two-talker speech. Unaided estimates of speech perception in quiet were retrospectively obtained from the clinical record. Ten parents completed a questionnaire regarding their children's ease of communication and understanding in background noise.
RESULTS: Unaided performance in quiet was correlated with aided performance in competing noise, but not in two-talker speech. Only results in the two-talker masker were correlated with parental reports of their children's functional hearing abilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Speech perception testing in a complex background such as two-talker speech may provide a more accurate predictor of the communication challenges of children with hearing loss than testing in steady noise or quiet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25329371      PMCID: PMC4336618          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Candace Bourland Hick; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  PROBLEMS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF SPEECH DISCRIMINATION.

Authors:  R CARHART
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1965-09

4.  Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.

Authors:  J S Gravel; N Fausel; C Liskow; J Chobot
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A study of recorded versus live voice word recognition.

Authors:  Lisa Lucks Mendel; S Roxann Owen
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

7.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  T Finitzo-Hieber; T W Tillman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

Review 8.  Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.

Authors:  Marlene Bagatto; Sheila Moodie; Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Shane Moodie; John Pumford; K P Rachel Liu
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

9.  Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Auditory development in early amplified children: factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Alison Grimes; Elizabeth Christensen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  19 in total

1.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Does the semantic content or syntactic regularity of masker speech affect speech-on-speech recognition?

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Penelope Bencheck; Brandi Jett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Margaret K Miller; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Speech Perception in Complex Acoustic Environments: Developmental Effects.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Authors:  Teresa Yc Ching; Vicky W Zhang; Christopher Flynn; Lauren Burns; Laura Button; Sanna Hou; Karen McGhie; Patricia Van Buynder
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Use on Outcomes of Children With Mild Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Thomas Page; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.

Authors:  Grant King; Nicole E Corbin; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.