Literature DB >> 6716999

Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.

A Boothroyd.   

Abstract

The goal of these studies was to find out how much of the acoustical information in amplified speech is accessible to children with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Context-varying, forced-choice tests of speech perception were presented, without feedback on performance, to orally trained subjects with better ear, three-frequency average hearing losses in the range 55-123 dB HL. As expected, average performance fell with increasing hearing loss. The values of hearing loss at which scores fell to 50% (after correction for chance) were 75 dB HL for consonant place; 85 dB HL for initial consonant voicing; 90 dB HL for initial consonant continuance; 100 dB HL for vowel place (front-back); 105 dB HL for talker sex; 115 dB HL for syllable pattern; and in excess of 115 dB HL for vowel height. Performance on the speech contrast tests was significantly correlated with the intelligibility of the subjects' own speech and with the open-set recognition of phonemes in monosyllabic words, even when pure-tone threshold was held constant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6716999     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2701.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  33 in total

1.  Studies in pediatric hearing loss at the House Research Institute.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen C Johnson; Amy S Martinez; Leslie Visser-Dumont; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Jennifer F Still
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Assessing toddlers' speech-sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Kaylah Lalonde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Coherence masking protection for mid-frequency formants by adults and children.

Authors:  Eric Tarr; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].

Authors:  H Meister; D Tepeli; P Wagner; W Hess; M Walger; H von Wedel; R Lang-Roth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Conception and realisation of a prosody test battery].

Authors:  H Meister; V Pyschny; M Landwehr; P Wagner; M Walger; H von Wedel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Effect of Context and Hearing Loss on Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Dawna Lewis; Judy Kopun; Ryan McCreery; Marc Brennan; Kanae Nishi; Evan Cordrey; Pat Stelmachowicz; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Selecting and Pre-setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?

Authors:  D E Lewis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

9.  Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Auditory development in early amplified children: factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Alison Grimes; Elizabeth Christensen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.