Literature DB >> 25324394

Evolution of responses to (un)fairness.

Sarah F Brosnan1, Frans B M de Waal2.   

Abstract

The human sense of fairness is an evolutionary puzzle. To study this, we can look to other species, in which this can be translated empirically into responses to reward distribution. Passive and active protest against receiving less than a partner for the same task is widespread in species that cooperate outside kinship and mating bonds. There is less evidence that nonhuman species seek to equalize outcomes to their own detriment, yet the latter has been documented in our closest relatives, the apes. This reaction probably reflects an attempt to forestall partner dissatisfaction with obtained outcomes and its negative impact on future cooperation. We hypothesize that it is the evolution of this response that allowed the development of a complete sense of fairness in humans, which aims not at equality for its own sake but for the sake of continued cooperation.
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25324394      PMCID: PMC4451566          DOI: 10.1126/science.1251776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  57 in total

1.  Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others' welfare.

Authors:  Venkat R Lakshminarayanan; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Small group ecology.

Authors:  R Sommer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle; Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) do not form expectations based on their partner's outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Timothy Flemming; Catherine F Talbot; Laura Mayo; Tara Stoinski
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers.

Authors:  Francys Subiaul; Jennifer Vonk; Sanae Okamoto-Barth; Jochen Barth
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Kristin Leimgruber; Amanda R Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Social influences on inequity aversion in children.

Authors:  Katherine McAuliffe; Peter R Blake; Grace Kim; Richard W Wrangham; Felix Warneken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Insights into Intraspecies Variation in Primate Prosocial Behavior: Capuchins (Cebus apella) Fail to Show Prosociality on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Lindsey A Drayton; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-10

10.  Different responses to reward comparisons by three primate species.

Authors:  Hani D Freeman; Jennifer Sullivan; Lydia M Hopper; Catherine F Talbot; Andrea N Holmes; Nancy Schultz-Darken; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  53 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness.

Authors:  Daniel Sznycer; Maria Florencia Lopez Seal; Aaron Sell; Julian Lim; Roni Porat; Shaul Shalvi; Eran Halperin; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distinguishing neural correlates of context-dependent advantageous- and disadvantageous-inequity aversion.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Gao; Hongbo Yu; Ignacio Sáez; Philip R Blue; Lusha Zhu; Ming Hsu; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How animals do business.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Chimpanzees' Bystander Reactions to Infanticide: An Evolutionary Precursor of Social Norms?

Authors:  Claudia Rudolf von Rohr; Carel P van Schaik; Alexandra Kissling; Judith M Burkart
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-06

6.  Cooperation in rats playing the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors:  Ruth I Wood; Jessica Y Kim; Grace R Li
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not oxytocin.

Authors:  Aaryn C Mustoe; April M Harnisch; Benjamin Hochfelder; Jon Cavanaugh; Jeffrey A French
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Responses to Economic Games of Cooperation and Conflict in Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis).

Authors:  Gillian L Vale; Lawrence E Williams; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2019-02

10.  Governing for the Common Good.

Authors:  Jennifer Prah Ruger
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.