Literature DB >> 17148417

Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Melissa Bateson1, Daniel Nettle, Gilbert Roberts.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of an image of a pair of eyes on contributions to an honesty box used to collect money for drinks in a university coffee room. People paid nearly three times as much for their drinks when eyes were displayed rather than a control image. This finding provides the first evidence from a naturalistic setting of the importance of cues of being watched, and hence reputational concerns, on human cooperative behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148417      PMCID: PMC1686213          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

Review 1.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze.

Authors:  N J Emery
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Reputation helps solve the 'tragedy of the commons'.

Authors:  Manfred Milinski; Dirk Semmann; Hans-Jürgen Krambeck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The nature of human altruism.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Urs Fischbacher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind; Victoria A Braithwaite
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem.

Authors:  Karthik Panchanathan; Robert Boyd
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.

Authors:  M A Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Engineering Human Cooperation : Does Involuntary Neural Activation Increase Public Goods Contributions?

Authors:  Terence C Burnham; Brian Hare
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-07-04

Review 8.  When does "economic man" dominate social behavior?

Authors:  Colin F Camerer; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Strong reciprocity and human sociality.

Authors:  H Gintis
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation.

Authors:  Manfred Milinski; Dirk Semmann; Hans-Jürgen Krambeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  123 in total

1.  Toward an experimental exploration of the complexity of human social interactions.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Nichola J Raihani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Incentives and opportunism: from the carrot to the stick.

Authors:  Christian Hilbe; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Maxwell N Burton-Chellew; Adin Ross-Gillespie; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Six Challenges for Ethical Conduct in Science.

Authors:  Petteri Niemi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity?

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Frédéric Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Testing Theories about Ethnic Markers: Ingroup Accent Facilitates Coordination, Not Cooperation.

Authors:  Niels Holm Jensen; Michael Bang Petersen; Henrik Høgh-Olesen; Michael Ejstrup
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-06

7.  Altruism in networks: the effect of connections.

Authors:  Oliver Curry; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment.

Authors:  Simon Gächter; Benedikt Herrmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Interdependence modulates the brain response to word-voice incongruity.

Authors:  Keiko Ishii; Yuki Kobayashi; Shinobu Kitayama
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games.

Authors:  Maxwell N Burton-Chellew; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.