Literature DB >> 28835562

Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Jan M Engelmann1, Jeremy B Clift2, Esther Herrmann2, Michael Tomasello2,3.   

Abstract

Chimpanzees' refusal of less-preferred food when an experimenter has previously provided preferred food to a conspecific has been taken as evidence for a sense of fairness. Here, we present a novel hypothesis-the social disappointment hypothesis-according to which food refusals express chimpanzees' disappointment in the human experimenter for not rewarding them as well as they could have. We tested this hypothesis using a two-by-two design in which food was either distributed by an experimenter or a machine and with a partner present or absent. We found that chimpanzees were more likely to reject food when it was distributed by an experimenter rather than by a machine and that they were not more likely to do so when a partner was present. These results suggest that chimpanzees' refusal of less-preferred food stems from social disappointment in the experimenter and not from a sense of fairness.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimpanzees; evolution; fairness; inequity aversion; social disappointment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28835562      PMCID: PMC5577499          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  37 in total

Review 1.  Social norms and human cooperation.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Urs Fischbacher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Animal behaviour: fair refusal by capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Partner's behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Cassiopeia Freeman; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Alexandra S Grutter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse?

Authors:  Diane Dubreuil; Maria Silvia Gentile; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Are apes really inequity averse?

Authors:  Juliane Bräuer; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect.

Authors:  Peter G Roma; Alan Silberberg; Angela M Ruggiero; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Hillary C Schiff; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Chimpanzees consider freedom of choice in their evaluation of social action.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Esther Herrmann; Marina Proft; Stefanie Keupp; Yarrow Dunham; Hannes Rakoczy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Chimpanzees demonstrate individual differences in social information use.

Authors:  Stuart K Watson; Gillian L Vale; Lydia M Hopper; Lewis G Dean; Rachel L Kendal; Elizabeth E Price; Lara A Wood; Sarah J Davis; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game.

Authors:  Ryan Sigmundson; Mathieu S Stribos; Roy Hammer; Julia Herzele; Lena S Pflüger; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.

Authors:  Jim McGetrick; Friederike Range
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Parrots do not show inequity aversion.

Authors:  Anastasia Krasheninnikova; Désirée Brucks; Nina Buffenoir; Dániel Rivas Blanco; Delphine Soulet; Auguste von Bayern
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Naturalizing Darwall's Second Person Standpoint.

Authors:  Carme Isern-Mas; Antoni Gomila
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2020-12

8.  Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro; Federico Rossano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.