Literature DB >> 22544731

Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression.

Yuan Le1, Randall Kroeker, Hal D Kipfer, Chen Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a new pulse sequence called time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) Dixon for dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The method combines dual-echo Dixon to generate separated water and fat images with a k-space view-sharing scheme developed for 3D TWIST. The performance of TWIST Dixon was compared with a volume interpolated breathhold examination (VIBE) sequence paired with spectrally selective adiabatic inversion Recovery (SPAIR) and quick fat-sat (QFS) fat-suppression techniques at 3.0T using quantitative measurements of fat-suppression accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency, as well as qualitative breast image evaluations.
RESULTS: The water fraction of a uniform phantom was calculated from the following images: 0.66 ± 0.03 for TWIST Dixon; 0.56 ± 0.23 for VIBE-SPAIR, and 0.53 ± 0.14 for VIBE-QFS, while the reference value is 0.70 measured by spectroscopy. For phantoms with contrast (Gd-BOPTA) concentration ranging from 0-6 mM, TWIST Dixon also provides consistently higher SNR efficiency (3.2-18.9) compared with VIBE-SPAIR (2.8-16.8) and VIBE-QFS (2.4-12.5). Breast images acquired with TWIST Dixon at 3.0T show more robust and uniform fat suppression and superior overall image quality compared with VIBE-SPAIR.
CONCLUSION: The results from phantom and volunteer evaluation suggest that TWIST Dixon outperforms conventional methods in almost every aspect and it is a promising method for DCE-MRI and contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI, especially at higher field strength where fat suppression is challenging.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22544731     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  20 in total

Review 1.  Overview of left ventricular outpouchings on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Arun Sharma; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-12

2.  A comparison of shimming techniques for optimizing fat suppression in MR mammography.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Kengo Nishiyama; Tosiaki Miyati; Hideto Miyano; Mariko Kajihara; Thai Akasaka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-06-01

3.  4D-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Preoperative Localization in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  J L Becker; V Patel; K J Johnson; M Guerrero; R R Klein; G F Ranvier; R P Owen; P Pawha; K Nael
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Shape-based motion correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of renal function.

Authors:  Wenyang Liu; Kyunghyun Sung; Dan Ruan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Influence of scan duration on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for breast lesions: a study based on CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique.

Authors:  Wen Hao; Bin Zhao; Guangbin Wang; Cuiyan Wang; Hui Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Segmentation of biological images containing multitarget labeling using the jelly filling framework.

Authors:  Neeraj J Gadgil; Paul Salama; Kenneth W Dunn; Edward J Delp
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-23

7.  Modified CAIPIRINHA-VIBE without view-sharing on gadoxetic acid-enhanced multi-arterial phase MR imaging for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE.

Authors:  Seung Baek Hong; Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Hyeong Il Seo; Hyun Sung Kim; Dong Uk Kim; Tae Un Kim; Hwa Seong Ryu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Dynamic 4D MRI for Characterization of Parathyroid Adenomas: Multiparametric Analysis.

Authors:  K Nael; J Hur; A Bauer; R Khan; A Sepahdari; R Inampudi; M Guerrero
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions.

Authors:  Marco Essig; Mark S Shiroishi; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Marc Saake; James M Provenzale; David Enterline; Nicoletta Anzalone; Arnd Dörfler; Alex Rovira; Max Wintermark; Meng Law
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  3D Cartesian MRI with compressed sensing and variable view sharing using complementary poisson-disc sampling.

Authors:  Evan Levine; Bruce Daniel; Shreyas Vasanawala; Brian Hargreaves; Manojkumar Saranathan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.