RATIONALE: A low respiratory arousal threshold (ArTH) is one of several traits involved in obstructive sleep apnea pathogenesis and may be a therapeutic target; however, there is no simple way to identify patients without invasive measurements. OBJECTIVES: To determine the physiologic determinates of the ArTH and develop a clinical tool that can identify patients with low ArTH. METHODS: Anthropometric data were collected in 146 participants who underwent overnight polysomnography with an epiglottic catheter to measure the ArTH (nadir epiglottic pressure before arousal). The ArTH was measured from up to 20 non-REM and REM respiratory events selected randomly. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent predictors of the ArTH. Logistic regression was used to develop a clinical scoring system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nadir oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry, apnea-hypopnea index, and the fraction of events that were hypopneas (Fhypopneas) were independent predictors of the ArTH (r(2) = 0.59; P < 0.001). Using this information, we used receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression to develop a clinical score to predict a low ArTH, which allocated a score of 1 to each criterion that was satisfied: (apnea-hypopnea index, <30 events per hour) + (nadir oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry >82.5%) + (Fhypopneas >58.3%). A score of 2 or above correctly predicted a low arousal threshold in 84.1% of participants with a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 88.0%, a finding that was confirmed using leave-one-out cross-validation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that individuals with a low ArTH can be identified from standard, clinically available variables. This finding could facilitate larger interventional studies targeting the ArTH.
RATIONALE: A low respiratory arousal threshold (ArTH) is one of several traits involved in obstructive sleep apnea pathogenesis and may be a therapeutic target; however, there is no simple way to identify patients without invasive measurements. OBJECTIVES: To determine the physiologic determinates of the ArTH and develop a clinical tool that can identify patients with low ArTH. METHODS: Anthropometric data were collected in 146 participants who underwent overnight polysomnography with an epiglottic catheter to measure the ArTH (nadir epiglottic pressure before arousal). The ArTH was measured from up to 20 non-REM and REM respiratory events selected randomly. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent predictors of the ArTH. Logistic regression was used to develop a clinical scoring system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Nadir oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry, apnea-hypopnea index, and the fraction of events that were hypopneas (Fhypopneas) were independent predictors of the ArTH (r(2) = 0.59; P < 0.001). Using this information, we used receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression to develop a clinical score to predict a low ArTH, which allocated a score of 1 to each criterion that was satisfied: (apnea-hypopnea index, <30 events per hour) + (nadir oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry >82.5%) + (Fhypopneas >58.3%). A score of 2 or above correctly predicted a low arousal threshold in 84.1% of participants with a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 88.0%, a finding that was confirmed using leave-one-out cross-validation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that individuals with a low ArTH can be identified from standard, clinically available variables. This finding could facilitate larger interventional studies targeting the ArTH.
Authors: Michael C Hlavac; Peter G Catcheside; Rachel McDonald; Danny J Eckert; Samantha Windler; R Doug McEvoy Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Andrey Zinchuk; Bradley A Edwards; Sangchoon Jeon; Brian B Koo; John Concato; Scott Sands; Andrew Wellman; Henry K Yaggi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Shane A Landry; Simon A Joosten; Scott A Sands; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman; Garun S Hamilton; Bradley A Edwards Journal: Respirology Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: Bradley A Edwards; Scott A Sands; Robert L Owens; Danny J Eckert; Shane Landry; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Jennifer H Walsh; Carolyn Visser; Kathleen Maddison; Chrianna Bharat; David R Hillman; Peter R Eastwood Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Bradley A Edwards; Andrew Wellman; Anthony Turton; Elizabeth M Skuza; Philip J Berger; Garun S Hamilton Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849