STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sustained hypoxia is a neurocognitive depressant, which has been shown to impair respiratory load sensation. Hypoxia has also been shown to impair arousal in animal models, but the effects of sustained hypoxia on arousal in humans have not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of sustained hypoxia on arousal from sleep in normal subjects. DESIGN: Twelve normal male subjects (age, 24.3 +/- 1.2 years; body mass index, 24.8 +/- 1.4 kg/m2) were studied during stable stage 2 non-rapid eye movement sleep on 2 separate nights 1 week apart. SETTING: Sleep physiology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Normal healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Arousal responses to external resistive loads (18 cm H2O x L(-1) x sec(-1)) and occlusions were compared during room-air breathing following sustained normoxia and isocapnic hypoxia (SaO2 approximately 85%). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Time to arousal and minimum esophageal pressure preceding arousal were measured. Time to arousal was significantly increased following hypoxia compared with normoxia for resistive loads (24.6 + 4.4 seconds vs. 12.6 +/- 1.9 seconds, p = .007) but not occlusions. Minimum esophageal pressure prior to arousal was more negative following hypoxia for both external loads (-16.8 +/- 1.2 vs. -13.5 +/- 1.3 cm H2O, p = .035) and occlusions (-19.6 +/- 2.2 vs. -15.1 +/- 1.5 cm H2O, p = .029). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sustained isocapnic hypoxia delays arousal to inspiratory loading during sleep and increases the respiratory arousal threshold. This has implications for disorders characterized by sustained nocturnal hypoxia, such as neuromuscular weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, and severe obstructive sleep apnea.
STUDY OBJECTIVES:Sustained hypoxia is a neurocognitive depressant, which has been shown to impair respiratory load sensation. Hypoxia has also been shown to impair arousal in animal models, but the effects of sustained hypoxia on arousal in humans have not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of sustained hypoxia on arousal from sleep in normal subjects. DESIGN: Twelve normal male subjects (age, 24.3 +/- 1.2 years; body mass index, 24.8 +/- 1.4 kg/m2) were studied during stable stage 2 non-rapid eye movement sleep on 2 separate nights 1 week apart. SETTING: Sleep physiology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Normal healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Arousal responses to external resistive loads (18 cm H2O x L(-1) x sec(-1)) and occlusions were compared during room-air breathing following sustained normoxia and isocapnic hypoxia (SaO2 approximately 85%). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Time to arousal and minimum esophageal pressure preceding arousal were measured. Time to arousal was significantly increased following hypoxia compared with normoxia for resistive loads (24.6 + 4.4 seconds vs. 12.6 +/- 1.9 seconds, p = .007) but not occlusions. Minimum esophageal pressure prior to arousal was more negative following hypoxia for both external loads (-16.8 +/- 1.2 vs. -13.5 +/- 1.3 cm H2O, p = .035) and occlusions (-19.6 +/- 2.2 vs. -15.1 +/- 1.5 cm H2O, p = .029). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sustained isocapnic hypoxia delays arousal to inspiratory loading during sleep and increases the respiratory arousal threshold. This has implications for disorders characterized by sustained nocturnal hypoxia, such as neuromuscular weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, and severe obstructive sleep apnea.
Authors: Andrey Zinchuk; Bradley A Edwards; Sangchoon Jeon; Brian B Koo; John Concato; Scott Sands; Andrew Wellman; Henry K Yaggi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Cassie J Hilditch; R Doug McEvoy; Kate E George; Courtney C Thompson; Melissa K Ryan; Maureen Rischmueller; Peter G Catcheside Journal: Sleep Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Mihaela Teodorescu; David A Polomis; Mihai C Teodorescu; Ronald E Gangnon; Andrea G Peterson; Flavia B Consens; Ronald D Chervin; Nizar N Jarjour Journal: J Asthma Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Bradley A Edwards; Scott A Sands; Robert L Owens; David P White; Pedro R Genta; James P Butler; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: J Physiol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.182