OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patients' individual characteristics predictive of the degree of respiratory effort developed during obstructive sleep apneas (OSAs). DESIGN: Prospective consecutive sample, collection of clinical and polysomnographic data. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred sixteen consecutive OSA patients with clinical symptoms of OSA and more than 20 apneas per hour of sleep. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropomorphic data, daytime blood gas values, and polysomnographic data. From esophageal pressure measurements during sleep, three indexes of respiratory effort during OSAs were derived: the maximal end-apneic esophageal pressure swing (PesMax), the increase in esophageal pressure swing (deltaPes) during the apnea, and its ratio to apnea duration (RPes). RESULTS: The indexes of respiratory effort were significantly lower in rapid eye movement (REM) than in non-REM sleep (PesMax: 50.9+/-2.5 vs 39.6+/-1.9 cm H2O, p<0.001; deltaPes: 30.9+/-1.7 vs 23.4+/-1.4 cm H2O, p<0.001; RPes: 1.05+/-0.05 vs 0.53+/-0.03 cm H2O/s, p<0.001); therefore, a separate analysis was conducted in non-REM and in REM sleep. Indexes were also significantly lower in subgroups of older as compared to younger patients (PesMax: 55.6+/-3.5 vs 40.0+/-2.2 cm H2O, p<0.001; deltaPes: 34.2+/-2.3 vs 24.1+/-1.6 cm H2O, p=0.001; RPes: 1.21+/-0.08 vs 0.8+/-0.05 cm H2O/s, p<0.001). The three indexes were closely correlated with each other and only PesMax correlation data are reported. In non-REM sleep, age was the most important single independent correlate of PesMax (r=-0.37, p=0.000). In REM sleep, the apnea-related hypoxemia, apnea duration, and age were the main contributors to the variance of PesMax. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory effort in response to upper airway occlusion in OSA patients is lower in REM than in non-REM sleep and decreases with increasing age.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patients' individual characteristics predictive of the degree of respiratory effort developed during obstructive sleep apneas (OSAs). DESIGN: Prospective consecutive sample, collection of clinical and polysomnographic data. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred sixteen consecutive OSA patients with clinical symptoms of OSA and more than 20 apneas per hour of sleep. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropomorphic data, daytime blood gas values, and polysomnographic data. From esophageal pressure measurements during sleep, three indexes of respiratory effort during OSAs were derived: the maximal end-apneic esophageal pressure swing (PesMax), the increase in esophageal pressure swing (deltaPes) during the apnea, and its ratio to apnea duration (RPes). RESULTS: The indexes of respiratory effort were significantly lower in rapid eye movement (REM) than in non-REM sleep (PesMax: 50.9+/-2.5 vs 39.6+/-1.9 cm H2O, p<0.001; deltaPes: 30.9+/-1.7 vs 23.4+/-1.4 cm H2O, p<0.001; RPes: 1.05+/-0.05 vs 0.53+/-0.03 cm H2O/s, p<0.001); therefore, a separate analysis was conducted in non-REM and in REM sleep. Indexes were also significantly lower in subgroups of older as compared to younger patients (PesMax: 55.6+/-3.5 vs 40.0+/-2.2 cm H2O, p<0.001; deltaPes: 34.2+/-2.3 vs 24.1+/-1.6 cm H2O, p=0.001; RPes: 1.21+/-0.08 vs 0.8+/-0.05 cm H2O/s, p<0.001). The three indexes were closely correlated with each other and only PesMax correlation data are reported. In non-REM sleep, age was the most important single independent correlate of PesMax (r=-0.37, p=0.000). In REM sleep, the apnea-related hypoxemia, apnea duration, and age were the main contributors to the variance of PesMax. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory effort in response to upper airway occlusion in OSA patients is lower in REM than in non-REM sleep and decreases with increasing age.
Authors: Babak Mokhlesi; Laurel A Finn; Erika W Hagen; Terry Young; Khin Mae Hla; Eve Van Cauter; Paul E Peppard Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ari Shechter; Gary D Foster; Wei Lang; David M Reboussin; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Gary Zammit; Anne B Newman; Richard P Millman; Thomas A Wadden; John M Jakicic; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Rena R Wing; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Samuel T Kuna Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Ihunnaya O Frederick; Chunfang Qiu; Tanya K Sorensen; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Michelle A Williams Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Babak Mokhlesi; Erika W Hagen; Laurel A Finn; Khin Mae Hla; Jason R Carter; Paul E Peppard Journal: Thorax Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 9.139