Literature DB >> 25314081

Comparison of parabolic filtration methods for 3D filtered back projection in pulsed EPR imaging.

Zhiwei Qiao1, Gage Redler2, Boris Epel2, Howard J Halpern3.   

Abstract

Pulse electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (Pulse EPRI) is a robust method for noninvasively measuring local oxygen concentrations in vivo. For 3D tomographic EPRI, the most commonly used reconstruction algorithm is filtered back projection (FBP), in which the parabolic filtration process strongly influences image quality. In this work, we designed and compared 7 parabolic filtration methods to reconstruct both simulated and real phantoms. To evaluate these methods, we designed 3 error criteria and 1 spatial resolution criterion. It was determined that the 2 point derivative filtration method and the two-ramp-filter method have unavoidable negative effects resulting in diminished spatial resolution and increased artifacts respectively. For the noiseless phantom the rectangular-window parabolic filtration method and sinc-window parabolic filtration method were found to be optimal, providing high spatial resolution and small errors. In the presence of noise, the 3 point derivative method and Hamming-window parabolic filtration method resulted in the best compromise between low image noise and high spatial resolution. The 3 point derivative method is faster than Hamming-window parabolic filtration method, so we conclude that the 3 point derivative method is optimal for 3D FBP.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D FBP; EPRI; Noise; Parabolic filter; Spatial resolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25314081      PMCID: PMC4324566          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  12 in total

1.  Spatially uniform sampling in 4-D EPR spectral-spatial imaging.

Authors:  Kang-Hyun Ahn; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  A parametric approach to spectral-spatial EPR imaging.

Authors:  Subhojit Som; Lee C Potter; Rizwan Ahmad; Periannan Kuppusamy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Comparison of maximum entropy and filtered back-projection methods to reconstruct rapid-scan EPR images.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; Amarjot Dhami; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Object dependent sweep width reduction with spectral-spatial EPR imaging.

Authors:  Kang-Hyun Ahn; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Simulation of 4D spectral-spatial EPR images.

Authors:  Kang-Hyun Ahn; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Comparison of local and global angular interpolation applied to spectral-spatial EPR image reconstruction.

Authors:  Kang-Hyun Ahn; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  EPR oximetry in three spatial dimensions using sparse spin distribution.

Authors:  Subhojit Som; Lee C Potter; Rizwan Ahmad; Deepti S Vikram; Periannan Kuppusamy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Comparison of 250 MHz electron spin echo and continuous wave oxygen EPR imaging methods for in vivo applications.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Eugene D Barth; Colin Mailer; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Principal component analysis enhances SNR for dynamic electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of cycling hypoxia in vivo.

Authors:  Gage Redler; Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Spin echo spectroscopic electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Colin Mailer; Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Charles A Pelizzari; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  1 in total

1.  3D pulse EPR imaging from sparse-view projections via constrained, total variation minimization.

Authors:  Zhiwei Qiao; Gage Redler; Boris Epel; Yuhua Qian; Howard Halpern
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.229

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.