Literature DB >> 26225440

3D pulse EPR imaging from sparse-view projections via constrained, total variation minimization.

Zhiwei Qiao1, Gage Redler2, Boris Epel3, Yuhua Qian4, Howard Halpern5.   

Abstract

Tumors and tumor portions with low oxygen concentrations (pO2) have been shown to be resistant to radiation therapy. As such, radiation therapy efficacy may be enhanced if delivered radiation dose is tailored based on the spatial distribution of pO2 within the tumor. A technique for accurate imaging of tumor oxygenation is critically important to guide radiation treatment that accounts for the effects of local pO2. Electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI) has been considered one of the leading methods for quantitatively imaging pO2 within tumors in vivo. However, current EPRI techniques require relatively long imaging times. Reducing the number of projection scan considerably reduce the imaging time. Conventional image reconstruction algorithms, such as filtered back projection (FBP), may produce severe artifacts in images reconstructed from sparse-view projections. This can lower the utility of these reconstructed images. In this work, an optimization based image reconstruction algorithm using constrained, total variation (TV) minimization, subject to data consistency, is developed and evaluated. The algorithm was evaluated using simulated phantom, physical phantom and pre-clinical EPRI data. The TV algorithm is compared with FBP using subjective and objective metrics. The results demonstrate the merits of the proposed reconstruction algorithm.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compressed sensing; EPR imaging; Image reconstruction; Optimization; Total variation minimization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26225440      PMCID: PMC4827344          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2015.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  24 in total

1.  Compressed sensing of spatial electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  David H Johnson; Rizwan Ahmad; Guanglong He; Alexandre Samouilov; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  An algebraic iterative reconstruction technique for differential X-ray phase-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Jian Fu; Simone Schleede; Renbo Tan; Liyuan Chen; Martin Bech; Klaus Achterhold; Martin Gifford; Rod Loewen; Ronald Ruth; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.820

3.  Optimization-based reconstruction of sparse images from few-view projections.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Junguo Bian; Erik L Ritman; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  First-order convex feasibility algorithms for x-ray CT.

Authors:  Emil Y Sidky; Jakob S Jørgensen; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky; Michael Vannier
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.407

6.  Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Junguo Bian; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Xiao Han; Emil Y Sidky; Jerry L Prince; Charles A Pelizzari; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Maximally spaced projection sequencing in electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gage Redler; Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.176

8.  Electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging of a rabbit tumor using localized spin probe delivery.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Chad R Haney; Danielle Hleihel; Craig Wardrip; Eugene D Barth; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  SART-type image reconstruction from a limited number of projections with the sparsity constraint.

Authors:  Hengyong Yu; Ge Wang
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-26

10.  Evaluation of partial k-space strategies to speed up time-domain EPR imaging.

Authors:  Sankaran Subramanian; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; Alan McMillan; Rao P Gullapalli; Nallathamby Devasahayam; James B Mitchell; Shingo Matsumoto; Murali C Krishna
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  Accelerated dynamic EPR imaging using fast acquisition and compressive recovery.

Authors:  Rizwan Ahmad; Alexandre Samouilov; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Algebraic reconstruction of 3D spatial EPR images from high numbers of noisy projections: An improved image reconstruction technique for high resolution fast scan EPR imaging.

Authors:  Denis A Komarov; Alexandre Samouilov; Rizwan Ahmad; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  EPR Oximetry Sensor-Developing a TAM Derivative for In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Agnieszka Boś-Liedke; Magdalena Walawender; Anna Woźniak; Dorota Flak; Jacek Gapiński; Stefan Jurga; Małgorzata Kucińska; Adam Plewiński; Marek Murias; Marwa Elewa; Lisa Lampp; Peter Imming; Krzysztof Tadyszak
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.194

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.