BACKGROUND: The study was done to compare treatment and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (neoCRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (periCTX) in patients with surgically treated esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: An analysis of 105 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoCRT (n = 58) or periCTX (n = 47) and esophagectomy between 2000 and 2012 was carried out. RESULTS: The overall median survival was 5.97 years. Postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality occurred in 74%/7% of the patients the neoCRT group and in 53%/0% of the patients in the periCTX group (P = 0.03/P = 0.08). Total or subtotal histological tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment and esophagectomy was found in 59% after neoCRT and 30% after periCTX (P < 0.01). Three- and five-year survival rates were 52%/45% for neoCRT and 68%/63% for periCTX (P = 0.05). PeriCTX was identified as an independent predictor of survival (RR2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.1; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A higher rate of histologic response to neoCRT compared to histologic response following the preoperative cycles of periCTX does not translate to a benefit in overall survival. PeriCTX offers a decreased incidence of treatment-related morbidity and mortality and at least equal results in terms of survival compared to neoCRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
BACKGROUND: The study was done to compare treatment and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (neoCRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (periCTX) in patients with surgically treated esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: An analysis of 105 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoCRT (n = 58) or periCTX (n = 47) and esophagectomy between 2000 and 2012 was carried out. RESULTS: The overall median survival was 5.97 years. Postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality occurred in 74%/7% of the patients the neoCRT group and in 53%/0% of the patients in the periCTX group (P = 0.03/P = 0.08). Total or subtotal histological tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment and esophagectomy was found in 59% after neoCRT and 30% after periCTX (P < 0.01). Three- and five-year survival rates were 52%/45% for neoCRT and 68%/63% for periCTX (P = 0.05). PeriCTX was identified as an independent predictor of survival (RR2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.1; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A higher rate of histologic response to neoCRT compared to histologic response following the preoperative cycles of periCTX does not translate to a benefit in overall survival. PeriCTX offers a decreased incidence of treatment-related morbidity and mortality and at least equal results in terms of survival compared to neoCRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Ming Zeng; Fernando N Aguila; Taral Patel; Mark Knapp; Xue-Qiang Zhu; Xi-Lin Chen; Phillip D Price Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2016-05-15