Literature DB >> 16571425

Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients.

Giuseppe Portale1, Jeffrey A Hagen, Jeffrey H Peters, Linda S Chan, Steven R DeMeester, Tasha A K Gandamihardja, Tom R DeMeester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery, as the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer, is currently being challenged by the assumed high risk of esophagectomy and the poor longterm survival after resection. Epidemiologic and clinical changes over the past decade indicate that these assumptions should be reevaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the modern outcomes of esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. STUDY
DESIGN: We studied 263 consecutive patients (215 men, 48 women), who had esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma from 1992 to 2002. Ninety-seven (37%) were stage I, 63 (24%) were stage II, 93 (35%) were stage III, and 10 (4%) were stage IV. Forty-five percent (119 of 263) had curative en bloc resection, 52% (138 of 263) had node involvement, and 18% (48) received neoadjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: Seventeen percent (44 of 263) of the patients were identified in a Barrett's surveillance program. The frequency of T1N0 adenocarcinoma increased over the study period (p=0.024). The overall 5-year survival was 46.5%, and for the last 5 years of the study was 50.4%. The overall 5-year survival for stage I was 81%; for stage II, 51%; for stage III, 14%; and for stage IV, 0%. Complications occurred in 61% and there were 12 perioperative deaths (4.5%). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified tumor stage and type of resection as independent predictors of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients undergoing esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma survive >or=5 years. Improvements in survival are associated with increased detection of early stage disease, and a liberal use of en bloc resection. Nonsurgical treatments should be compared with these contemporary outcomes measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571425     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  61 in total

1.  Evaluation of quantitative image analysis criteria for the high-resolution microendoscopic detection of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Timothy J Muldoon; Nadhi Thekkek; Darren Roblyer; Dipen Maru; Noam Harpaz; Jonathan Potack; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Optical molecular imaging for detection of Barrett's-associated neoplasia.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Expression of RKIP, E-cadherin and NF-kB p65 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and their correlations.

Authors:  Fu-Min Ping; Gui-Jing Liu; Zhi-Jun Liu; Hai-Bin Li; Jian-Wen Zhai; Shu-Xia Li; Yue-Mei Liu; Bao-Wei Li; Hong Wei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

4.  Quantitative evaluation of in vivo vital-dye fluorescence endoscopic imaging for the detection of Barrett's-associated neoplasia.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Michelle H Lee; Alexandros D Polydorides; Daniel G Rosen; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  MicroRNA prognostic signature for nodal metastases and survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew Feber; Liqiang Xi; Arjun Pennathur; William E Gooding; Santhoshi Bandla; Maoxin Wu; James D Luketich; Tony E Godfrey; Virginia R Litle
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Esophagectomy--it's not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Sonia Kunz; Drew Schembre; Henry Otero; Tom Malpass; Alex Hsi; Guobin Song; Richard Hinke; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma: A Potential Biomarker for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Egyud; Mohamedtaki Tejani; Arjun Pennathur; James Luketich; Praveen Sridhar; Emiko Yamada; Anders Ståhlberg; Stefan Filges; Paul Krzyzanowski; Jennifer Jackson; Irina Kalatskaya; Wei Jiao; Gradon Nielsen; Zhongren Zhou; Virginia Litle; Lincoln Stein; Tony Godfrey
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Dessislava Stefanova; Koby Herman; Prasad S Adusumilli; Manjit S Bains; Matthew J Bott; James M Isbell; Yelena Y Janjigian; Geoffrey Y Ku; Bernard J Park; Abraham J Wu; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Esophageal Cancer Treatment Is Underutilized Among Elderly Patients in the USA.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Miloslawa Stem; Amanda L Blackford; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.