Literature DB >> 25311569

Effects of flip angle uncertainty and noise on the accuracy of DCE-MRI metrics: comparison between standard concentration-based and signal difference methods.

Ping Wang1, Yiqun Xue2, Xia Zhao2, Jiangsheng Yu2, Mark Rosen3, Hee Kwon Song4.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is becoming an increasingly important tool to assess tumors and their response to treatment. In the most common method of computing tumor perfusion parameters, the concentration of the injected contrast agent is first computed in both tumor and blood which is subsequently fit to a perfusion model, typically the Tofts two compartment model. However, this strategy can be highly sensitive to errors in the excitation flip angle and noise. More recently, a simpler method of determining perfusion was developed in which the difference signal, obtained by subtracting the measured time course signal by the signal prior to bolus arrival, is utilized in lieu of the concentration values. The goal of this work is to compare the performance of these two strategies with simulation experiments in the presence of flip angle errors and different levels of image signal to noise ratios (SNRs). Results show that with the conventional method, if assumed pre-contrast T1 of blood is used, large errors in perfusion (exceeding 400% and 200% for K(trans) and ve, respectively) can occur in the presence of flip angle deviations typically observed in vivo. However, when baseline T1 values are measured for both tumor and blood, the errors become a function of flip angle difference between the two locations, with nearly no error if the flip angle errors are identical at both locations. The errors are substantially smaller with the signal difference strategy (less than 100% for both K(trans) and ve). The latter method also yields more consistent perfusion values at varying SNR levels. The results suggest that measuring the actual flip angle may be critical for obtaining absolute perfusion values, but in studies in which relative changes in perfusion is of primary interest or if true flip angles are not known, the signal difference strategy may be preferred over the standard concentration-based method.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI); K(trans); Perfusion; Signal difference method

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311569      PMCID: PMC4268181          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  21 in total

1.  Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Brian M Dale; John A Jesberger; Jonathan S Lewin; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  G Brix; W Semmler; R Port; L R Schad; G Layer; W J Lorenz
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T.

Authors:  P Di Giovanni; C A Azlan; T S Ahearn; S I Semple; F J Gilbert; T W Redpath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Stephanie B Donaldson; Catharine M L West; Susan E Davidson; Bernadette M Carrington; Gillian Hutchison; Andrew P Jones; Steven P Sourbron; David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times with FLASH for dynamic MRI of the breast.

Authors:  J A Brookes; T W Redpath; F J Gilbert; G Needham; A D Murray
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging.

Authors:  E K Fram; R J Herfkens; G A Johnson; G H Glover; J P Karis; A Shimakawa; T G Perkins; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  B1 transmission-field inhomogeneity and enhancement ratio errors in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast at 3T.

Authors:  Che A Azlan; Pierluigi Di Giovanni; Trevor S Ahearn; Scott I K Semple; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas W Redpath
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Quantitation of blood-brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors.

Authors:  H B Larsson; M Stubgaard; J L Frederiksen; M Jensen; O Henriksen; O B Paulson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Crohn's Disease: An Observational Comparison Study.

Authors:  Rune Wilkens; David A Peters; Agnete H Nielsen; Valeriya P Hovgaard; Henning Glerup; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-02

2.  Motion-robust cardiac B1+ mapping at 3T using interleaved bloch-siegert shifts.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Fabian Zimmer; Gregory J Metzger; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Demonstration of DCE-MRI as an early pharmacodynamic biomarker of response to VEGF Trap in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Allison F O'Neill; Lei Qin; Patrick Y Wen; John F de Groot; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey T Yap
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Fast B1 Mapping Based on Double-Angle Method with T1 Correction Using Standard Pulse Sequence.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ishimori; Takeshi Shimanuki; Tomoya Kobayashi; Masahiko Monma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.