Literature DB >> 20009182

The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T.

P Di Giovanni1, C A Azlan, T S Ahearn, S I Semple, F J Gilbert, T W Redpath.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to quantify the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of breast cancer at 3 T in relation to three sources of error. Individually, T1 measurement error, temporal resolution and transmitted RF field inhomogeneity are considered. Dynamic contrast enhancement curves were simulated using standard acquisition parameters of a DCE-MRI protocol. Errors on pre-contrast T1 due to incorrect RF spoiling were considered. Flip angle errors were measured and introduced into the fitting routine, and temporal resolution was also varied. The error in fitted pharmacokinetic parameters, K(trans) and v(e), was calculated. Flip angles were found to be reduced by up to 55% of the expected value. The resultant errors in our range of K(trans) and v(e) were found to be up to 66% and 74%, respectively. Incorrect T1 estimation results in K(trans) and v(e) errors up to 531% and 233%, respectively. When the temporal resolution is reduced from 10 to 70 s K(trans) drops by up to 48%, while v(e) shows negligible variation. In combination, uncertainties in tissue T1 map and applied flip angle were shown to contribute to errors of up to 88% in K(trans) and 73% in v(e). These results demonstrate the importance of high temporal resolution, accurate T1 measurement and good B1 homogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20009182     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Precision analysis of kinetic modelling estimates in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Dieter De Naeyer; Yves De Deene; Wim P Ceelen; Patrick Segers; Pascal Verdonck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Review of treatment assessment using DCE-MRI in breast cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Chun-Hao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; Janet Horton; Zheng Chang
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Repeatability of dynamic contrast enhanced vp parameter in healthy subjects and patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Moran Artzi; Gilad Liberman; Deborah T Blumenthal; Felix Bokstein; Orna Aizenstein; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Propagation of error from parameter constraints in quantitative MRI: Example application of multiple spin echo T2 mapping.

Authors:  Christopher L Lankford; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Radiofrequency transmit calibration: A multi-center evaluation of vendor-provided radiofrequency transmit mapping methods.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; Xinran Zhong; Yi Guo; Michael Boss; Ryan Bosca; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Kyunghyun Sung; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xin Li; Yiyi Chen; Xia Li; Ming-Ching Chang; Matthew J Oborski; Dariya I Malyarenko; Mark Muzi; Guido H Jajamovich; Andriy Fedorov; Alina Tudorica; Sandeep N Gupta; Charles M Laymon; Kenneth I Marro; Hadrien A Dyvorne; James V Miller; Daniel P Barbodiak; Thomas L Chenevert; Thomas E Yankeelov; James M Mountz; Paul E Kinahan; Ron Kikinis; Bachir Taouli; Fiona Fennessy; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Effects of flip angle uncertainty and noise on the accuracy of DCE-MRI metrics: comparison between standard concentration-based and signal difference methods.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Yiqun Xue; Xia Zhao; Jiangsheng Yu; Mark Rosen; Hee Kwon Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Accelerated Brain DCE-MRI Using Iterative Reconstruction With Total Generalized Variation Penalty for Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; John P Kirkpatrick; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-23

9.  The impact of reliable prebolus T 1 measurements or a fixed T 1 value in the assessment of glioma patients with dynamic contrast enhancing MRI.

Authors:  Anna Tietze; Kim Mouridsen; Irene Klærke Mikkelsen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  A linear algorithm of the reference region model for DCE-MRI is robust and relaxes requirements for temporal resolution.

Authors:  Julio Cárdenas-Rodríguez; Christine M Howison; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.