PURPOSE: To quantify B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity in breast imaging of normal volunteers at 3T using 3D T(1)-weighted spoiled gradient echo and to assess the resulting errors in enhancement ratio (ER) measured in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) studies of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 volunteers underwent breast imaging at 3T and the B(1) transmission-fields were mapped. Gel phantoms that simulate pre- and postcontrast breast tissue T(1) were developed. The effects of B(1)-field inhomogeneity on ER, as measured using a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence, were investigated by computer simulation and experiments on gel phantoms. RESULTS: It was observed that by using the patient orientation and MR scanner employed in this study, the B(1) transmission-field field is always reduced toward the volunteer's right side. The median B(1)-field in the right breast is reduced around 40% of the expected B(1)-field. For some volunteers the amplitude was reduced by more than 50%. Computer simulation and experiment showed that a reduction in B(1)-field decreases ER. This reduction increases with both B(1)-field error and contrast agent uptake. CONCLUSION: B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity is a critical issue in breast imaging at 3T and causes errors in quantifying ER. These errors would be sufficient to reduce the conspicuity of a malignant lesion and could result in reduced sensitivity for cancer detection. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To quantify B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity in breast imaging of normal volunteers at 3T using 3D T(1)-weighted spoiled gradient echo and to assess the resulting errors in enhancement ratio (ER) measured in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) studies of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 volunteers underwent breast imaging at 3T and the B(1) transmission-fields were mapped. Gel phantoms that simulate pre- and postcontrast breast tissue T(1) were developed. The effects of B(1)-field inhomogeneity on ER, as measured using a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence, were investigated by computer simulation and experiments on gel phantoms. RESULTS: It was observed that by using the patient orientation and MR scanner employed in this study, the B(1) transmission-field field is always reduced toward the volunteer's right side. The median B(1)-field in the right breast is reduced around 40% of the expected B(1)-field. For some volunteers the amplitude was reduced by more than 50%. Computer simulation and experiment showed that a reduction in B(1)-field decreases ER. This reduction increases with both B(1)-field error and contrast agent uptake. CONCLUSION: B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity is a critical issue in breast imaging at 3T and causes errors in quantifying ER. These errors would be sufficient to reduce the conspicuity of a malignant lesion and could result in reduced sensitivity for cancer detection. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge; Wendy B Demartini; Robert L Gutierrez; Sana Parsian; Constance D Lehman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yong Chen; Ananya Panda; Shivani Pahwa; Jesse I Hamilton; Sara Dastmalchian; Debra F McGivney; Dan Ma; Joshua Batesole; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark A Griswold; Donna Plecha; Vikas Gulani Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yannick Bliesener; Xinran Zhong; Yi Guo; Michael Boss; Ryan Bosca; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Kyunghyun Sung; Krishna S Nayak Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: J Oncol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.375