Literature DB >> 25302251

Effective use of pause procedure to enhance student engagement and learning.

Rachna Bachhel1, Richa Ghay Thaman2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Active learning strategies have been documented to enhance learning. We created an active learning environment in neuromuscular physiology lectures for first year medical students by using 'Pause Procedure'.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty medical students class is divided into two Groups (Group A and Group B) and taught in different classes. Each lecture of group A (experimental Group) undergraduate first year medical students was divided into short presentations of 12-15 min each. Each presentation was followed by a pause of 2-3min, three times in a 50 min lecture. During the pauses students worked in pairs to discuss and rework their notes. Any queries were directed towards the teacher and discussed forthwith. At the end of each lecture students were given 2-3 minutes to write down the key points they remembered about the lecture (free-recall). Fifteen days after completion of the lectures a 30 item MCQ test was administered to measure long term recall. Group B (control Group) received the same lectures without the use of pause procedure and was similarly tested.
RESULTS: Experimental Group students did significantly better on the MCQ test (p-value<0.05) in comparison to the control Group. Most of the students (83.6%) agreed that the 'pause procedure' helped them to enhance lecture recall.
CONCLUSION: Pause procedure is a good active learning strategy which helps students review their notes, reflect on them, discuss and explain the key ideas with their partners. Moreover, it requires only 6-7 min of the classroom time and can significantly enhance student learning.

Keywords:  Active learning strategies; Control group; Experimental group; Long term recall; Pause procedure

Year:  2014        PMID: 25302251      PMCID: PMC4190777          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8260.4691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  6 in total

1.  Active learning of respiratory physiology improves performance on respiratory physiology examinations.

Authors:  S P Rao; S E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Teaching in the medical setting: balancing teaching styles, learning styles and teaching methods.

Authors:  Lisa Vaughn; Raymond Baker
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Comparative evaluation of active learning and the traditional lectures in physiology: a case study of 200 level medical laboratory students of Imo State Unversity, Owerri.

Authors:  U S B Anyaehie; Ed Nwobodo; C J Njoku; G A Inah
Journal:  Niger J Physiol Sci       Date:  2007 Jun-Dec

4.  Too much content, not enough thinking, and too little fun!

Authors:  Stephen E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Adopting role plays/skits to enhance the learning of clinical respiratory physiology.

Authors:  Richa Ghay Thaman; Anterpreet Kaur Arora
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Medical student concentration during lectures.

Authors:  J Stuart; R J Rutherford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Use of Stuffed Microbes in an Undergraduate Microbiology Course Increases Engagement and Student Learning.

Authors:  Ginny Webb
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Virtual flipped teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Chaya Gopalan; Carolyn Butts-Wilmsmeyer; Vanessa Moran
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Introducing multiple-choice questions to promote learning for medical students: effect on exam performance in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Sebastian M Jud; Susanne Cupisti; Wolfgang Frobenius; Andrea Winkler; Franziska Schultheis; Sophia Antoniadis; Matthias W Beckmann; Felix Heindl
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.