Literature DB >> 25301325

What Black Women Know and Want to Know About Counseling and Testing for BRCA1/2.

Inez Adams1, Juleen Christopher, Karen Patricia Williams, Vanessa B Sheppard.   

Abstract

Black women are just as likely to have hereditary breast cancer mutations as White women, yet their participation in genetic counseling and testing is substantially lower. This study sought to describe Black women's awareness and perceptions of BRCA1/2 testing and to identify barriers and motivators to seeking BRCA1/2 services. Fifty intercept interviews were conducted with Black women in public places (a professional women's basketball game, a grocery store, a faith-based community event, and the waiting area at a breast care clinic) in Washington, DC. More than half of the women (54%) were aware that genetic tests to determine risk for certain breast and ovarian cancers exist, but the majority (88%) had never heard of BRCA1/2, specifically. After hearing a description of BRCA1/2 genetic markers, 82% stated that they would agree to BRCA1/2 testing if it was offered to them. Perceived advantages of testing included cancer prevention and the ability to share information with family members. Perceived disadvantages included emotional distress associated with identification of the mutation and the potential misuse of results to deny healthcare or employment. Physician recommendation, self-care, and known family history were among the motivators for testing. Women listed possible media and venues for intervention. In spite of low rates of BRCA1/2 testing in the Black community, women in this sample were open to the idea. Interventions that address barriers and include cultural tailoring are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25301325      PMCID: PMC4393763          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0740-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  72 in total

1.  Claiming health: mammography screening decision making of African American women.

Authors:  Barbara A Fowler
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  Clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  S M Domchek; B L Weber
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Attitudes of African American and low socioeconomic status white women toward medical research.

Authors:  Deborah F Farmer; Sharon A Jackson; Fabian Camacho; Mark A Hall
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2007-02

4.  The influence of social support relationships on mammography screening in African-American women.

Authors:  Barbara Ann Fowler
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2007-07

5.  Meta-analysis of survival in African American and white American patients with breast cancer: ethnicity compared with socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman; Kent A Griffith; Ismail Jatoi; Michael S Simon; Joseph P Crowe; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  How do women decide? Accepting or declining BRCA1/2 testing in a nationwide clinical sample in the United States.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Paul Root Wolpe; Nora L Jones; Mildred Cho
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2006

8.  Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Lina Jandorf; William Redd
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-11

9.  Attitudes toward participation in breast cancer randomized clinical trials in the African American community: a focus group study.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Lisa M Reisch; Alton Hart; Margaret A Harrington; Connie Nakano; J Carey Jackson; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Psychosocial correlates of mammography screening in older African American women.

Authors:  Deborah Farmer; Bobbie Reddick; Ralph D'Agostino; Sharon A Jackson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christina D Williams; Alyssa Jasmine Bullard; Meghan O'Leary; Reana Thomas; Thomas S Redding; Karen Goldstein
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-04-08

2.  Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anne Weidner; Courtney Lewis; Devon Bonner; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Dana Ketcher; Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Deborah Cragun; Jongphil Kim; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Cheryl L Knott; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Care delivery considerations for widespread and equitable implementation of inherited cancer predisposition testing.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Anita Y Kinney; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 6.  The Role of Safety-Net Hospitals in Reducing Disparities in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Angelena Crown; Kalpana Ramiah; Bruce Siegel; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Juan L Rodriguez; Nikki A Hawkins; Ashwini Soman; Mary C White; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Scott Kelly; Rachel H Nusbaum; Morgan Similuk; Tiffani A DeMarco; Gillian W Hooker; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea D Forman; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Claire Davis; Shelley R McCormick; Wendy McKinnon; Kristi D Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Judy Garber; Marie Wood; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Disparities in Genetic Testing and Care among Black women with Hereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sonya Reid; Sydney Cadiz; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-05-19

10.  Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Berrigan; Jasmine Austrie; Aaron Fleishman; Kenneth P Tercyak; Martin R Pollak; Martha Pavlakis; Vinayak Rohan; Prabhakar K Baliga; Liise K Kayler; Thomas H Feeley; James R Rodrigue
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.