| Literature DB >> 25297839 |
D R Crosslin1, D S Carrell2, A Burt3, D S Kim1, J G Underwood4, D S Hanna4, B A Comstock5, E Baldwin2, M de Andrade6, I J Kullo7, G Tromp8, H Kuivaniemi8, K M Borthwick8, C A McCarty9, P L Peissig10, K F Doheny11, E Pugh11, A Kho12, J Pacheco12, M G Hayes13, M D Ritchie14, S S Verma14, G Armstrong14, S Stallings15, J C Denny15, R J Carroll15, D C Crawford16, P K Crane17, S Mukherjee17, E Bottinger18, R Li19, B Keating20, D B Mirel21, C S Carlson22, J B Harley23, E B Larson2, G P Jarvik1.
Abstract
Herpes zoster, commonly referred to as shingles, is caused by the varicella zoster virus (VZV). VZV initially manifests as chicken pox, most commonly in childhood, can remain asymptomatically latent in nerve tissues for many years and often re-emerges as shingles. Although reactivation may be related to immune suppression, aging and female sex, most inter-individual variability in re-emergence risk has not been explained to date. We performed a genome-wide association analyses in 22,981 participants (2280 shingles cases) from the electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network. Using Cox survival and logistic regression, we identified a genomic region in the combined and European ancestry groups that has an age of onset effect reaching genome-wide significance (P>1.0 × 10(-8)). This region tags the non-coding gene HCP5 (HLA Complex P5) in the major histocompatibility complex. This gene is an endogenous retrovirus and likely influences viral activity through regulatory functions. Variants in this genetic region are known to be associated with delay in development of AIDS in people infected by HIV. Our study provides further suggestion that this region may have a critical role in viral suppression and could potentially harbor a clinically actionable variant for the shingles vaccine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25297839 PMCID: PMC4308645 DOI: 10.1038/gene.2014.51
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Immun ISSN: 1466-4879 Impact factor: 2.676
Summary statistics of demographic data and phenotypes by eMERGE participating site and combined
| N | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Geisinger | 10% (222) | 13% (2696) | 13% (2918) |
| Group Health/UW | 25% (572) | 12% (2475) | 13% (3047) |
| Mayo Clinic | 13% (291) | 22% (4523) | 21% (4814) |
| Marshfield | 32% (720) | 12% (2543) | 14% (3263) |
| Mt Sinai | 7% (157) | 15% (3095) | 14% (3252) |
| Northwestern | 6% (127) | 10% (1974) | 9% (2101) |
| Vanderbilt | 8% (191) | 16% (3395) | 16% (3586) |
| Sex (female) | 61% (1 387) | 55% (11 443) | 56% (12 830) |
| Median BMI (kg m−2) | 24.7, 27.9, 31.7 | 25.2, 28.8, 33.6 | 25.1, 28.7, 33.4 |
| Censored age | 57, 67, 77 | 56, 66, 77 | 56, 66, 77 |
| African | 8% (173) | 16% (3312) | 15% (3485) |
| European | 88% (2 016) | 79% (16 407) | 80% (18 423) |
| Hispanic | 2% (41) | 2% (580) | 2% (621) |
| 5% (103) | 2% (377) | 2% (480) | |
| Chemotherapy (yes) | 7% (164) | 6% (1213) | 6% (1377) |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; eMERGE, electronic Medical Records and Genomics. The three numbers for BMI and age represent quartiles of the distributions (25th, 50th and 75th).
Summary of effects of loci that reached genome-wide significance for the joint (n=22 981, survival=25 986) and European ancestry (n=18 423, survival=22 679) analyses
| P | P | P | P | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | rs114045064 | C | 31332239 | 0.18 | 2.75 × 10−7 | 5.06 × 10−9 | 6.70 × 10−6 (17.51) | 2.24 × 10−8 (17.14) | Upstream | |
| 0.81 (0.75–0.88) | 0.77 (0.71–0.85) | 0.82 (0.75–0.89) | 0.78 (0.71–0.85) | |||||||
| 6 | rs112660930 | T | 31332078 | 0.18 | 3.01 × 10−7 | 5.26 × 10−9 | 7.69 × 10−6 (17.57) | 2.56 × 10−7 (17.16) | Upstream | |
| 0.81 (0.75–0.88) | 0.77 (0.71–0.85) | 0.82 (0.75–0.89) | 0.78 (0.71–0.86) | |||||||
| 6 | rs116062713 | C | 31433566 | 0.08 | 5.22 × 10−8 | 1.04 × 10−7 | 1.75 × 10−6 (7.82) | 5.52 × 10−6 (9.07) | Upstream | |
| 0.72 (0.65–0.82) | 0.73 (0.64–0.82) | 0.73 (0.65–0.83) | 0.74 (0.65–0.84) | |||||||
| 6 | rs114864815 | T | 31428987 | 0.08 | 4.54 × 10−8 | 6.94 × 10−8 | 1.19 × 10−6 (7.69) | 3.68 × 10−6 (9.14) | 3′ UTR | |
| 0.73 (0.65–0.82) | 0.73 (0.64–0.82) | 0.73 (0.65–0.83) | 0.74 (0.65–0.84) |
Abbreviations: BP, base pair; CI, confidence interval; HCP5, HLA Complex P5; HR, hazards ratio; MAF, minor allele frequency; NA, not available; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; UTR, untranslated region. The African ancestry and Hispanic analyses included 3460 and 584 participants, respectively. Actual numbers for the analyses may be different due to missing phenotype and/or covariate data. The BP positions are defined from the GRCh37/hg19 build. Both rs116062713 and rs114864815 did not meet the MAF threshold for the African ancestry and Hispanic analyses. The HapMap abbreviations are defined as follows: (1) CEPH (Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe) (abbreviation: CEU); (2) Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (abbreviation: YRI); and (3) Han Chinese in Beijing, China (abbreviation: CHB); and Japanese in Tokyo, Japan (abbreviation: JPT). For HapMap allele frequencies, each SNP was merged into the corresponding variant: (1) rs114045064 was merged into rs2596551; (2) rs112660930 was merged into rs2596550; and (3) rs116062713 was merged into rs75640364; and rs114864815 was merged into rs77349273.
Figure 1Manhattan plot of P-values generated using Cox regression analysis in the joint ancestry sample.
Figure 2Manhattan plot of P-values generated using Cox regression analysis in the European ancestry sample.
Figure 3Regional LD plot using the SNP Annotation and Proxy Search software.[25]