Literature DB >> 27497800

Evaluating electronic health record data sources and algorithmic approaches to identify hypertensive individuals.

Pedro L Teixeira1, Wei-Qi Wei1, Robert M Cronin1, Huan Mo1, Jacob P VanHouten1,2, Robert J Carroll1, Eric LaRose3, Lisa A Bastarache1, S Trent Rosenbloom1,4, Todd L Edwards1, Dan M Roden4,5, Thomas A Lasko1, Richard A Dart6, Anne M Nikolai3, Peggy L Peissig3, Joshua C Denny7,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Phenotyping algorithms applied to electronic health record (EHR) data enable investigators to identify large cohorts for clinical and genomic research. Algorithm development is often iterative, depends on fallible investigator intuition, and is time- and labor-intensive. We developed and evaluated 4 types of phenotyping algorithms and categories of EHR information to identify hypertensive individuals and controls and provide a portable module for implementation at other sites.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the EHRs of 631 individuals followed at Vanderbilt for hypertension status. We developed features and phenotyping algorithms of increasing complexity. Input categories included International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD9) codes, medications, vital signs, narrative-text search results, and Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts extracted using natural language processing (NLP). We developed a module and tested portability by replicating 10 of the best-performing algorithms at the Marshfield Clinic.
RESULTS: Random forests using billing codes, medications, vitals, and concepts had the best performance with a median area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.976. Normalized sums of all 4 categories also performed well (0.959 AUC). The best non-NLP algorithm combined normalized ICD9 codes, medications, and blood pressure readings with a median AUC of 0.948. Blood pressure cutoffs or ICD9 code counts alone had AUCs of 0.854 and 0.908, respectively. Marshfield Clinic results were similar.
CONCLUSION: This work shows that billing codes or blood pressure readings alone yield good hypertension classification performance. However, even simple combinations of input categories improve performance. The most complex algorithms classified hypertension with excellent recall and precision.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; hypertension; machine learning; natural language processing; phenotyping algorithms; random forests

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27497800      PMCID: PMC5201185          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  36 in total

1.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  "Understanding" medical school curriculum content using KnowledgeMap.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Jeffrey D Smithers; Randolph A Miller; Anderson Spickard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Automated identification of adverse events related to central venous catheters.

Authors:  Janet F E Penz; Adam B Wilcox; John F Hurdle
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R.

Authors:  Tobias Sing; Oliver Sander; Niko Beerenwinkel; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Identifying QT prolongation from ECG impressions using a general-purpose Natural Language Processor.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Randolph A Miller; Lemuel Russell Waitman; Mark A Arrieta; Joshua F Peterson
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  MedEx: a medication information extraction system for clinical narratives.

Authors:  Hua Xu; Shane P Stenner; Son Doan; Kevin B Johnson; Lemuel R Waitman; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.

Authors:  D M Roden; J M Pulley; M A Basford; G R Bernard; E W Clayton; J R Balser; D R Masys
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Evaluation of a method to identify and categorize section headers in clinical documents.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Anderson Spickard; Kevin B Johnson; Neeraja B Peterson; Josh F Peterson; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors.

Authors:  Elena Birman-Deych; Amy D Waterman; Yan Yan; David S Nilasena; Martha J Radford; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988-1994 and 1999-2004.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Cutler; Paul D Sorlie; Michael Wolz; Thomas Thom; Larry E Fields; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of Use of Technologies to Facilitate Medical Chart Review.

Authors:  Loreen Straub; Joshua J Gagne; Judith C Maro; Michael D Nguyen; Nicolas Beaulieu; Jeffrey S Brown; Adee Kennedy; Margaret Johnson; Adam Wright; Li Zhou; Shirley V Wang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Development and Validation of an Electronic Medical Record Algorithm to Identify Phenotypes of Rotator Cuff Tear.

Authors:  Chan Gao; Run Fan; Gregory D Ayers; Ayush Giri; Kindred Harris; Ravi Atreya; Pedro L Teixeira; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Differential Associations of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases With Incident Heart Failure.

Authors:  Sameer Prasada; Adovich Rivera; Arvind Nishtala; Anna E Pawlowski; Arjun Sinha; Joshua D Bundy; Simran A Chadha; Faraz S Ahmad; Sadiya S Khan; Chad Achenbach; Frank J Palella; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Yvonne C Lee; Jonathan I Silverberg; Babafemi O Taiwo; Sanjiv J Shah; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Matthew J Feinstein
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 4.  Making Sense of Big Textual Data for Health Care: Findings from the Section on Clinical Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  A Névéol; P Zweigenbaum
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  The emerging landscape of health research based on biobanks linked to electronic health records: Existing resources, statistical challenges, and potential opportunities.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Maxwell Salvatore; Lars G Fritsche; Anita Pandit; Arvind Rao; Chad Brummett; Cristen J Willer; Lynda D Lisabeth; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Improving the phenotype risk score as a scalable approach to identifying patients with Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Lisa Bastarache; Jacob J Hughey; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Julie A Bastraache; Satya Das; Neil Charles Zaki; Chenjie Zeng; Leigh Anne Tang; Dan M Roden; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Phenome-wide association studies: a new method for functional genomics in humans.

Authors:  Dan M Roden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Human monocyte transcriptional profiling identifies IL-18 receptor accessory protein and lactoferrin as novel immune targets in hypertension.

Authors:  Matthew R Alexander; Allison E Norlander; Fernando Elijovich; Ravi V Atreya; Amadou Gaye; Juan S Gnecco; Cheryl L Laffer; Cristi L Galindo; Meena S Madhur
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Identifying hypertension in pregnancy using electronic medical records: The importance of blood pressure values.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Susan M Shortreed; Thomas Easterling; T Craig Cheetham; Kristi Reynolds; Lyndsay A Avalos; Aruna Kamineni; Victoria Holt; Romain Neugebauer; Mary Akosile; Nerissa Nance; Zoe Bider-Canfield; Rod L Walker; Sylvia E Badon; Sascha Dublin
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 10.  Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.

Authors:  Zexian Zeng; Yu Deng; Xiaoyu Li; Tristan Naumann; Yuan Luo
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.