Literature DB >> 21852297

Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007).

Gagan Kumar1, Nilay Kumar2, Amit Taneja1, Thomas Kaleekal1, Sergey Tarima3, Emily McGinley3, Edgar Jimenez4, Anand Mohan4, Rumi Ahmed Khan4, Jeff Whittle5, Elizabeth Jacobs1, Rahul Nanchal6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis is common and often fatal. The expanding armamentarium of evidence-based therapies has improved the outcomes of persons with this disease. However, the existing national estimates of the frequency and outcomes of severe sepsis were made before many of the recent therapeutic advances. Therefore, it is important to study the outcomes of this disease in an aging US population with rising comorbidities.
METHODS: We used the Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to estimate the frequency and outcomes of severe sepsis hospitalizations between 2000 and 2007. We identified hospitalizations for severe sepsis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes indicating the presence of sepsis and organ system failure. Using weights from NIS, we estimated the number of hospitalizations for severe sepsis in each year. We combined these with census data to determine the number of severe sepsis hospitalizations per 100,000 persons. We used discharge status to identify in-hospital mortality and compared mortality rates in 2000 with those in 2007 after adjusting for demographics, number of organ systems failing, and presence of comorbid conditions.
RESULTS: The number of severe sepsis hospitalizations per 100,000 persons increased from 143 in 2000 to 343 in 2007. The mean number of organ system failures during admission increased from 1.6 to 1.9 (P < .001). The mean length of hospital stay decreased from 17.3 to 14.9 days. The mortality rate decreased from 39% to 27%. However, more admissions ended with discharge to a long-term care facility in 2007 than in 2000 (35% vs 27%, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: An increasing number of admissions for severe sepsis combined with declining mortality rates contribute to more individuals surviving to hospital discharge. Importantly, this leads to more survivors being discharged to skilled nursing facilities and home with in-home care. Increased attention to this phenomenon is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852297     DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-0352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  224 in total

Review 1.  Mobilization in severe sepsis: an integrative review.

Authors:  Sushant Govindan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Andrew Odden; Scott A Flanders; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  A Descriptive Report of Early Mobilization for Critically Ill Ventilated Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Weeks; Claudine Campbell; Prabalini Rajendram; Weiji Shi; Louis Voigt
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2017-07

3.  Inhibition of contact-mediated activation of factor XI protects baboons against S aureus-induced organ damage and death.

Authors:  Robert Silasi; Ravi Shankar Keshari; Cristina Lupu; Walter Janse Van Rensburg; Hala Chaaban; Girija Regmi; Aleksandr Shamanaev; Joseph J Shatzel; Cristina Puy; Christina U Lorentz; Erik I Tucker; David Gailani; András Gruber; Owen J T McCarty; Florea Lupu
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-02-26

4.  [Severe infections : causes and management of sepsis].

Authors:  B Salzberger; F Hanses; G Birkenfeld; J Langgartner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  A novel C5a-neutralizing mirror-image (l-)aptamer prevents organ failure and improves survival in experimental sepsis.

Authors:  Kai Hoehlig; Christian Maasch; Nelli Shushakova; Klaus Buchner; Markus Huber-Lang; Werner G Purschke; Axel Vater; Sven Klussmann
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  The anti-inflammatory effect of combined complement and CD14 inhibition is preserved during escalating bacterial load.

Authors:  Kjetil H Egge; Andreas Barratt-Due; Stig Nymo; Julie K Lindstad; Anne Pharo; Corinna Lau; Terje Espevik; Ebbe B Thorgersen; Tom E Mollnes
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Severe sepsis cohorts derived from claims-based strategies appear to be biased toward a more severely ill patient population.

Authors:  Stacey-Ann Whittaker; Mark E Mikkelsen; David F Gaieski; Sherine Koshy; Craig Kean; Barry D Fuchs
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Triage sepsis alert and sepsis protocol lower times to fluids and antibiotics in the ED.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hayden; Rachel E Tuuri; Rachel Scott; Joseph D Losek; Aaron M Blackshaw; Andrew J Schoenling; Paul J Nietert; Greg A Hall
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Learning a Severity Score for Sepsis: A Novel Approach based on Clinical Comparisons.

Authors:  Kirill Dyagilev; Suchi Saria
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Raymund Dantes; Lauren Epstein; David J Murphy; Christopher W Seymour; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sameer S Kadri; Derek C Angus; Robert L Danner; Anthony E Fiore; John A Jernigan; Greg S Martin; Edward Septimus; David K Warren; Anita Karcz; Christina Chan; John T Menchaca; Rui Wang; Susan Gruber; Michael Klompas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.