BACKGROUND: The volume effect in pancreatic surgery is well established. Regionalization to high-volume centres has been proposed. The effect of this proposal on practice patterns is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective review of pancreatectomy patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004-2011. Inpatient mortality and complication rates were calculated. Patients were stratified by annual centre pancreatic resection volume (low <5, medium 5-18, high >18). Multivariable regression model evaluated predictors of resection at a high-volume centre. RESULTS: In total, 129,609 patients underwent a pancreatectomy. The crude inpatient mortality rate was 4.3%. 36.0% experienced complications. 66.5% underwent a resection at high-volume centres. In 2004, low-, medium- and high-volume centres resected 16.3%, 24.5% and 59.2% of patients, compared with 7.6%, 19.3% and 73.1% in 2011. High-volume centres had lower mortality (P < 0.001), fewer complications (P < 0.001) and a shorter median length of stay (P < 0.001). Patients at non-high-volume centres had more comorbidities (P = 0.001), lower rates of private insurance (P < 0.001) and more non-elective admissions (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: In spite of a shift to high-volume hospitals, a substantial cohort still receives a resection outside of these centres. Patients receiving non-high-volume care demonstrate less favourable comorbidities, insurance and urgency of operation. The implications are twofold: already disadvantaged patients may not benefit from the high-volume effect; and patients predisposed to do well may contribute to observed superior outcomes at high-volume centres.
BACKGROUND: The volume effect in pancreatic surgery is well established. Regionalization to high-volume centres has been proposed. The effect of this proposal on practice patterns is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective review of pancreatectomy patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004-2011. Inpatient mortality and complication rates were calculated. Patients were stratified by annual centre pancreatic resection volume (low <5, medium 5-18, high >18). Multivariable regression model evaluated predictors of resection at a high-volume centre. RESULTS: In total, 129,609 patients underwent a pancreatectomy. The crude inpatient mortality rate was 4.3%. 36.0% experienced complications. 66.5% underwent a resection at high-volume centres. In 2004, low-, medium- and high-volume centres resected 16.3%, 24.5% and 59.2% of patients, compared with 7.6%, 19.3% and 73.1% in 2011. High-volume centres had lower mortality (P < 0.001), fewer complications (P < 0.001) and a shorter median length of stay (P < 0.001). Patients at non-high-volume centres had more comorbidities (P = 0.001), lower rates of private insurance (P < 0.001) and more non-elective admissions (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: In spite of a shift to high-volume hospitals, a substantial cohort still receives a resection outside of these centres. Patients receiving non-high-volume care demonstrate less favourable comorbidities, insurance and urgency of operation. The implications are twofold: already disadvantaged patients may not benefit from the high-volume effect; and patients predisposed to do well may contribute to observed superior outcomes at high-volume centres.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jerome H Liu; David S Zingmond; Marcia L McGory; Nelson F SooHoo; Susan L Ettner; Robert H Brook; Clifford Y Ko Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James T McPhee; Joshua S Hill; Giles F Whalen; Maksim Zayaruzny; Demetrius E Litwin; Mary E Sullivan; Frederick A Anderson; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lindsay A Bliss; Catherine J Yang; Tara S Kent; Sing Chau Ng; Jonathan F Critchlow; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Benjamin D Powers; William Fulp; Amina Dhahri; Danielle K DePeralta; Takuya Ogami; Luke Rothermel; Jennifer B Permuth; Susan T Vadaparampil; Joon-Kyung Kim; Jose Pimiento; Pamela J Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Daniel A Anaya; Jason B Fleming Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Jose F Velez-Serrano; Daniel Velez-Serrano; Valentin Hernandez-Barrera; Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia; Ana Lopez de Andres; Pilar Carrasco Garrido; Alejandro Álvaro-Meca Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shamir O Cawich; Neil W Pearce; Vijay Naraynsingh; Parul Shukla; Rahul R Deshpande Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 1.534
Authors: Ugo Marchese; Martin Gaillard; Anna Pellat; Stylianos Tzedakis; Einas Abou Ali; Anthony Dohan; Maxime Barat; Philippe Soyer; David Fuks; Romain Coriat Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 6.639