Literature DB >> 25293952

On the RF heating of coronary stents at 7.0 Tesla MRI.

Lukas Winter1, Eva Oberacker1, Celal Özerdem1, Yiyi Ji1, Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff1,2, Gerd Weidemann3, Bernd Ittermann3, Frank Seifert3, Thoralf Niendorf1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examine radiofrequency (RF) induced heating of coronary stents at 7.0 Tesla (T) to derive an analytical approach which supports RF heating assessment of arbitrary stent geometries and RF coils.
METHODS: Simulations are performed to detail electromagnetic fields (EMF), local specific absorption rates (SAR) and temperature changes. For validation E-field measurements and RF heating experiments are conducted. To progress to clinical setups RF coils tailored for cardiac MRI at 7.0T and coronary stents are incorporated into EMF simulations using a human voxel model.
RESULTS: Our simulations of coronary stents at 297 MHz were confirmed by E-field and temperature measurements. An analytical solution which describes SAR(1g tissue voxel) induced by an arbitrary coronary stent interfering with E-fields generated by an arbitrary RF coil was derived. The analytical approach yielded a conservative estimation of induced SAR(1g tissue voxel) maxima without the need for integrating the stent into EMF simulations of the human voxel model.
CONCLUSION: The proposed analytical approach can be applied for any patient, coronary stent type, RF coil configuration and RF transmission regime. The generalized approach is of value for RF heating assessment of other passive electrically conductive implants and provides a novel design criterion for RF coils.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RF heating; RF power deposition; coronary stents; specific absorption rate; ultrahigh field MR

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25293952     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  12 in total

1.  Experience with magnetic resonance imaging of human subjects with passive implants and tattoos at 7 T: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yacine Noureddine; Andreas K Bitz; Mark E Ladd; Markus Thürling; Susanne C Ladd; Gregor Schaefers; Oliver Kraff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  [Safety of implants in high field and ultrahigh field MRI].

Authors:  O Kraff; H H Quick
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close-fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; Maria Ida Iacono; Husam Katnani; Lawrence L Wald; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Risk assessment of copper-containing contraceptives: the impact for women with implanted intrauterine devices during clinical MRI and CT examinations.

Authors:  Wiebke Neumann; Tanja Uhrig; Matthias Malzacher; Verena Kossmann; Lothar R Schad; Frank G Zoellner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Thermal magnetic resonance: physics considerations and electromagnetic field simulations up to 23.5 Tesla (1GHz).

Authors:  Lukas Winter; Celal Oezerdem; Werner Hoffmann; Tessa van de Lindt; Joao Periquito; Yiyi Ji; Pirus Ghadjar; Volker Budach; Peter Wust; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  On the subjective acceptance during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Sabrina Klix; Antje Els; Katharina Paul; Andreas Graessl; Celal Oezerdem; Oliver Weinberger; Lukas Winter; Christof Thalhammer; Till Huelnhagen; Jan Rieger; Heidrun Mehling; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  High Spatial Resolution Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance at 7.0 Tesla in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy - First Experiences: Lesson Learned from 7.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marcel Prothmann; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Agnieszka Töpper; Matthias A Dieringer; Etham Shahid; Andreas Graessl; Jan Rieger; Darius Lysiak; C Thalhammer; Till Huelnhagen; Peter Kellman; Thoralf Niendorf; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Local Multi-Channel RF Surface Coil versus Body RF Coil Transmission for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 3 Tesla: Which Configuration Is Winning the Game?

Authors:  Oliver Weinberger; Lukas Winter; Matthias A Dieringer; Antje Els; Celal Oezerdem; Jan Rieger; Andre Kuehne; Antonino M Cassara; Harald Pfeiffer; Friedrich Wetterling; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Open Source 3D Multipurpose Measurement System with Submillimetre Fidelity and First Application in Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Haopeng Han; Raphael Moritz; Eva Oberacker; Helmar Waiczies; Thoralf Niendorf; Lukas Winter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.