Literature DB >> 24046379

Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits.

Nils P Johnson1, Richard L Kirkeeide, K Lance Gould.   

Abstract

Keywords:  coronary circulation; coronary stenosis; models, cardiovascular; myocardial fractional flow reserve

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24046379     DOI： 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN： 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  Association of coronary plaque burden with fractional flow reserve: should we keep attempting to derive physiology from anatomy?

Authors:  Thura T Abd; Richard T George
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-02

2.  Angiographically insignificant yet ischemia-causing coronary lesions: a case for routine use of invasive physiologic testing during diagnostic cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Richard G Bach
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Is there a role for fractional flow reserve in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) planning?

Authors:  Amir Ahmadi; Dylan Stanger; John Puskas; David Taggart; Y Chandrashekhar; Jagat Narula
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

Review 4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in ischemic cardiomyopathy: an update.

Authors:  Fernanda Boldrini Assunção; Diogo Costa Leandro de Oliveira; Vitor Frauches Souza; Marcelo Souto Nacif
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Disentangling the Gordian knot of local metabolic control of coronary blood flow.

Authors:  Johnathan D Tune; Adam G Goodwill; Alexander M Kiel; Hana E Baker; Shawn B Bender; Daphne Merkus; Dirk J Duncker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Functional Versus Anatomic Imaging of CAD: Lessons Learned from Recent Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Lili Liu; Wenjie Yang; Yasuomi Nagahara; Yingguang Li; Saeb R Lamooki; Takashi Muramatsu; Pieter Kitslaar; Masayoshi Sarai; Yukio Ozaki; Peter Barlis; Fuhua Yan; Johan H C Reiber; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Physiology and coronary artery disease: emerging insights from computed tomography imaging based computational modeling.

Authors:  Parastou Eslami; Vikas Thondapu; Julia Karady; Eline M J Hartman; Zexi Jin; Mazen Albaghdadi; Michael Lu; Jolanda J Wentzel; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Accelerated Estimation of Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Pressure Gradients with Distributed Lumped Parameter Modeling vs. 3D CFD with Instantaneous Adaptive Mesh Refinement: Experimental Validation in Swine.

Authors:  Ryan Pewowaruk; Luke Lamers; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Jun Chen; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.316
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.