Literature DB >> 25286912

Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.

Martin V Day1, Susan T Fiske2, Emily L Downing3, Thomas E Trail4.   

Abstract

People's social and political opinions are grounded in their moral concerns about right and wrong. We examine whether five moral foundations--harm, fairness, ingroup, authority, and purity--can influence political attitudes of liberals and conservatives across a variety of issues. Framing issues using moral foundations may change political attitudes in at least two possible ways: (a) Entrenching: Relevant moral foundations will strengthen existing political attitudes when framing pro-attitudinal issues (e.g., conservatives exposed to a free-market economic stance) and (b) Persuasion: Mere presence of relevant moral foundations may also alter political attitudes in counter-attitudinal directions (e.g., conservatives exposed to an economic regulation stance). Studies 1 and 2 support the entrenching hypothesis. Relevant moral foundation-based frames bolstered political attitudes for conservatives (Study 1) and liberals (Study 2). Only Study 2 partially supports the persuasion hypothesis. Conservative-relevant moral frames of liberal issues increased conservatives' liberal attitudes.
© 2014 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; ideology; moral foundations; morality; politics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25286912      PMCID: PMC4858184          DOI: 10.1177/0146167214551152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  19 in total

1.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.

Authors:  Angela Y Lee; Jennifer L Aaker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-02

2.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.".

Authors:  Joseph Cesario; Heidi Grant; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-03

Review 3.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  The end of the end of ideology.

Authors:  John T Jost
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-10

5.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Christina N Benac; Melissa S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates.

Authors:  Marco Perugini; Marcello Gallucci; Giulio Costantini
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05

7.  The moral roots of environmental attitudes.

Authors:  Matthew Feinberg; Robb Willer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-12-10

8.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

9.  Deliver us from evil: the effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush.

Authors:  Mark J Landau; Sheldon Solomon; Jeff Greenberg; Florette Cohen; Tom Pyszczynski; Jamie Arndt; Claude H Miller; Daniel M Ogilvie; Alison Cook
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09

10.  Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians.

Authors:  Ravi Iyer; Spassena Koleva; Jesse Graham; Peter Ditto; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Which Moral Foundations Predict Willingness to Make Lifestyle Changes to Avert Climate Change in the USA?

Authors:  Janis L Dickinson; Poppy McLeod; Robert Bloomfield; Shorna Allred
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Going with the Grain of Cognition: Applying Insights from Psychology to Build Support for Childhood Vaccination.

Authors:  Isabel Rossen; Mark J Hurlstone; Carmen Lawrence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  Moral Foundations and Voting Intention in Italy.

Authors:  Patrizia Milesi
Journal:  Eur J Psychol       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Different Populations Agree on Which Moral Arguments Underlie Which Opinions.

Authors:  Irina Vartanova; Kimmo Eriksson; Isabela Hazin; Pontus Strimling
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-15

6.  Persuading republicans and democrats to comply with mask wearing: An intervention tournament.

Authors:  Michele Gelfand; Ren Li; Eftychia Stamkou; Dylan Pieper; Emmy Denison; Jessica Fernandez; Virginia Choi; Jennifer Chatman; Joshua Jackson; Eugen Dimant
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-04-21

7.  Six minutes to promote change: People, not facts, alter students' perceptions on climate change.

Authors:  Kodiak A Sauer; Daniel K Capps; David F Jackson; Krista A Capps
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Moral Expressions in 280 Characters or Less: An Analysis of Politician Tweets Following the 2016 Brexit Referendum Vote.

Authors:  Livia van Vliet
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  How Americans Respond to Information About Global Warming's Health Impacts: Evidence From a National Survey Experiment.

Authors:  John Kotcher; Edward Maibach; Marybeth Montoro; Susan Joy Hassol
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2018-09-24

10.  Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chan
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2020-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.