Literature DB >> 23228937

The moral roots of environmental attitudes.

Matthew Feinberg1, Robb Willer.   

Abstract

Americans' attitudes about the environment are highly polarized, but it is unclear why this is the case. We conducted five studies to examine this issue. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrated that liberals, but not conservatives, view the environment in moral terms and that this tendency partially explains the relation between political ideology and environmental attitudes. Content analyses of newspaper op-eds (Study 2a) and public-service announcements (Study 2b) found that contemporary environmental discourse is based largely on moral concerns related to harm and care, which are more deeply held by liberals than by conservatives. However, we found that reframing proenvironmental rhetoric in terms of purity, a moral value resonating primarily among conservatives, largely eliminated the difference between liberals' and conservatives' environmental attitudes (Study 3). These results establish the importance of moralization as a cause of polarization on environmental attitudes and suggest that reframing environmental discourse in different moral terms can reduce the gap between liberals and conservatives in environmental concern.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228937     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612449177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  39 in total

1.  Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview.

Authors:  Matthew T Ballew; Matthew H Goldberg; Seth A Rosenthal; Abel Gustafson; Anthony Leiserowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science.

Authors:  Kristian Steensen Nielsen; Theresa M Marteau; Jan M Bauer; Richard B Bradbury; Steven Broad; Gayle Burgess; Mark Burgman; Hilary Byerly; Susan Clayton; Dulce Espelosin; Paul J Ferraro; Brendan Fisher; Emma E Garnett; Julia P G Jones; Mark Otieno; Stephen Polasky; Taylor H Ricketts; Rosie Trevelyan; Sander van der Linden; Diogo Veríssimo; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary (eMFD): Development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text.

Authors:  Frederic R Hopp; Jacob T Fisher; Devin Cornell; Richard Huskey; René Weber
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02

4.  Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.

Authors:  Dena M Gromet; Howard Kunreuther; Richard P Larrick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.

Authors:  Matthew Baldwin; Joris Lammers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.

Authors:  Martin V Day; Susan T Fiske; Emily L Downing; Thomas E Trail
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-10-06

7.  The nature and origins of political polarization over science.

Authors:  Roderik Rekker
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2021-02-17

8.  Multidimensional Model of Environmental Attitudes: Evidence Supporting an Abbreviated Measure in Spanish.

Authors:  Elena Andrade; Gloria Seoane; Luis Velay; Jose-Manuel Sabucedo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Six minutes to promote change: People, not facts, alter students' perceptions on climate change.

Authors:  Kodiak A Sauer; Daniel K Capps; David F Jackson; Krista A Capps
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Moral Expressions in 280 Characters or Less: An Analysis of Politician Tweets Following the 2016 Brexit Referendum Vote.

Authors:  Livia van Vliet
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.