Literature DB >> 26173267

Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates.

Marco Perugini1, Marcello Gallucci2, Giulio Costantini2.   

Abstract

An essential first step in planning a confirmatory or a replication study is to determine the sample size necessary to draw statistically reliable inferences using power analysis. A key problem, however, is that what is available is the sample-size estimate of the effect size, and its use can lead to severely underpowered studies when the effect size is overestimated. As a potential remedy, we introduce safeguard power analysis, which uses the uncertainty in the estimate of the effect size to achieve a better likelihood of correctly identifying the population effect size. Using a lower-bound estimate of the effect size, in turn, allows researchers to calculate a sample size for a replication study that helps protect it from being underpowered. We show that in most common instances, compared with nominal power, safeguard power is higher whereas standard power is lower. We additionally recommend the use of safeguard power analysis to evaluate the strength of the evidence provided by the original study.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords:  power analysis; replicability; safeguard

Year:  2014        PMID: 26173267     DOI: 10.1177/1745691614528519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  20 in total

1.  Making sense of the noise: Replication difficulties of Correll's (2008) modulation of 1/f noise in a racial bias task.

Authors:  Christine Madurski; Etienne P LeBel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor test.

Authors:  Angelika M Stefan; Felix D Schönbrodt; Nathan J Evans; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Power(ful) myths: misconceptions regarding sample size in quality of life research.

Authors:  Samantha F Anderson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.440

4.  Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.

Authors:  Martin V Day; Susan T Fiske; Emily L Downing; Thomas E Trail
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-10-06

6.  When combined spatial polarities activated through spatio-temporal asynchrony lead to better mathematical reasoning for addition.

Authors:  Hélène Verselder; Nicolas Morgado; Sébastien Freddi; Vincent Dru
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

7.  The pervasive avoidance of prospective statistical power: major consequences and practical solutions.

Authors:  Patrizio E Tressoldi; David Giofré
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-28

8.  Researchers' Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research.

Authors:  Marjan Bakker; Chris H J Hartgerink; Jelte M Wicherts; Han L J van der Maas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

9.  The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings.

Authors:  Diego L Lorca-Puls; Andrea Gajardo-Vidal; Jitrachote White; Mohamed L Seghier; Alexander P Leff; David W Green; Jenny T Crinion; Philipp Ludersdorfer; Thomas M H Hope; Howard Bowman; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size.

Authors:  Marjan Bakker; Coosje L S Veldkamp; Olmo R van den Akker; Marcel A L M van Assen; Elise Crompvoets; How Hwee Ong; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.