Literature DB >> 15008644

Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.".

Joseph Cesario1, Heidi Grant, E Tory Higgins.   

Abstract

The authors propose that when a message recipient "feels right" from regulatory fit (E. T. Higgins, 2000), this subjective experience transfers to the persuasion context and serves as information for relevant evaluations, including perceived message persuasiveness and opinions of the topic. Fit was induced either by strategic framing of message arguments in a way that fit/did not fit with the recipient's regulatory state or by a source unrelated to the message itself. Across 4 studies, regulatory fit enhanced perceived persuasiveness and opinion ratings. These effects were eliminated when the correct source of feeling right was made salient before message exposure, supporting the misattribution account. These effects reversed when message-related thoughts were negative, supporting the claim that fit provides information about the "rightness" of one's (positive or negative) evaluations.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15008644     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  58 in total

1.  Regulatory fit effects on perceived fiscal exchange and tax compliance.

Authors:  Susanne Leder; Lucia Mannetti; Erik Hölzl; Erich Kirchler
Journal:  J Socio Econ       Date:  2010-04-01

2.  Affective antecedents of the perceived effectiveness of antidrug advertisements: an analysis of adolescents' momentary and retrospective evaluations.

Authors:  Marco C Yzer; Kathleen D Vohs; Monica Luciana; Bruce N Cuthbert; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-09

3.  A Field Experiment Testing the Utility of Regulatory Fit Messages for Promoting Physical Activity.

Authors:  Amy E Latimer; Susan E Rivers; Tara A Rench; Nicole A Katulak; Althea Hicks; Julie Keany Hodorowski; E Tory Higgins; Peter Salovey
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

4.  The Role of the Self in Responses to Health Communications: A Cultural Perspective.

Authors:  David K Sherman; Ayse K Uskul; John A Updegraff
Journal:  Self Identity       Date:  2011-07

5.  Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Nancy Sohler; Kevin Fiscella; Raquel L Romero; Bennett Parnes; Daniel J Tancredi; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Christina Slee; Simon Dvorak; Charles Turner; Andrew Hudnut; Francisco Prieto; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Developing a scale to assess health regulatory focus.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer L Cerully; Colleen M McBride; James A Shepperd; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Neural correlates of evaluation associated with promotion and prevention regulatory focus.

Authors:  William A Cunningham; Carol L Raye; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Integrating knowledge across domains to advance the science of health behavior: overcoming challenges and facilitating success.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Emily G Grenen; Mary O'Connell; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Kara L Hall; Jennifer M Taber; Amanda L Vogel
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Evaluative Conditioning: The "How" Question.

Authors:  Christopher R Jones; Michael A Olson; Russell H Fazio
Journal:  Adv Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-01-01

10.  Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Karen A Scherr; Paul A Glare; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.