Literature DB >> 25286127

Textures that we like to touch: an experimental study of aesthetic preferences for tactile stimuli.

Roberta Etzi1, Charles Spence2, Alberto Gallace3.   

Abstract

We report two experiments designed to investigate the nature of aesthetic preferences for tactile textures in humans. In Experiment 1, the participants rated their preference for a range of actively and passively explored textures presented on their hands and on their cheeks. The results revealed that those textures that were subjectively-rated as smoother were preferred over those that were rated as rougher. Moreover, certain textures were disliked more during active than during passive stimulation. In Experiment 2, the speed of tactile stimulation was controlled in order to elicit vigorous responses from C-tactile fibers (present only in hairy skin), which are thought to play a central role in pleasant aspects of touch. The results revealed that textures were preferred when presented on the hairy skin of the forearm than on the glabrous palm of the hand. These results provide preliminary evidence regarding people's preferences for different attributes of tactile surface.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic preferences; Haptics; Surface texture; Touch

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25286127     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  10 in total

1.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Defining pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Håkan Olausson; Mats Trulsson; Peter Svensson; Lene Baad-Hansen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-19

Review 3.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  ALE meta-analysis reveals dissociable networks for affective and discriminative aspects of touch.

Authors:  India Morrison
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A Theoretical Framework of Haptic Processing in Automotive User Interfaces and Its Implications on Design and Engineering.

Authors:  Stefan Josef Breitschaft; Stella Clarke; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-26

7.  Individual Differences in Aesthetic Preferences for Multi-Sensorial Stimulation.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Alessandro Soranzo
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-06

8.  Pleasantness Only?

Authors:  Uta Sailer; Marlene Hausmann; Ilona Croy
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2020-07

9.  Crossing boundaries: toward a general model of neuroaesthetics.

Authors:  Manuela M Marin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Active Interpersonal Touch Gives Rise to the Social Softness Illusion.

Authors:  Antje Gentsch; Elena Panagiotopoulou; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.