Literature DB >> 35589909

Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

A K M Rezaul Karim1,2,3, Michael J Proulx4, Alexandra A de Sousa5, Lora T Likova6.   

Abstract

This integrative review rearticulates the notion of human aesthetics by critically appraising the conventional definitions, offerring a new, more comprehensive definition, and identifying the fundamental components associated with it. It intends to advance holistic understanding of the notion by differentiating aesthetic perception from basic perceptual recognition, and by characterizing these concepts from the perspective of information processing in both visual and nonvisual modalities. To this end, we analyze the dissociative nature of information processing in the brain, introducing a novel local-global integrative model that differentiates aesthetic processing from basic perceptual processing. This model builds on the current state of the art in visual aesthetics as well as newer propositions about nonvisual aesthetics. This model comprises two analytic channels: aesthetics-only channel and perception-to-aesthetics channel. The aesthetics-only channel primarily involves restricted local processing for quality or richness (e.g., attractiveness, beauty/prettiness, elegance, sublimeness, catchiness, hedonic value) analysis, whereas the perception-to-aesthetics channel involves global/extended local processing for basic feature analysis, followed by restricted local processing for quality or richness analysis. We contend that aesthetic processing operates independently of basic perceptual processing, but not independently of cognitive processing. We further conjecture that there might be a common faculty, labeled as aesthetic cognition faculty, in the human brain for all sensory aesthetics albeit other parts of the brain can also be activated because of basic sensory processing prior to aesthetic processing, particularly during the operation of the second channel. This generalized model can account not only for simple and pure aesthetic experiences but for partial and complex aesthetic experiences as well.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetics; Affect; Attention; Beauty-dependent; Blindness; Cognition; Crossmodal; Dissociation; Independence; Modality; Neural substrates; Nonvisual; Perception; Task-dependent; Top-down, Bottom-up; Visual

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35589909     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01004-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  219 in total

1.  All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics.

Authors:  M Dorothee Augustin; Johan Wagemans; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-11-26

2.  The neural time course of art perception: an ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art.

Authors:  M Dorothee Augustin; Birgit Defranceschi; Helene K Fuchs; Claus-Christian Carbon; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans.

Authors:  J R Augustine
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1996-10

4.  Neurofunctional correlates of esthetic and moral judgments.

Authors:  Mihai Avram; Evgeny Gutyrchik; Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel; Maximilian Reiser; Janusch Blautzik
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Humans prefer curved visual objects.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

Review 6.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals.

Authors:  S Appelle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: localisation and object recognition with 'the vOICe'.

Authors:  Malika Auvray; Sylvain Hanneton; J Kevin O'Regan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Distinct varieties of aesthetic chills in response to multimedia.

Authors:  Scott Bannister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Playing With Fear: A Field Study in Recreational Horror.

Authors:  Marc Malmdorf Andersen; Uffe Schjoedt; Henry Price; Fernando E Rosas; Coltan Scrivner; Mathias Clasen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.