Qing Liu1, Shannon Waltz1, Grace Woodruff2, Joe Ouyang3, Mason A Israel4, Cheryl Herrera2, Floyd Sarsoza1, Rudolph E Tanzi5, Edward H Koo1, John M Ringman6, Lawrence S B Goldstein2, Steven L Wagner1, Shauna H Yuan1. 1. Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 2. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. 3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla3Capitalbio, San Diego, California. 4. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. Genetics and Aging Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown. 6. Mary S Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research, Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Although considerable effort has been expended developing drug candidates for Alzheimer disease, none have yet succeeded owing to the lack of efficacy or to safety concerns. One potential shortcoming of current approaches to Alzheimer disease drug discovery and development is that they rely primarily on transformed cell lines and animal models that substantially overexpress wild-type or mutant proteins. It is possible that drug development failures thus far are caused in part by the limits of these approaches, which do not accurately reveal how drug candidates will behave in naive human neuronal cells. OBJECTIVE: To analyze purified neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells from patients carrying 3 different presenilin 1 (PS1) mutations and nondemented control individuals in the absence of any overexpression. We tested the efficacy of γ-secretase inhibitor and γ-secretase modulator (GSM) in neurons derived from both normal control and 3 PS1 mutations (A246E, H163R, and M146L). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult human skin biopsies were obtained from volunteers at the Alzheimer Disease Research Center, University of California, San Diego. Cell cultures were treated with γ-secretase inhibitor or GSM. Comparisons of total β-amyloid (Aβ) and Aβ peptides 38, 40, and 42 in the media were made between vehicle- vs drug-treated cultures. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Soluble Aβ levels in the media were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: As predicted, mutant PS1 neurons exhibited an elevated Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio (P < .05) at the basal state as compared with the nondemented control neurons. Treatment with a potent non-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory druglike GSM revealed a new biomarker signature that differs from all previous cell types and animals tested. This new signature was the same in both the mutant and control neurons and consisted of a reduction in Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ38 and in the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio, with no change in the total Aβ levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This biomarker discrepancy is likely due to overexpression of amyloid precursor protein in the transformed cellular models. Our results suggest that biomarker signatures obtained with such models are misleading and that human neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells provide a unique signature that will more accurately reflect drug response in human patients and in cerebrospinal fluid biomarker changes observed during GSM treatment.
IMPORTANCE: Although considerable effort has been expended developing drug candidates for Alzheimer disease, none have yet succeeded owing to the lack of efficacy or to safety concerns. One potential shortcoming of current approaches to Alzheimer disease drug discovery and development is that they rely primarily on transformed cell lines and animal models that substantially overexpress wild-type or mutant proteins. It is possible that drug development failures thus far are caused in part by the limits of these approaches, which do not accurately reveal how drug candidates will behave in naive human neuronal cells. OBJECTIVE: To analyze purified neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells from patients carrying 3 different presenilin 1 (PS1) mutations and nondemented control individuals in the absence of any overexpression. We tested the efficacy of γ-secretase inhibitor and γ-secretase modulator (GSM) in neurons derived from both normal control and 3 PS1 mutations (A246E, H163R, and M146L). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult human skin biopsies were obtained from volunteers at the Alzheimer Disease Research Center, University of California, San Diego. Cell cultures were treated with γ-secretase inhibitor or GSM. Comparisons of total β-amyloid (Aβ) and Aβ peptides 38, 40, and 42 in the media were made between vehicle- vs drug-treated cultures. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Soluble Aβ levels in the media were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: As predicted, mutant PS1 neurons exhibited an elevated Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio (P < .05) at the basal state as compared with the nondemented control neurons. Treatment with a potent non-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory druglike GSM revealed a new biomarker signature that differs from all previous cell types and animals tested. This new signature was the same in both the mutant and control neurons and consisted of a reduction in Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ38 and in the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio, with no change in the total Aβ levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This biomarker discrepancy is likely due to overexpression of amyloid precursor protein in the transformed cellular models. Our results suggest that biomarker signatures obtained with such models are misleading and that human neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells provide a unique signature that will more accurately reflect drug response in humanpatients and in cerebrospinal fluid biomarker changes observed during GSM treatment.
Authors: Elayne M Chan; Sutheera Ratanasirintrawoot; In-Hyun Park; Philip D Manos; Yuin-Han Loh; Hongguang Huo; Justine D Miller; Odelya Hartung; Junsung Rho; Tan A Ince; George Q Daley; Thorsten M Schlaeger Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-10-11 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Maria Z Kounnas; Anne M Danks; Soan Cheng; Curtis Tyree; Elizabeth Ackerman; Xulun Zhang; Kwangwook Ahn; Phuong Nguyen; Dan Comer; Long Mao; Chengzhi Yu; David Pleynet; Paul J Digregorio; Gonul Velicelebi; Kenneth A Stauderman; William T Comer; William C Mobley; Yue-Ming Li; Sangram S Sisodia; Rudolph E Tanzi; Steven L Wagner Journal: Neuron Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Lutgarde Serneels; Jérôme Van Biervliet; Katleen Craessaerts; Tim Dejaegere; Katrien Horré; Tine Van Houtvin; Hermann Esselmann; Sabine Paul; Martin K Schäfer; Oksana Berezovska; Bradley T Hyman; Ben Sprangers; Raf Sciot; Lieve Moons; Mathias Jucker; Zhixiang Yang; Patrick C May; Eric Karran; Jens Wiltfang; Rudi D'Hooge; Bart De Strooper Journal: Science Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Shauna H Yuan; Jody Martin; Jeanne Elia; Jessica Flippin; Rosanto I Paramban; Mike P Hefferan; Jason G Vidal; Yangling Mu; Rhiannon L Killian; Mason A Israel; Nil Emre; Silvia Marsala; Martin Marsala; Fred H Gage; Lawrence S B Goldstein; Christian T Carson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danwei Huangfu; René Maehr; Wenjun Guo; Astrid Eijkelenboom; Melinda Snitow; Alice E Chen; Douglas A Melton Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2008-06-22 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Patrick Reilly; Charisse N Winston; Kelsey R Baron; Margarita Trejo; Edward M Rockenstein; Johnny C Akers; Najla Kfoury; Marc Diamond; Eliezer Masliah; Robert A Rissman; Shauna H Yuan Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Sonia Podvin; Alexander Jones; Qing Liu; Brent Aulston; Charles Mosier; Janneca Ames; Charisse Winston; Christopher B Lietz; Zhenze Jiang; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Tsuneya Ikezu; Robert A Rissman; Shauna H Yuan; Vivian Hook Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2021-05-13