Sonia Podvin1, Alexander Jones2, Qing Liu3, Brent Aulston3, Charles Mosier1, Janneca Ames1, Charisse Winston3, Christopher B Lietz1, Zhenze Jiang1, Anthony J O'Donoghue1, Tsuneya Ikezu4, Robert A Rissman3,5, Shauna H Yuan3, Vivian Hook1,2,3. 1. Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego 92093, California, United States. 2. Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego 92093, California, United States. 3. Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego 92093, California, United States. 4. Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Boston University, School of Medicine, Boston 02118, Massachusetts, United States. 5. Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, San Diego 92161, California, United States.
Abstract
The accumulation and propagation of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-Tau) is a neuropathological hallmark occurring with neurodegeneration of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Extracellular vesicles, exosomes, have been shown to initiate tau propagation in the brain. Notably, exosomes from human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) neurons expressing the AD familial A246E mutant form of presenilin 1 (mPS1) are capable of inducing tau deposits in the mouse brain after in vivo injection. To gain insights into the exosome proteome cargo that participates in propagating tau pathology, this study conducted proteomic analysis of exosomes produced by human iPSC neurons expressing A246E mPS1. Significantly, mPS1 altered the profile of exosome cargo proteins to result in (1) proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes and not in controls, (2) the absence of proteins in the mPS1 exosomes which were present only in controls, and (3) shared proteins which were upregulated or downregulated in the mPS1 exosomes compared to controls. These results show that mPS1 dysregulates the proteome cargo of exosomes to result in the acquisition of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix and protease functions, deletion of proteins involved in RNA and protein translation systems along with proteasome and related functions, combined with the upregulation and downregulation of shared proteins, including the upregulation of amyloid precursor protein. Notably, mPS1 neuron-derived exosomes displayed altered profiles of protein phosphatases and kinases involved in regulating the status of p-tau. The dysregulation of exosome cargo proteins by mPS1 may be associated with the ability of mPS1 neuron-derived exosomes to propagate tau pathology.
The accumulation and propagation of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-Tau) is a neuropathological hallmark occurring with neurodegeneration of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Extracellular vesicles, exosomes, have been shown to initiate tau propagation in the brain. Notably, exosomes from human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) neurons expressing the AD familial A246E mutant form of presenilin 1 (mPS1) are capable of inducing tau deposits in the mouse brain after in vivo injection. To gain insights into the exosome proteome cargo that participates in propagating tau pathology, this study conducted proteomic analysis of exosomes produced by human iPSC neurons expressing A246E mPS1. Significantly, mPS1 altered the profile of exosome cargo proteins to result in (1) proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes and not in controls, (2) the absence of proteins in the mPS1 exosomes which were present only in controls, and (3) shared proteins which were upregulated or downregulated in the mPS1 exosomes compared to controls. These results show that mPS1 dysregulates the proteome cargo of exosomes to result in the acquisition of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix and protease functions, deletion of proteins involved in RNA and protein translation systems along with proteasome and related functions, combined with the upregulation and downregulation of shared proteins, including the upregulation of amyloid precursor protein. Notably, mPS1 neuron-derived exosomes displayed altered profiles of protein phosphatases and kinases involved in regulating the status of p-tau. The dysregulation of exosome cargo proteins by mPS1 may be associated with the ability of mPS1 neuron-derived exosomes to propagate tau pathology.
Alzheimer’s
disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder
resulting in deficits in cognitive function. AD brain neuropathology
displays progressive neuronal loss and severe neurodegeneration, with
the accumulation of amyloid plaque deposits and neurofibrillary tangles
(NFTs). NFTs result from the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau
(p-Tau)[1−5] which lacks the ability to interact with microtubules, leading to
detrimental effects on neuronal synaptic functions. Tau oligomers
impair long-term potentiation and result in memory loss.[6] Tau undergoes cell–cell propagation in
the brain cortex and hippocampus,[7−10] which leads to memory deficits and synaptic
impairment.[11−15]Recent evidence demonstrates that exosomes are involved in
tau
propagation.[16−19] Exosomes are released from neurons, glia, and many cell types and
are characterized as extracellular vesicles of the endosomal origin[20−23] for the removal of cellular components. Exosomes participate in
the transcellular shuttling of exosome cargo molecules consisting
of proteins, RNAs, lipids, and metabolites.[24] Tau is present in exosomes from the cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients.[25] Studies of neuron-derived exosomes (NDEs) isolated
from the plasma of AD patients demonstrate that p-Tau levels in NDE
predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia of AD.[17] Significantly, the intracranial injection of
AD patient-derived plasma NDEs into the mouse brain results in AD-like
tau neuropathology. Furthermore, the inhibition of the exosome synthesis
retards tau propagation in the mouse brain involving microglia.[16] These findings show that exosomes can mediate
transcellular spreading of tau in the brain.Familial AD (FAD)
represents genetic forms of AD and sporadic AD
represents AD patients with no known genetic mutation(s).[26−28] Gene mutations of FAD have provided much insight into molecular
mechanisms of AD. These FAD gene mutations consist primarily of mutations
of presenilin 1 (PS1), which represent most FAD, together with the
mutations of presenilin 2 (PS2) and the amyloid precursor protein
(APP).[29−31] Such FAD mutations result in progressive cognitive
dysfunction and brain neuropathology consistent with AD.To
gain an understanding of the role of a FAD mutant PS1 (mPS1)
in exosome-mediated tau neuropathology, we previously examined the
role of the A246E mPS1[32,33] in regulating exosomal p-Tau
produced by mPS1 patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)
neurons.[34] The mPS1 iPSC neurons displayed
elevated p-Tau and secreted exosomes containing p-Tau. The intracranial
injection of these exosomes into the mouse brain resulted in aggregated
p-Tau in the hippocampus.[34] These results
show that the A246E mPS1 participates in the exosome-mediated transmission
of tau pathology.These findings lead to the important question:
What is the composition
of the protein cargo of mPS1 NDEs? We hypothesized that the A246E
mPS1 mutation may dysregulate the protein cargo of exosomes. To test
this hypothesis, we performed a study to define the proteome
of exosomes produced by patient-derived iPSC neurons with or without
the mPS1 A246E mutation, which is achieved by nano-liquid chromatography
with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS)-based proteomics.Significantly, our results demonstrate that mPS1 dysregulated the
exosome cargo proteins. Global proteomic data were acquired by LC–MS/MS
tandem mass spectrometry with label-free quantification and assessed
for gene ontology (GO), STRING protein networks, brain functions,
and AD mechanisms. Results showed that mPS1 alters the profile of
exosome cargo proteins to result in (1) proteins present only in mPS1
exosomes, and not in controls, (2) the absence of proteins in the
mPS1 exosomes, which were present only in controls, and (3) shared
proteins which were upregulated or downregulated in the mPS1 exosomes
compared to controls. These findings show that the A246E mutation
of PS1 dysregulates the protein cargo of exosomes generated by human
iPSC neurons.
Results
Mutant PS1 Exosomes Induce
Tau Deposits in the Mouse Brain
Deposits of accumulated tau
in the brain is a characteristic of
AD pathology and neurodegeneration. We found that when exosomes produced
from iPSC neurons expressing the mutant A246E presenilin (mPS1) were
injected into the mouse brain, tau pathology resulted which was observed
as deposits of tau in the brain hippocampus (Figure S1). In contrast, control exosomes (from wild-type iPSC neurons)
injected into the mouse brain had no effect.[34]The functional difference of the mPS1 exosomes to induce tau
deposits, compared to control exosomes, led to the purpose of this
study to assess the proteome cargoes of mPS1 exosomes compared to
the control exosomes.
Workflow Strategy to Assess the Protein Cargo
of Exosomes Produced
by mPS1 iPSC Neurons Compared to Controls
The proteomic strategy
for analyses of exosomes generated by mPS1 and control iPSC neurons
is conducted, as shown in Figure , using label-free quantitative mass spectrometry and
bioinformatics tools for data analyses. This study was conducted by
(a) isolation of exosomes from mPS1 iPSC neurons and from control
iPSC neurons, with the confirmation of neuronal markers (Table S1), (b) nano-LC–MS/MS tandem mass
spectrometry of tryptic digests of exosomes, and (c) bioinformatics
to assess biological processes by GO and protein interaction networks
by STRING-db.
Figure 1
Proteomic study design of exosomes generated by mPS1 iPSC
neurons
and by control iPSC neurons. (a) mPS1 human neurons and control wild-type
PS1 human neurons for exosome isolation. The iPSC neurons were derived
(by a reprograming protocol) from a patient with A246E mPS1 and from
a healthy control patient with wild-type PS1, as we have reported
earlier.[19,34−37] It is known that reprograming
of the fibroblast from biopsies into pluripotent stem cells and differentiation
into neurons erases the aging phenotype and generates “age-equivalent”
iPSC neurons.[38,39] The neuronal phenotype of the
iPSC neurons has been confirmed by the presence of multiple neuronal
markers representing synaptic neurotransmission. Exosomes generated
by the neurons were released into media (three biological replicates)
which was collected for exosome isolation. (b) Nano-LC–MS/MS
tandem mass spectrometry of exosomes. Proteins of exosomes were collected
by MeOH precipitation, digested with trypsin/LysC by peptide solid-phase
extraction (SPE),[40] and subjected to nano-LC–MS/MS
tandem mass spectrometry.[41] (c) Bioinformatics
of proteomic data. MS/MS mass spectrometry data were analyzed for
the peptide spectrum matching and protein identification, combined
with quantification, by PEAKS (v. 8.5) software.[42,43] Proteomic data were analyzed for biological systems by GO[44,45] and for protein interaction networks by STRING-db.[46−48]
Proteomic study design of exosomes generated by mPS1 iPSC
neurons
and by control iPSC neurons. (a) mPS1 human neurons and control wild-type
PS1 human neurons for exosome isolation. The iPSC neurons were derived
(by a reprograming protocol) from a patient with A246E mPS1 and from
a healthy control patient with wild-type PS1, as we have reported
earlier.[19,34−37] It is known that reprograming
of the fibroblast from biopsies into pluripotent stem cells and differentiation
into neurons erases the aging phenotype and generates “age-equivalent”
iPSC neurons.[38,39] The neuronal phenotype of the
iPSC neurons has been confirmed by the presence of multiple neuronal
markers representing synaptic neurotransmission. Exosomes generated
by the neurons were released into media (three biological replicates)
which was collected for exosome isolation. (b) Nano-LC–MS/MS
tandem mass spectrometry of exosomes. Proteins of exosomes were collected
by MeOH precipitation, digested with trypsin/LysC by peptide solid-phase
extraction (SPE),[40] and subjected to nano-LC–MS/MS
tandem mass spectrometry.[41] (c) Bioinformatics
of proteomic data. MS/MS mass spectrometry data were analyzed for
the peptide spectrum matching and protein identification, combined
with quantification, by PEAKS (v. 8.5) software.[42,43] Proteomic data were analyzed for biological systems by GO[44,45] and for protein interaction networks by STRING-db.[46−48]
Exosomes Secreted from
mPS1 and Control Human iPSC Neurons
Exosomes isolated from
mPS1 and control iPSC neurons were subjected
to nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) to assess the distribution
of exosome particle sizes (Figure S2).
The mPS1 NDEs had a peak of particles with a diameter of ∼160
nm (∼100–300 nm). The control exosomes had a peak of
particles with a diameter of ∼170 nm (∼100–300
nm). These vesicle diameters fell within the reported ranges of exosome
diameters of approximately 50–150 nm.[49−51] These vesicles
are enriched for exosome components including CD63 and CD81, as shown
in the proteomic data for these exosomes (see Supporting Information Data S1). These markers indicate exosomes
derived from endosomes.[20−23]
Protein Counts for Proteomic Data of mPS1
and Control Exosomes
Nano-LC–MS/MS-based proteomics
identified 1117 total proteins
from exosomes secreted by mPS1 and control iPSC neurons (Figure ). For the mPS1 and
control exosomes, 842 and 1008 proteins were identified, respectively.
Proteins uniquely present in only the mPS1 exosomes numbered 109 and
proteins present in only the control exosomes numbered 275. The mPS1
and control exosomes shared 733 proteins present in both groups.
Figure 2
Protein
identification counts of mPS1 and control exosome proteomic
data. (a) Protein counts. The numbers of proteins identified in mPS1
and control exosomes are shown, including proteins present only in
mPS1 or control exosomes, as well as shared proteins. (b) Venn diagram
of unique and shared proteins of mPS1 and control exosomes. Proteins
present only in mPS1 or control exosomes, or shared in both types
of exosomes are shown.
Protein
identification counts of mPS1 and control exosome proteomic
data. (a) Protein counts. The numbers of proteins identified in mPS1
and control exosomes are shown, including proteins present only in
mPS1 or control exosomes, as well as shared proteins. (b) Venn diagram
of unique and shared proteins of mPS1 and control exosomes. Proteins
present only in mPS1 or control exosomes, or shared in both types
of exosomes are shown.
Proteins Present Only in
mPS1 Exosomes
The mPS1 exosomes
contained 109 unique proteins (Figure , and listed in Supporting Information Data S1), which were absent in the control exosomes. GO analyses[45] revealed a significant enrichment of the mPS1
only proteins in biological pathways of the extracellular matrix (ECM)
and structural organization, cell adhesion, development, and multicellular
processes (Figure ). The mPS1 only proteins were also enriched in the molecular binding
of glycosaminoglycans, ECM, calcium, as well as endopeptidase activity.
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses[52] indicated significant enrichment in protein
homeostasis, ECM receptor interaction, glycosaminoglycan degradation,
as well as protein degradation and processing in the lysosome and
endoplasmic reticulum (ER), respectively. These findings suggest that
proteins present in only mPS1 exosomes participate in ECM binding
and endopeptidase functions, which involve protein processing by lysosomes
and ER.
Figure 3
GO analyses of proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes. GO analyses
of proteins found only in mPS1 exosomes indicate involvement in (a)
biological process pathways, (b) molecular function pathways, and
(c) KEGG pathway. GO enrichment is significant with FDR <1%.
GO analyses of proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes. GO analyses
of proteins found only in mPS1 exosomes indicate involvement in (a)
biological process pathways, (b) molecular function pathways, and
(c) KEGG pathway. GO enrichment is significant with FDR <1%.Protein network analyses of proteins present in
only the mPS1 exosomes
was evaluated by STRING.[46,47] The analysis showed
that 38 out of the 109 mPS1 only proteins are in significant protein
networks as nodes, as illustrated in Figure . The predicted protein interactions include
functions of the extracellular structure and ECM and sulfur binding
(Figure ).
Figure 4
Protein network
analyses of proteins
present only in mPS1 exosomes. STRING-db protein interaction analyses
indicate that 38 proteins (out of the 109 proteins identified only
in mPS1 exosomes) are enriched for known protein–protein interactions.
Interactions utilized scores set to high confidence (0.7) that predicted
links existing among proteins.
Protein network
analyses of proteins
present only in mPS1 exosomes. STRING-db protein interaction analyses
indicate that 38 proteins (out of the 109 proteins identified only
in mPS1 exosomes) are enriched for known protein–protein interactions.
Interactions utilized scores set to high confidence (0.7) that predicted
links existing among proteins.The top network hub proteins with the largest number of interactors
displayed three to seven interactions for each hub (Table ). The interactors for each
hub protein are listed in Supporting Information Data S1. Among these top 11 hub proteins, a large portion represented
collagen genes of COL8A1, COL5A3, COL6A2, COL6A3, and COL14A1, combined
with proteases involved in procollagen processing [PCOLCE and tolloid-like
1 (TLL1)] and collagen fibril assembly [decorin (DCN)]. Collagen proteins
are secreted from cells and deposited into the ECM as structural proteins
and signaling molecules.[53] COL8A1 is a
network-forming collagen involved in vessel wall integrity.[53] COL5A3 is a fibril-forming collagen.[53] COL6A2 is a beaded filament[53] and has been found as a marker in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.[54] COL6A3 is also a beaded filament[53] and has roles in dystonia, alcohol dependence,
and congenital muscular dystrophy[55−57] COL14A1 is a fibril-associated
collagen.[53] The TLL1 metalloendopeptidase
potentiates a procollagen processing protease known as bone morphogenetic
protein.[53,58] The procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer
1 protein (PCOLCE) promotes procollagen C-protease activity that cleaves
type I procollagen C-propeptide.[59] DCN
participates in the collagen fibril assembly and has a stimulatory
effect in autophagy and inflammation.[60,61] Serine protease
23 (PRSS23) is a vascular protease.[62]
Table 1
Hub Proteins of Networks Present Only
in mPS1 Exosomesa
gene name
protein description
# nodes
functions
in the brain, AD, related
COL5A3
collagen type V α-3 chain
6
fibril-forming collagen[53]
COL6A2
collagen type VI α-2 chain
3
beaded filament collagen[53]
marker present in cerebral
amyloid angiopathy[54]
COL6A3
collagen type VI α-3 chain
5
beaded filament collagen[53]
related to dystonia, alcohol
dependence, and congenital muscular dystrophy[55−57]
COL8A1
collagen type VIII α-1 chain
7
network-forming collagen[53]
involved in vessel wall
integrity[53]
COL14A1
collagen type XIV α-1 chain
4
fibril-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices[53]
DCN
decorin
4
role in collagen fibril
assembly[60]
stimulatory effect
in autophagy
and inflammation[61]
TLL1
tolloid-like 1, metalloendopeptidase
4
metalloprotease that cleaves
fibrillar procollagens I, II, III,
V, and VI[58]
role in neurogenesis[58]
PCOLCE
procollagen endopeptidase enhancer 1
4
enhances procollagen C-proteinase activity that cleaves type I procollagen C-propeptide[59]
PRSS23
serine protease 23
4
vascular protease[62]
IGFBP7
insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7
3
attenuates function of ILPs[63]
upregulated in human AD
brain[63]
inhibition of IGFBP7 in
AD mice restores memory impairment and associative learning behavior[63]
biomarker for AD[63]
APOA2
apolipoprotein
A2
3
role in lipid metabolism[64]
associated with lifespan
and cognitive function[64]
Proteins identified only in the
mutant PS1 exosomes are listed by gene name, number of interacting
proteins terms “nodes”, and description of the protein
function. All proteins were identified with FDR less than 1% (see Experimental Procedures).
Proteins identified only in the
mutant PS1 exosomes are listed by gene name, number of interacting
proteins terms “nodes”, and description of the protein
function. All proteins were identified with FDR less than 1% (see Experimental Procedures).Several of the hub proteins have been shown to participate
in AD-related
functions of cognition and learning. IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor-binding
protein 7, a protein that attenuates the function of insulin-like
peptides (ILPs), is upregulated in the brains of AD patients and in
a mouse model of AD (APP/S1-21 mice containing the Thy1 promoter-driven
APP KM670/671NL and Thy1 promoter driven PS1 L166P transgenes);[63] the expression of IGFBP7 in mice results in
impaired memory and significantly, the inhibition of IGFBP7 restores
memory deficits. These findings support a role for IGFBP7 in AD-related
memory loss, involving IGFBP7 attenuation of ILP function. With respect
to APOA2, a protein involved in lipid metabolism, this protein is
associated with cognitive function and lifespan.[64]The mPS1 exosomes also contain ADAMTS1, ADAMTS7,
and ADAMTS12 (Figure ) which are not present
in control exosomes. These three proteins are members of the ADAMTS
protease family of zinc metallopeptidases, which are secreted and
act on ECM components.[65,66] These components have been found
to be associated with AD and related human diseases in genome-wide
association studies (GWAS). Notably, ADAMTS1 has been found to be
associated with the risk for late-onset AD in GWAS evaluations.[67] ADAMTS1 is also linked to degenerative intervertebral
disc disease.[68] ADAMTS12 has been found
to be associated with cerebral vascular aneurysm and pediatric stroke.[69] ADAMTS7 is linked to atherosclerosis and arterial
disease.[67,70,71]Among
other proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes, several are
involved in ECM functions. TGFBI (transforming growth factor-β-induced
protein ig-h3) is an abundant protein based on its quantification
(Figure , and Supporting Information Data S1). TGFBI is a secreted
ECM protein that binds to type I, II, and IV collagens in cell–collagen
interactions.[72−74] Type I and IV collagens are both present in mPS1
and control exosomes (see Supporting Information Data S1).
Figure 5
Abundance of quantifiable proteins present only in mPS1
exosomes.
Quantifiable proteins are assessed for their abundance in the mPS1
exosomes by bar graphs and indicated by intensity areas from mass
spectrometry data (conducted as described in the Experimental Procedures section).
Abundance of quantifiable proteins present only in mPS1
exosomes.
Quantifiable proteins are assessed for their abundance in the mPS1
exosomes by bar graphs and indicated by intensity areas from mass
spectrometry data (conducted as described in the Experimental Procedures section).The EXT2 protein, exostosin-2, is also present in only the mPS1
exosomes (Figure ,
and Supporting Information Data S1). EXT2
is a glycosyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of heparin sulfate
found at cell surfaces and in the ECM, participating in cell–matrix
interactions.[75] Another protein of similar
abundance is POSTN, which is a secreted ECM protein involved in cell
adhesion and tissue regeneration;[76] POSTN
participates in epithelial/mesenchymal interactions which are important
in inflammation through the activation of NF-κB.Overall,
distinct proteins present in only the mPS1 exosomes (and
not in control exosomes) possess ECM functions which include collagen
isoforms and proteases for procollagen processing, ADAMTS zinc metallopeptidases
which act on ECM substrates, and abundant TGFBI, EXT2, and POSTN which
participate in ECM mechanisms. These findings suggest that the mPS1
exosomes uniquely contain protein cargo components involved in the
ECM structure, function, and regulation.
Proteins Present Only in
Control Exosomes and Absent in mPS1
Exosomes
Proteomic analyses of the control exosomes identified
275 unique proteins (Figure , and listed in Supporting Information Data S1), which were absent in the mPS1 exosomes. GO analyses
indicated significant enrichment of the control only proteins in biological
pathways of the cellular component organization and biogenesis in
cellular processes, protein localization, and translational initiation
(Figure ). The control
only proteins were also enriched in the molecular binding functions
for protein, RNA, ribosomes, chromatin, and cell adhesion. Control
only proteins were also enriched in proteasome activity. KEGG analyses
indicated significant enrichment in ribosome, proteasome, and amino
acid biosynthesis pathways. These results suggest that proteins present
in only the control exosomes, and absent in the mPS1 exosomes, function
in cellular protein localization and translational mechanisms, combined
with binding functions of diverse molecules consisting of proteins,
RNA, ribosomes, chromatin, as well as cell adhesion.
Figure 6
GO analyses of proteins
present only in control exosomes. GO analyses
of proteins present only in control exosomes indicate involvement
in (a) biological process pathways, (b) molecular function pathways,
and (c) KEGG pathway. GO enrichment is significant with FDR at <1%.
GO analyses of proteins
present only in control exosomes. GO analyses
of proteins present only in control exosomes indicate involvement
in (a) biological process pathways, (b) molecular function pathways,
and (c) KEGG pathway. GO enrichment is significant with FDR at <1%.Protein network analyses of proteins present in
only the control
exosomes were assessed by STRING for predictions of protein–protein
interaction networks. STRING analyses showed that 141 out of the 275
control only proteins are associated with significant protein networks,
as illustrated in Figure . The top network hub proteins displayed 10 to 26 protein
interactions
for each hub (Table ). The interacting proteins for the top hub proteins are listed in Supporting Information Data S1. The hub proteins
with high numbers of protein interactions (Table ) represent clustered networks of ribosomal
proteins, protein phosphatases, translation initiation factors, RNA
binding proteins for RNA processing and regulation, proteasome functions,
and others (Figure ). The presence of these hubs in only control exosome networks highlights
the absence of these protein functions in the mPS1 exosomes.
Figure 7
Protein network
analyses of proteins present only in control exosomes.
STRING-db network analyses indicate that 141 proteins (out of the
275 proteins present in only control exosomes) were enriched for known
protein–protein interactions. Interactions utilized scores
set to high confidence (0.7) to predict protein networks.
Table 2
Hub Proteins of Networks Present Only
in Control Exosomesa
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 55 kDa regulatory subunit B α
17
dephosphorylation of p-tau[92]
RNA binding and processing
SRSF1
serine/arginine-rich-splicing factor 1
17
participates in binding
to tau pre-mRNA[117]
SRSF7
serine/arginine-rich-splicing factor 7
10
role in regulation of tau
RNA alternative splicing[118]
FUS
RNA-binding protein FUS
15
mutations in FUS are linked
to familial ALS and FTLD[96−99,105,106]
HNRNPU
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U
15
None
PA2G4/EBP1
proliferation-assoc. protein 2G4
14
None
DHX9
ATP-dependent RNA helicase
12
None
NUDT21
cleavage
and polyadenylation
specificity factor subunit 5
12
None
proteasome
PSMC1
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4
12
None
PSMC4
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 68
14
dysregulated in AD and accumulates
in Lewy bodies in PD[122]
PSMD11
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11
13
None
Proteins identified
only in the
control PS1 exosomes are listed by gene name, number of interacting
proteins terms “nodes”, and description of protein function.
All proteins were identified with FDR less than 1% (see Experimental Procedures).
Protein network
analyses of proteins present only in control exosomes.
STRING-db network analyses indicate that 141 proteins (out of the
275 proteins present in only control exosomes) were enriched for known
protein–protein interactions. Interactions utilized scores
set to high confidence (0.7) to predict protein networks.Proteins identified
only in the
control PS1 exosomes are listed by gene name, number of interacting
proteins terms “nodes”, and description of protein function.
All proteins were identified with FDR less than 1% (see Experimental Procedures).Among proteins present in only the control exosomes,
ribosome binding
proteins comprise the largest group of hub proteins each having large
numbers of interacting proteins (11–26 interactions for each
hub). Such hub proteins consist of the 60S ribosomal proteins RPL4,[77] RPL7,[78,79] RPL12,[80] RPL13A[81] RPL18A[82] RPL19,[83] and RPL27A,[84] combined with the 40S ribosomal protein RPS2.[85] This ribosomal cluster of protein hubs (shown
in Figure ) includes
the translation initiation factors EIF2S3, EIF3B, and EIF3J[86−88] as hub proteins (Table ). This cluster of hubs for ribosomal and initiation factors
participates in protein translation. The presence of these ribosomal
proteins in only control exosomes suggests that the mPS1 exosomes
may be compromised in protein translation functions.Of notable
interest is that only the control exosomes contain the
hub protein PPP2R2A, serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A regulatory
subunit B α, a subunit of PP2A (Table ), which is the major tau phosphatase.[89−91] PP2A is a heterotrimeric complex composed of catalytic, regulatory,
and scaffolding subunits.[89,90] The PPP2R2 regulatory
subunit of PP2A targets p-Tau as a substrate for PP2A.[92] Along with PPP2R2A, the control exosomes (not
mPS1 exosomes) contain the three phosphatase catalytic subunits of
PP1α, PP1β, and PP2B (calcineurin) (Supporting Information Data S1). The exclusion of these phosphatase
subunits from the mPS1 exosomes, compared to their presence in the
control exosomes, suggests that the absence of phosphatase components
may promote p-Tau and its neuropathology, as previously observed with
mPS1 exosome injections into the mouse brain.[36]The control exosomes also uniquely contain hub proteins of
networks
for RNA binding and processing proteins (Table ), which are absent in the mPS1 exosomes.
These RNA-modulating hub proteins consist of SRSF1[93] and SRSF7[94] pre-messenger RNA
(mRNA) splicing factors, the HNRNPL[95] component
of ribonucleoprotein complexes of heterogeneous nuclear RNA in the
nucleus, the RNA-binding proteins FUS[96−101] and PA2G (EBP1),[102] the ATP-dependent
RNA helicase DHX9,[103] and the NUDT21[104] factor for 3′-RNA cleavage and polyadenylation.Notably, the FUS RNA binding protein is significantly elevated
in human brains of AD and frontotemporal lobular degeneration (FTLD)
subjects.[96] Mutant forms of FUS are linked
to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and FTLD.[97−99,105,106] The RNA-binding ability
of mutant FUS is necessary for neurodegeneration.[97] Mutant FUS results in the defective RNA metabolism[99,100] and suppresses axonal protein synthesis.[99] FUS is normally present in nuclei[96] but
mutant FUS accumulates in the cytoplasm of ALS and FTLD human brains[97,99−101] and results in an increase of toxicity involving
synaptic dysfunction and behavioral deficits in motor and cognitive
functions.[99−101]The control exosomes contain components
of the proteasome complex
consisting of a cluster of hub proteins consisting of PSMC1, PSMC4,
and PMSD11 regulatory subunits of the 26S proteasome[107−109] (Table ). This cluster
interacts with COPS2, COPS3, and COPS7B[110−112] (Figure ), components
of the COP9 signalosome complex,[113,114] which is
involved in the ubiquitin conjugation pathway through the regulation
of E3 ligase complexes for the regulation of ubiquitin-targeted proteasome
degradation of proteins.[113,115,116]The absence of these protein network hubs in the PS1 exosomes,
compared to their presence in only the control exosomes (Table ), demonstrate that
mPS1 exosomes display alterations in ribosomal proteins, serine/threonine-protein
phosphatase, translation initiation factors, RNA binding proteins,
and proteasome functions. Furthermore, several of the proteins present
only in control exosomes are associated with tau with respect to binding
to tau pre-mRNA by SRSF1,[117] the regulation
of tau RNA alternative splicing by SRSF7,[118] RPL7 formation of aggregates with tau pathology,[119] association of RPL12 with AD transcriptional changes,[120] decreased synthesis of RPL19 in neurons containing
p-Tau,[121] dysregulation of PSMC4 in AD,[122] and de-phosphorylation of tau by PPP2R2A.[92]
Proteins Shared by mPS1 and Control Exosomes:
Upregulation and
Downregulation by mPS1
Proteomic data showed that the shared
proteins present in both the mPS1 and control exosomes consisted of
733 proteins (Figure , and listed in Supporting Information Data S1). GO analyses indicate that mPS1 and control exosomes share proteins
functioning in biological processes of vesicle-mediated transport
and localization, exocytosis and secretion, combined with biogenesis
and organization of cellular components (Figure ). Molecular functions of the shared proteins
consist of binding proteins, anions, carbohydrates, protein complexes,
signaling, GTP, and small molecules (Figure ). KEGG pathway analyses indicate protein
systems for endocytosis, ECM–receptor interaction, actin regulation,
proteasome, and signaling systems.
Figure 8
GO analyses of proteins shared by mPS1
and control exosomes. GO
analyses of proteins identified in mPS1 and control exosomes indicate
involvement in (a) biological process pathways, (b) molecular function
pathways, and (c) KEGG pathway. GO enrichment is significant with
FDR <1%.
GO analyses of proteins shared by mPS1
and control exosomes. GO
analyses of proteins identified in mPS1 and control exosomes indicate
involvement in (a) biological process pathways, (b) molecular function
pathways, and (c) KEGG pathway. GO enrichment is significant with
FDR <1%.The quantitated shared proteins
were assessed for the upregulation
or downregulation in mPS1 compared to control exosomes by heat maps
(Figure ). We also
assessed proteins with log2(mPS1/control) ratios of ≥2,
or ratios ≤−2, in another heat map illustration (Figure S3) that shows the high portion of proteins
that were increased by 4- to 140-fold, or decreased by 75 to 99% in
mPS1 exosomes compared to controls. Clearly, the substantial upregulation
and downregulation of proteins occurred in mPS1 exosomes compared
to control.
Figure 9
Upregulation and downregulation of shared proteins in mPS1 and
control exosomes. Heat map illustration was conducted for the quantifiable
proteins assessed by log2(mPS1/control) values (significance
of p < 0.05). Quantified proteins shared between
mPS1 and control exosomes were evaluated by comparing log2(mPS1/control), shown in heat maps.
Upregulation and downregulation of shared proteins in mPS1 and
control exosomes. Heat map illustration was conducted for the quantifiable
proteins assessed by log2(mPS1/control) values (significance
of p < 0.05). Quantified proteins shared between
mPS1 and control exosomes were evaluated by comparing log2(mPS1/control), shown in heat maps.
Upregulated Proteins
The most highly upregulated proteins
in the mPS1 exosomes compared to controls consisted of HSP90B1, AEBP1,
and ALB. HSP90B1 (GRP94), heat shock protein 90 β family member
1, is a molecular chaperone that functions in the processing and transport
of secreted proteins;[123,124] brain levels of this chaperone
are increased in a mouse model of AD and may participate in Aβ
clearance.[125] AEBP1, AE binding protein,
is a carboxypeptidase-like protein involved in collagen metabolism.[126] ALB, albumin, functions as a carrier protein
for small molecules and for stabilizing extracellular fluid, such
as blood.[127] STRING analyses of upregulated
proteins in mPS1 compared to control exosomes, revealed APP which
yields β-amyloid, as a hub protein interacting with HSP90B1,
ALB, TF (transferrin), A2M (α2-macroglobulin protease inhibitor),
TGFB1 (transforming growth factor β 1), as well as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Figure a).
Figure 10
Network analyses of upregulated and downregulated proteins
in mPS1
compared to control exosomes. (a) Upregulated proteins in mPS1. STRING-db
analyses indicate that 17 proteins (out of the 46 upregulated shared
proteins) were enriched with respect to known protein–protein
interactions. (b) Downregulated proteins in mPS1. STRING-db analyses
show that 17 proteins (out of the 39 downregulated shared proteins)
were enriched with respect to known protein–protein interactions.
Network analyses of upregulated and downregulated proteins
in mPS1
compared to control exosomes. (a) Upregulated proteins in mPS1. STRING-db
analyses indicate that 17 proteins (out of the 46 upregulated shared
proteins) were enriched with respect to known protein–protein
interactions. (b) Downregulated proteins in mPS1. STRING-db analyses
show that 17 proteins (out of the 39 downregulated shared proteins)
were enriched with respect to known protein–protein interactions.Specific functions of the upregulated proteins
and their relationships
to tau and APP/β-amyloid of AD are provided in Table S2.[89,128−243] Biological functions of upregulated proteins consisting of trafficking
and cell morphology (AEBP1, COL11A1, FAT4, GDI1, GPC6, GSN, SPTAN1,
THSD7A, TLN1, TUBB4A, VIM, and WDR1), biochemical and binding (ALB,
DECR1, ENO1, GAPDH, GPC6, MDH1, PHGDH, SHBG, SRI, TF, and UGP2), chaperone
protein folding (CCT4, HSP90B1, PDIA4, and STIP1), proteases and protease
inhibitors (A2M, C1R, PRCP, and THSD7A), synaptic function (CRMP1,
NTPX2, and PLXNB1), development and growth (CCDC80, IGSF8, and TGFBI),
transcriptional and nuclear regulation (DIP2B, SUPT16H, and TNPO1),
cell signaling (ARL3), RNA features (HNRNPK), protein translation
(EIF3B), and immune response (LGALS3BP) are listed in order of the
largest to lowest number of proteins in these categories. Among these
upregulated functions, several proteins are associated with p-Tau
and APP/β-amyloid of AD. PPP2R1A functions as a PP2A tau phosphatase[128,129] and, thus, the upregulation of PPP2R1A may increase p-Tau. The GAPDH
protein has been shown to bind to tau.[130,131] Several proteins
have been suggested as possible biomarkers of p-Tau or aggregated
tau in NFTs which consist of A2M,[132,133] AEBP1,[134] MDH1,[135] and PLXNB.[136] Furthermore, APP and associated proteins with
relationships with APP and β-amyloid were upregulated, consisting
of A2M,[132,133] GAPDH,[130,131] GSN,[137,138] LGALS3BP,[139] PLXNB1,[136] and VIM.[140]
Downregulated
Proteins
The most downregulated proteins
in mPS1 compared to control exosomes consisted of NUMA1 (nuclear mitotic
apparatus protein 1), COL4A2 (collagen type IV α 2 chain), PYGB
(glycogen phosphorylase B), SPON1 (spondin 1), CTNNB1 (catenin β
1), AHSG (α 2-HS glycoprotein), and KIF5B (kinesin family member
5B) (see heat map in Figure ). STRING network analyses of the downregulated proteins illustrated
known interactions of COL1A2 and COL4A2 with PLOD1 (Figure b). Among the downregulated
proteins, several participate in mechanisms of AD; SPON1 interacts
with APOE and APP;[244,245] CTNNB1 interacts with presenilins[246] and participates in apoptosis;[247] and KIF5B kinesin participates in the axonal
transport of APP.[248]Specific functions
of the downregulated proteins are provided in Table S3.[166,249−340] Biological functions of downregulated proteins consist of trafficking
and cell morphology (AHSG, AP2A2, COL1A2, COL4A2, DCN, FAT1, KIF5B,
LLGL1, NID1, NUMA1, SEPT2, and TPM4) biochemical and binding activities
(ALDOA, ANXA5, ASS1, ATP1A2, CKB, CLIC1, LOXL3, PLOD1, PSAP, PYGB,
SLC9A3R1, and SPOCK1), synaptic regulation (CTTNNA2 and SPON1), chaperone
protein folding (HSP90B1 and HSPD1), development and growth (CTTNNA2,
SPON1, and YES1), transcriptional nuclear regulation (PARP1, SSBP1,
and XRCC5), and cell signaling (CTTNNB1, GPC1, and MFGE8).
Exosome
Phosphatases and Kinases Associated with Tau Phosphorylation
Proteomic data from mPS1 and control exosomes were evaluated for
phosphatase and kinase components known to participate in de-phosphorylation
and phosphorylation of tau, respectively.[89,341,342] Several protein phosphatase
components were absent in the mPS1 exosomes and present in only the
control exosomes; these components consist of the phosphatase catalytic
subunits PPP1CA, PPP1CB, and PPP3CA [serine/threonine protein phosphatase
PP1-α catalytic subunit, serine/threonine protein phosphatase
PP1-β catalytic subunit, and phosphatase PP2B catalytic subunit
(calcineurin), respectively][89,341−343] (Table ), combined
with the regulatory phosphatase subunit of PPP2R2A (serine/threonine
protein phosphatase 2A 55 kDa regulatory subunit B α isoform).[89,342−345] In addition, PPP2R1A (serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 65
kDa regulatory subunit A α) is upregulated in mPS1 exosomes
compared to the control (Table ). Roles for these phosphatase components for de-phosphorylation
of tau have been reported.[89,342−345] The absence of numerous protein phosphatase components may be consistent
with facilitation of p-Tau formation by mPS1 exosomes.[36]
Table 3
Tau Phosphatases
and Kinases in mPS1
and Control Exosomes
mPS1 or
control exosomes
gene name
description
only mPS1
only control
shared, log2 of mPS1/control
role in tau
phosphorylation
references
Phosphatases
PPP1CA
serine/threonine protein phosphatase PP1-α catalytic
subunit
+
PP1 α catalytic subunit contributes
to de-phosphorylation of tau
(89,342,343)
PPP1CB
serine/threonine protein phosphatase PP1-β catalytic
subunit
+
PP1 β catalytic subunit contributes
to de-phosphorylation of tau
calcineurin de-phosphorylates pS262 and pS396 on tau, which are
both found in parahelical filaments
(89,342,343)
PPP2R2A
serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A 55 kDa regulatory subunit B α
+
B55α regulatory subunit
of PP2A recognizes p-tau substrate
for PP2A de-phosphorylation
(89,92,342,345)
PPP2R1A
serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 65 kDa regulatory subunit A α
+, 1.670
this subunit of PP2A is
required for tau (and other substrate) de-phosphorylation
(89,92,342,345)
Kinases
PRKDC
DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit
+
DNA-PK catalytic subunit phosphorylates tau in vitro
(347)
CSNK2B
casein kinase II subunit β
+
CK2 phosphorylates
SET to
induce PP2A inhibition resulting in hyper-phosphorylation of tau; CK2 is overactive in AD
(349)
CDK1
cyclin-dependent kinase 1
+
CDK has high affinity for
phosphorylation of SP motifs of tau; CDK1 also inhibits PP2A via SET
(346, 348)
FYN
tyrosine protein kinase
Fyn
+, 0.131
Fyn phosphorylates tau and
also inhibits the main tau phosphatase PP2A by phosphorylation
(341,350,351)
MAPK3 (ERK1)
mitogen-activated protein kinase 3
+, −0.156
Erk1 is involved in abnormal
tau phosphorylation at sites identified in AD brains
(341,352)
MAPK1 (ERK2)
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1
+, −0.768
Erk2 can phosphorylate tau
at 15 sites in vitro and its increased activity can contribute to tauopathy
(341,352,353)
SRC
proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src
+, na
Src phosphorylates
tau present
in NFTs
(350)
Several protein kinases with roles
in the phosphorylation of tau
were identified in only control exosomes, consisting of PRKDC, CSKN2,
and CDK1 (DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, casein kinase
II subunit β, and cyclin-dependent kinase 1, respectively)[341,346−349] (Table ). Among
the proteins present in both mPS1 and control exosomes, FYN was moderately
upregulated in mPS1 compared to control exosomes (Table ). FYN has dual functions for
the direct phosphorylation of tau and also phosphorylation of PP2A,
which inhibits the PP2A-mediated de-phosphorylation of p-Tau.[341,350,351] The MAPK3 and MAPK1 (Erk1 and
Erk2 protein kinases involved in tau phosphorylation)[341,352,353] are moderately downregulated
in mPS1 compared to control exosomes (Table ). The SRC kinase (proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein
kinase Src) was present in both mPS1 and control exosomes; SRC participates
in the phosphorylation of tau.[350] These
findings suggest that the balance of several kinases is modified in
the mPS1 exosomes compared to the control exosomes.
Discussion
The exosome cargo produced by patient-derived iPSC neurons with
the presenilin mutation A246E (mPS1) was investigated by proteomics
and protein network analyses and compared to exosomes generated by
normal human iPSC neurons derived from a nondemented control patient.
These studies were designed to gain insights into the protein cargo
of mPS1 exosomes which induce the propagation of tau pathology in
the mouse brain.[34] Significantly, findings
showed that mPS1 alters the profile of exosome cargo proteins to result
in (1) proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes and not in controls,
(2) the absence of proteins in the mPS1 exosomes which were present
only in controls, and (3) shared proteins which were upregulated or
downregulated in the mPS1 exosomes compared to controls (Figure ). These data show
that mPS1 dysregulates the proteome cargo of exosomes which result
in the acquisition of proteins involved in ECM functions, deletion
of proteins involved in RNA, and protein translation systems along
with protease and related functions, combined with the upregulation
and downregulation of shared proteins (Figure ). Notably, mPS1 exosomes display dysregulation
of protein phosphatases and kinases known to be involved in regulating
the phosphorylation status of tau. The altered profile of exosome
cargo proteins by mPS1 may be associated with the ability of the mPS1
exosomes to propagate p-Tau neuropathology in the mouse brain.[34]
Figure 11
Mutant PS1 dysregulates exosome cargo through the acquisition
and
loss of proteins, combined with the upregulation and downregulation
of proteins shared with control exosomes. The A246E mPS1 dysregulates
the proteome cargo of exosomes generated by patient-derived iPSC neurons.
Proteomic data demonstrated that mPS1 exosomes contain (1) proteins
present only in mPS1 exosomes (pink circles) and not in controls,
which included ECM collagen, proteases, and related components, (2)
loss of proteins in the mPS1 exosomes (gray circles) which were present
only in controls (gray circles), consisting of phosphatases, ribosomal,
and protein translation proteins, RNA binding and processing proteins,
proteasomes, and related, and (3) shared proteins (blue circles) for
exocytotic, secretory, and related functions, many of which were upregulated
or downregulated in the mPS1 exosomes compared to controls. The mPS1
exosomes induce tau pathology in the mouse brain after the in vivo injection,[34] but the
control exosomes have no effect.
Mutant PS1 dysregulates exosome cargo through the acquisition
and
loss of proteins, combined with the upregulation and downregulation
of proteins shared with control exosomes. The A246E mPS1 dysregulates
the proteome cargo of exosomes generated by patient-derived iPSC neurons.
Proteomic data demonstrated that mPS1 exosomes contain (1) proteins
present only in mPS1 exosomes (pink circles) and not in controls,
which included ECM collagen, proteases, and related components, (2)
loss of proteins in the mPS1 exosomes (gray circles) which were present
only in controls (gray circles), consisting of phosphatases, ribosomal,
and protein translation proteins, RNA binding and processing proteins,
proteasomes, and related, and (3) shared proteins (blue circles) for
exocytotic, secretory, and related functions, many of which were upregulated
or downregulated in the mPS1 exosomes compared to controls. The mPS1
exosomes induce tau pathology in the mouse brain after the in vivo injection,[34] but the
control exosomes have no effect.Tau undergoes phosphorylation and de-phosphorylation by protein
kinases and phosphatases, respectively, to regulate the amount of
p-Tau in AD and healthy brains. Hyperphosphorylation of tau occurs
in AD and results in disrupted microtubule stability and deficits
in axonal and synaptic functions.[354,355] Because the
mPS1 exosomes result in the propagation of p-Tau in the mouse brain,[34] evaluation of mPS1 exosomes for regulators of
phosphorylation was conducted. The most notable finding was that only
the mPS1 exosomes lacked many phosphatase components known to participate
in the de-phosphorylation of p-Tau that were present in control exosomes.
The PPP2R2A regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A was exclusively
found in the control exosomes and not in mPS1 exosomes. PPP2R2A is
a regulatory subunit that specifically targets p-Tau as the substrate
for de-phosphorylation. The regulatory subunit with the catalytic
and scaffolding subunits comprise the heterotrimeric phosphatase complex.
There are numerous regulatory subunits for substrate recognition;
therefore, it is significant that the tau-targeting subunit was present
in only the control exosomes. In addition, the phosphatase catalytic
subunits PPP1CA, PPP1CB, and PPP3CA were also exclusively found in
the control exosomes and not in mPS1. The distinct loss of PPP2R2A
by mPS1 exosomes for targeting tau as the substrate, combined with
the loss of several catalytic subunits of protein phosphatases, may
facilitate p-Tau involved in AD pathology.With respect to protein
kinases known to participate in phosphorylation
of tau,[89] the PRKDC, CSKN2, and CDK1 kinases
were identified in only the control exosomes and not the mPS1 exosomes.
The tyrosine kinase FYN was moderately upregulated in mPS1 exosomes
compared to controls; FYN has dual functions which include direct
phosphorylation of tau and inhibiting PP2A the de-phosphorylation
of p-Tau.[341,350,351] The MAPK3 and MAPK1 kinases were moderately downregulated in the
mPS1 exosomes compared to controls. These findings suggest the dysregulation
of the balance of several tau protein kinases in the mPS1 compared
to control exosomes.The mPS1 exosomes acquire distinct proteins
which were absent in
the control exosomes. Unique proteins present in only the mPS1 exosomes
possess ECM functions consisting of collagen isoforms (collagen types
V, VI, VIII, and XIV) and proteases (DCN protease and TLL1 metalloendopeptidase)
for procollagen processing, ADAMTS zinc metallopeptidases which act
on ECM substrates, and abundant TGFBI, EXT2, and POSTN which participate
in ECM mechanisms. These findings suggest that the mPS1 exosomes uniquely
contain protein cargo components involved in the ECM structure and
function. Such ECM functions may participate in mPS1 exosome-mediated
propagation of tau pathology in the brain.Losses of proteins
in mPS1 exosomes were observed because such
proteins were present only in control exosomes. The control exosomes
contain clusters of protein networks which function in ribosomal and
initiation factors in protein translation systems, RNA binding and
RNA processing systems, and proteasome components for protein degradation.
The absence of these functional systems in the mPS1 exosomes suggests
their lack of biosynthetic capacity for RNA processing and protein
translation. Furthermore, the lack of proteasome components in the
mPS1 exosomes could possibly contribute to the accumulation of misfolded
proteins in tau pathology via the proteasome regulation
of the misfolded protein response. Clearly, the mPS1 exosomes lack
protein components integral to RNA-based protein translation combined
with protein homeostasis. These findings demonstrate that mPS1 redirected
the routing of approximately one-fourth of the normal exosomal proteins
in a manner such that it prevents packaging into the mPS1 exosomes.With respect to proteins that were absent in mPS1 exosomes compared
to control exosomes, or absent in control exosomes compared to mPS1
exosomes, it is realized that such data are dependent on the mass
spectrometry detection limits and dynamic range for data acquisition.
Therefore, the “absence” of proteins is based on the
mass spectrometry method. It is possible that proteins may be present
at levels below the quantitative detection limit of the mass spectrometry
method.The proteomic data also show that a large portion of
mPS1 and control
exosome cargoes are common to both exosome types. These shared proteins
represent fundamental exosome activities consisting of vesicle-mediated
transport, exocytosis, and secretion processes, which involve molecular
protein binding functions and enzymes. Among the shared proteins,
mPS1 exosomes displayed a significant upregulation and downregulation
of protein components (Figure ). It is of interest that the APP was upregulated in
mPS1 exosomes. APP serves as substrate of PS1, which is the aspartyl
protease subunit of the γ-secretase complex which catalyzes
processing of APP to generate Aβ peptides.[222] Thus, mPS1 elevates its APP substrate in exosomes. It will
be of interest in future studies to examine whether mPS1 exosomes
induce Aβ neuropathology combined with the propagation of tau
pathology in the brain.Along with APP, the mPS1 exosomes (compared
to control exosomes)
also display the strong upregulation of HSP90B1, AEBP1, and ALB proteins.
Brain levels of the HSP90B1 chaperone are increased in a mouse model
of AD and may participate in Aβ clearance.[243] The strong downregulation of proteins also occurs in the
mPS1 exosomes (compared to controls) which consist of NUMA1 (nuclear
mitotic apparatus protein 1), COL4A2 (collagen type IV α 2 chain),
PYGB (glycogen phosphorylase B), SPON1 (spondin 1), CTNNB1 (catenin
β 1), AHSG (α 2-HS glycoprotein), and KIF5B (kinesin family
member 5B). Among these downregulated proteins, several participate
in AD, consisting of SPON1 interaction with APOE and APP,[244,245] CTNNB1 interacts with presenilins[246] and
participates in apoptosis,[247] and KIF5B
participates in the axonal transport of APP.[264,265]The A246E mPS1 is one of the numerous mutations reported for PSEN1 in AD.[32,33,356,357] The results of this study demonstrating
the mPS1 dysregulation of exosome proteins lead to the question of
whether other PSEN1 mutations of AD might dysregulate
exosome cargo molecules. PSEN1 mutations are the
most common cause of early onset FAD. Mutant presenilins comprise
the majority of the 150 presenilin mutations, which include about
a dozen mutations of the homologous PS2 (PSEN2).
It will be of interest to gain further insights into possible relationships
of numerous presenilin mutations and exosome cargoes for the propagation
of tau and related pathology in AD.
Experimental Procedures
Experimental
Design
The workflow for proteomic analyses
of exosomes isolated from human iPSC neurons expressing the A246E
mPS1 or from control human iPSC neurons is shown in Figure . Human iPSC neurons were derived
from the respective patient or healthy control tissue biopsies.[34,35] Each mPS1 and control group consisted of three biological replicates
of neuronal cultures (n = 3) which allowed statistical
evaluations (by Student’s t-test, significance
of p < 0.05). Exosomes were isolated from the
media of neuronal cell cultures of the mPS1 and control groups using ExoQuick-TC (System Biosciences,
Palo Alto, CA) (Figure a). Exosome proteins were digested with trypsin/LysC and subjected
to nano-LC–MS/MS tandem mass spectrometry analysis on a Dionex
UltiMate 3000 nano LC and an Orbitrap Q-Exactive mass spectrometer
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) (Figure b). Samples were injected twice (in randomized
order) into the nano-LC–MS/MS system for global proteomic analyses.
Bioinformatic analyses of MS1 and MS2 data
for peptide and protein identification and label-free quantitation
(LFQ) used PEAKS Studio 8.5 (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc., Waterloo
ON, Canada). PEAKS searched the human protein sequence database (UniprotKB/SwissProt
2018_2 with 71,783 entries) for peptide spectrum matches and protein
identification with LFQ (Figure c).The criteria for the inclusion of an identified
or quantifiable protein in a biological replicate sample required
that the protein was identified in at least one of the two technical
replicates per biological sample. The criteria for the inclusion of
an identified or quantifiable protein in either the mPS1 or control
groups required that the protein was identified in at least two out
of the three biological replicates per group. Quantifiable data of
the mPS1 and control groups were compared by Student’s t-test.
Human iPSC Neuronal Cultures: mPS1 and Control
Human
iPSC neuronal cells were prepared from a control patient biopsy (non-demented)
and from a patient possessing the A246E mutation in the PSEN1 gene, using our published protocol.[19,34,35] The control iPSC neurons were derived from a biopsy
of a non-demented male subject aged 86 years[36] and the mPS1 neurons were derived from a biopsy of a male subject,
age d56 years, harboring the A246E mPS1 with AD onset at about 50
years;[37] all subject data have been deidentified.
It is known that reprograming of the fibroblast from biopsies into
pluripotent stem cells and differentiation into neurons erases the
aging phenotype and generates “age-equivalent” iPSC
neurons.[38,39] Therefore, the mPS1 and control iPSC neurons
prepared for this study are “age-equivalent.”For the culture of iPSC neurons, neural stem cells plated at a density
of 1.5 × 105 cells/cm2 on Matrigel-coated
(70 μg/mL, BD Bioscience) dishes and were grown to ∼80%
confluence. Neuronal differentiation was initiated by the removal
of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, Biopioneer) from the media
(DMEM–F-12, 1% N-2, 2% B-27, Pen–Strep, 20 ng/mL bFGF).
Differentiation into neurons was indicated by neuronal markers of
synaptic neurotransmission (shown in Table S1). Conditioned culture media was collected from cells at 3–4
day intervals. Cell viability in cultures was typically greater than
90–95% viable.
Exosome Isolation and NTA
The isolation
of exosomes
from cell culture medium used ExoQuick-TC (System Biosciences, Inc.)
according to the provided protocol. The medium was incubated with
ExoQuick-TC with rotation overnight at 4 °C, then centrifuged
at 1500g for 30 min at 4 °C. The pellet was
placed in phosphate-buffered saline with EDTA-free protease and a
phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and stored at −70 °C. Protein
levels of exosome preparations were measured using the bicinchoninic
acid protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology). Exosomes (10 μg)
were evaluated for the size distribution and concentration by NTA
with a NanoSight LM10 instrument.
Trypsin/LysC Digestion
and LC–MS/MS
Proteins
of exosome samples (100 μg each) were precipitated in 90% ice-cold
methanol on ice for 15 min, and then centrifuged for 30 min at 14,000g (4 °C). The resulting protein pellet was dried in
a vacuum centrifuge, resuspended in urea buffer (8 M urea, 50 mM Tris–HCl,
pH 8), and sonicated. For reduction, dithiothreitol (DTT, 100
mM stock) was added to obtain 5 mM DTT and samples were incubated
at 55 °C for 45 min, and cooled at room temperature (RT) for
5 min. For cysteine alkylation, iodoacetamide (IAA, 200 mM stock in
50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8) was added to obtain 15 mM IAA, incubated
in the dark at RT for 30 min, and quenched by the addition of DTT
to 5 μM. To lower the urea to less than 1 M, samples were diluted
with 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8. Trypsin/LysC (Promega) was added
to each sample at a ratio of 50:1 protein/trypsin (w/w) and incubated
at RT for 18–24 h, and quenched by the addition of trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) to less than 0.5%. Samples were stored at −70 °C.Tryptic peptides were purified and desalted on C18 stage tip SPE
using Empore C18 wafers (3M), as reported in the field.[40] The stage tip was washed with acetonitrile (ACN)
and equilibrated with 0.1% TFA. Samples were loaded, washed with 0.1%
TFA, eluted with 50% ACN/0.1% TFA, dried in a vacuum centrifuge, resuspended
in water and sonicated, and peptide levels were determined by the
total peptide assay kit (Thermo Fisher). Samples were dried in a SpeedVac
and stored at −70 °C.
LC–MS/MS Tandem
Mass Spectrometry
LC–MS/MS
was performed on a Dionex UltiMate 3000 nano-LC and an Orbitrap Q-Exactive
mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptide samples were
re-suspended in 2% ACN, 0.1% TFA to 0.6 μg/μL peptide
concentration. Each sample was injected twice (2.5 μg per injection)
onto the nanoLC column (75 μm inner diameter, 360 μm outer
diameter, and 25 cm length) packed with the BEH C18 (1.7 μm
diameter) solid-phase material and heated to 65 °C with a column
heater.[41] LC used a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min
using a 120 min linear gradient of 5 to 25% ACN/0.1% formic acid,
followed by a 5 min linear gradient of 25 to 95% ACN/0.1% formic acid.
MS and MS/MS spectra were obtained in positive ion data-dependent
mode. MS1 was acquired in the profile mode with a 3 × 106 automatic
gain control target, 100 ms maximum injection time, a 310–1250 m/z window, and 70,000 resolution (at m/z 200). MS2 was acquired in the centroid
mode with 1 × 105 AGC target, 50 ms maximum time for
injection, 2 × 103 minimum precursor intensity, 35
s per 10 ppm dynamic exclusion, 17,500 resolution (at m/z 200), a first mass of m/z 150, and HCD collision energy of 28. A LC–MS/MS
report is provided
in Supporting Information S1. LC–MS/MS
files are available at www.proteomexchange.org with the
dataset identifier PXD019424, or at www.massive.ucsd.edu with dataset identifier MSV000085478 or ID = 229a900a721d40ada5e6fc806241ba2b.
Protein Identification
MS and MS/MS data files were
queried by PEAKS (v. 8.5) bioinformatic software[42] for peptide identification and label-free quantitation
(LFQ) analyses (next section). The data files were searched against
the UniprotKB/SwissProt human protein sequence database (release 2018_02)
having 71,783 entries. Peptide identifications included searching
of a decoy-fusion spectrum library of human proteins, generated by
PEAKS v. 8.5 from the human protein database of UniprotKB/SwissProt.
PEAKS parameters for protein and peptide identification consisted
of trypsin (cleavages at Arg and Lys, and two missed or nonspecific
cleavages allowed), carbomidomethylation on Cys, oxidation of Met,
pGlu, and N-terminal acetylation, and phosphorylation were included
in the search parameters. Precursor mass error tolerance was 25 ppm,
mass tolerance for the fragment ion was 0.01 Da, and threshold peptide
scores of −log10P ≥ 32.
The threshold score was <1% FDR (false discovery rate), equivalent
to −log10P > 20. The report
of
the PEAKS analyses is in Supporting Information S2. The threshold score for protein identification was −log10P ≥ 55, equivalent to 1% FDR. The Supporting Information provides assigned peptide
sequences and protein identifications (Supporting Information Data S1). Supporting Information Data S1 (master table of data) summarizes the identified and
quantified proteins in mPS1 and control exosomes. Single peptides
passing the criteria for protein identification are provided with
MS/MS spectra in Supporting Information S3.
Protein Quantification
Label-free quantitation (LFQ)
of proteins was assessed by PEAKS (v. 8.5) (Supporting Information Data S1). Extracted ion chromatographs of MS2 peaks
were converted to the area under the curve, and the peak areas of
MS2 of each peptide spectrum were summed to determine protein relative
abundances. Spectra were filtered for quality parameters prior to
LFQ, consisting of peptide quality of >0.3, abundance of 1 ×
104, and present in 25% or more of technical replicates.
Replicates were compared for retention time and isotope pattern for
inclusion in quantitation analysis. The normalization of technical
variations used the LOESS-G application.[43]Analytical replicate reliability was restricted by −log10P and quality assessed as 1/log(σ),
where σ is the variance between technical runs; −log10P > 20 represents 1% FDR. The imputation
of the quantitative area with a value of 0 was achieved with a value
representing the lower 5% of values within standard deviation (SD)
of |1|. Multiple isoforms within a protein group were inspected to
assure that the isoforms were assigned the same quantitation data.
Biological replicate values for protein quantifications of mPS1 and
control groups were averaged and SD computed, using Student’s t-test to assess the significance (p <
0.05) of mPS1 compared to the control for significantly regulated
proteins.The PEAKS bioinformatic data analyses are provided
in the master
table of data (Supporting Information Data S1), which identifies the proteins present only in mPS1 exosomes, only
in control exosomes, and proteins shared by the two groups. The Supporting Information Data S1 master table contains
the lists of identified proteins, quantifiable proteins with their
summed peak area values, and details of protein properties including
% coverage and number of peptides per protein group.
GO and STRING-db
Network Analyses
Identified and quantified
proteins in experimental groups were evaluated for GO systems and
protein–protein interactions using STRING-db (https://string-db.org/).GO analyses indicated the significant enrichment of exosome protein
groups to GO terms with FDR <1% using Benjamini–Hochberg.[44,45] FDR was assessed by hypergeometric testing, a probability distribution
that assesses the significance of having hits within experimental
gene sets compared to total genes in the GO pathway.Protein
networks were assessed by STRING (version 11.0)[46] (www.string-db.org). STRING utilizes a database of protein interactions data sets (DIP,
BioGRID, HPRD, IntAct, MINT, and PDB). Significant protein–protein
network enrichment was assessed by a probability p-value to indicate whether an experimental group of proteins have
more interactions compared to interactions expected from a randomly
selected protein group of the same size at a high confidence score
of 0.7.[47]
Heat Maps of Significantly
Upregulated and Downregulated Proteins
in mPS1 and Control Exosomes
Quantifiable proteins shared
by the mPS1 and control groups were analyzed by log2(mPS1/control)
ratios and shown in heat maps for significant differences between
mPS1 and control (p < 0.05). Power analysis of
quantitative data were conducted using the pwr.2p.test function of
the pwr package in R, with n = 3, significance set
to 0.05 (p < 0.05), and power of 0.8 or greater.
Heat maps were generated with the heat map function in R studio (https://www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio/).[48]
Data Availability
LC–MS/MS files are available at www.proteomexchange.org for identifier number PXD019424, or at www.massive.ucsd.edu under
the identifier number MSV000085478 or ID = 229a900a721d40ada5e6fc806241ba2b.
Authors: Justin R Welden; Jacob van Doorn; Peter T Nelson; Stefan Stamm Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 5.187
Authors: G A Calin; M G di Iasio; E Caprini; I Vorechovsky; P G Natali; G Sozzi; C M Croce; G Barbanti-Brodano; G Russo; M Negrini Journal: Oncogene Date: 2000-02-24 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Zeshan Ahmed; Jane Cooper; Tracey K Murray; Katya Garn; Emily McNaughton; Hannah Clarke; Samira Parhizkar; Mark A Ward; Annalisa Cavallini; Samuel Jackson; Suchira Bose; Florence Clavaguera; Markus Tolnay; Isabelle Lavenir; Michel Goedert; Michael L Hutton; Michael J O'Neill Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2014-02-16 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Mariana Pavel; Sara Imarisio; Fiona M Menzies; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Farah H Siddiqi; Xiaoting Wu; Maurizio Renna; Cahir J O'Kane; Damian C Crowther; David C Rubinsztein Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Heba A Alkhatabi; Donal P McLornan; Austin G Kulasekararaj; Farooq Malik; Thomas Seidl; David Darling; Joop Gaken; Ghulam J Mufti Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-07-26
Authors: Elena Perenthaler; Anita Nikoncuk; Soheil Yousefi; Woutje M Berdowski; Maysoon Alsagob; Ivan Capo; Herma C van der Linde; Paul van den Berg; Edwin H Jacobs; Darija Putar; Mehrnaz Ghazvini; Eleonora Aronica; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Walter G de Valk; Evita Medici-van den Herik; Marjon van Slegtenhorst; Lauren Brick; Mariya Kozenko; Jennefer N Kohler; Jonathan A Bernstein; Kristin G Monaghan; Amber Begtrup; Rebecca Torene; Amna Al Futaisi; Fathiya Al Murshedi; Renjith Mani; Faisal Al Azri; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Majid Mojarrad; Atieh Eslahi; Zaynab Khazaei; Fateme Massinaei Darmiyan; Mohammad Doosti; Ehsan Ghayoor Karimiani; Jana Vandrovcova; Faisal Zafar; Nuzhat Rana; Krishna K Kandaswamy; Jozef Hertecant; Peter Bauer; Mohammed A AlMuhaizea; Mustafa A Salih; Mazhor Aldosary; Rawan Almass; Laila Al-Quait; Wafa Qubbaj; Serdar Coskun; Khaled O Alahmadi; Muddathir H A Hamad; Salem Alwadaee; Khalid Awartani; Anas M Dababo; Futwan Almohanna; Dilek Colak; Mohammadreza Dehghani; Mohammad Yahya Vahidi Mehrjardi; Murat Gunel; A Gulhan Ercan-Sencicek; Gouri Rao Passi; Huma Arshad Cheema; Stephanie Efthymiou; Henry Houlden; Aida M Bertoli-Avella; Alice S Brooks; Kyle Retterer; Reza Maroofian; Namik Kaya; Tjakko J van Ham; Tahsin Stefan Barakat Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 17.088