Literature DB >> 25939456

Multitasking: Effects of processing multiple auditory feature patterns.

Tova Miller1, Sufen Chen1, Wei Wei Lee1, Elyse S Sussman1.   

Abstract

ERPs and behavioral responses were measured to assess how task-irrelevant sounds interact with task processing demands and affect the ability to monitor and track multiple sound events. Participants listened to four-tone sequential frequency patterns, and responded to frequency pattern deviants (reversals of the pattern). Irrelevant tone feature patterns (duration and intensity) and respective pattern deviants were presented together with frequency patterns and frequency pattern deviants in separate conditions. Responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature pattern deviants were used to test processing demands for irrelevant sound input. Behavioral performance was significantly better when there were no distracting feature patterns. Errors primarily occurred in response to the to-be-ignored feature pattern deviants. Task-irrelevant elicitation of ERP components was consistent with the error analysis, indicating a level of processing for the irrelevant features. Task-relevant elicitation of ERP components was consistent with behavioral performance, demonstrating a "cost" of performance when there were two feature patterns presented simultaneously. These results provide evidence that the brain tracked the irrelevant duration and intensity feature patterns, affecting behavioral performance. Overall, our results demonstrate that irrelevant informational streams are processed at a cost, which may be considered a type of multitasking that is an ongoing, automatic processing of task-irrelevant sensory events.
© 2015 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory processes; Cognition; EEG; Normal volunteers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939456      PMCID: PMC4946337          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  22 in total

1.  An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  E Sussman; W Ritter; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  R Näätänen; M Tervaniemi; E Sussman; P Paavilainen; I Winkler
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Integration and segregation in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; Dennis J Crouch
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system.

Authors:  E Sussman; W Ritter; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components.

Authors:  K C Squires; E Donchin; R I Herning; G McCarthy
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-01

8.  NMDA application potentiates synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.

Authors:  J A Kauer; R C Malenka; R A Nicoll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The P300 wave of the human event-related potential.

Authors:  T W Picton
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nikos Konstantinou; Eleanor Beal; Jean-Remi King; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Renee M Symonds; Juin W Zhou; Sally L Cole; Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  A Model for Statistical Regularity Extraction from Dynamic Sounds.

Authors:  Benjamin Skerritt-Davis; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Acta Acust United Acust       Date:  2018-12-07

3.  The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.