Literature DB >> 34110020

The role of attention and explicit knowledge in perceiving bistable auditory input.

Kelin M Brace1, Elyse S Sussman1,2.   

Abstract

The auditory system frequently encounters ambiguous sound input that can be perceived in multiple ways. The current study investigated the role of explicit knowledge in modulating how sounds are represented in auditory memory for a bistable sound sequence that could be perceived equally as integrated or segregated. We hypothesized that the dominant percept of the bistable sequence would suppress representation of the alternative perceptual organization as a function of how much top-down knowledge the listener had about the structure of the sequence. Performance measures and event-related brain potentials were compared when participants had explicit knowledge about one perceptual organization in the first half of the experiment to when they had explicit knowledge of both in the second half. We hypothesized that knowledge would modify the brain response to the alternative percept of the bistable sequence. However, that did not occur. When participants were performing one task, with no explicit knowledge of the bistable structure of the sequence, both integrated and segregated percepts were represented in auditory working memory. This demonstrates that explicit knowledge about the sounds is not a necessary factor for deriving and maintaining representations of multiple sound organizations within a complex sound environment. Passive attention operates in parallel with active or selective attention to maintain consistent representations of the environment, representations that may or may not be useful for task performance. It suggests a highly adaptive system useful in everyday listening situations where the listener has no prior knowledge about how the sound environment is structured.
© 2021 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; auditory perception; bistable stimuli; event-related potentials; mismatch negativity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34110020      PMCID: PMC9248873          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.348


  42 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted.

Authors:  R Näätänen; A W Gaillard; S Mäntysalo
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1978-07

7.  Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception.

Authors:  Nima Mesgarani; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Albert S Bregman; Wei-Wei Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Suppression of competing speech through entrainment of cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Auditory scene analysis: the sweet music of ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel Pressnitzer; Clara Suied; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.