Literature DB >> 25279983

Biased gene conversion skews allele frequencies in human populations, increasing the disease burden of recessive alleles.

Joseph Lachance1, Sarah A Tishkoff2.   

Abstract

Gene conversion results in the nonreciprocal transfer of genetic information between two recombining sequences, and there is evidence that this process is biased toward G and C alleles. However, the strength of GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) in human populations and its effects on hereditary disease have yet to be assessed on a genomic scale. Using high-coverage whole-genome sequences of African hunter-gatherers, agricultural populations, and primate outgroups, we quantified the effects of GC-biased gene conversion on population genomic data sets. We find that genetic distances (FST and population branch statistics) are modified by gBGC. In addition, the site frequency spectrum is left-shifted when ancestral alleles are favored by gBGC and right-shifted when derived alleles are favored by gBGC. Allele frequency shifts due to gBGC mimic the effects of natural selection. As expected, these effects are strongest in high-recombination regions of the human genome. By comparing the relative rates of fixation of unbiased and biased sites, the strength of gene conversion was estimated to be on the order of Nb ≈ 0.05 to 0.09. We also find that derived alleles favored by gBGC are much more likely to be homozygous than derived alleles at unbiased SNPs (+42.2% to 62.8%). This results in a curse of the converted, whereby gBGC causes substantial increases in hereditary disease risks. Taken together, our findings reveal that GC-biased gene conversion has important population genetic and public health implications.
Copyright © 2014 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25279983      PMCID: PMC4185123          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  56 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Yun-Xin Fu; Suhua Shi; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  SNP ascertainment bias in population genetic analyses: why it is important, and how to correct it.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; Sarah A Tishkoff
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Evolutionary diagnosis method for variants in personal exomes.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Maxwell Sanderford; Vanessa E Gray; Jieping Ye; Li Liu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes.

Authors:  Laurent Duret; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  A systematic survey of loss-of-function variants in human protein-coding genes.

Authors:  Daniel G MacArthur; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Adam Frankish; Ni Huang; James Morris; Klaudia Walter; Luke Jostins; Lukas Habegger; Joseph K Pickrell; Stephen B Montgomery; Cornelis A Albers; Zhengdong D Zhang; Donald F Conrad; Gerton Lunter; Hancheng Zheng; Qasim Ayub; Mark A DePristo; Eric Banks; Min Hu; Robert E Handsaker; Jeffrey A Rosenfeld; Menachem Fromer; Mike Jin; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Ekta Khurana; Kai Ye; Mike Kay; Gary Ian Saunders; Marie-Marthe Suner; Toby Hunt; If H A Barnes; Clara Amid; Denise R Carvalho-Silva; Alexandra H Bignell; Catherine Snow; Bryndis Yngvadottir; Suzannah Bumpstead; David N Cooper; Yali Xue; Irene Gallego Romero; Jun Wang; Yingrui Li; Richard A Gibbs; Steven A McCarroll; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Jonathan K Pritchard; Jeffrey C Barrett; Jennifer Harrow; Matthew E Hurles; Mark B Gerstein; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Ongoing GC-biased evolution is widespread in the human genome and enriched near recombination hot spots.

Authors:  Sol Katzman; John A Capra; David Haussler; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Clinical implications of human population differences in genome-wide rates of functional genotypes.

Authors:  Ali Torkamani; Phillip Pham; Ondrej Libiger; Vikas Bansal; Guangfa Zhang; Ashley A Scott-Van Zeeland; Ryan Tewhey; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome.

Authors:  Laurent Duret; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  31 in total

1.  Recombination in diverse maize is stable, predictable, and associated with genetic load.

Authors:  Eli Rodgers-Melnick; Peter J Bradbury; Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Charlotte B Acharya; Sharon E Mitchell; Chunhui Li; Yongxiang Li; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Open chromatin reveals the functional maize genome.

Authors:  Eli Rodgers-Melnick; Daniel L Vera; Hank W Bass; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes.

Authors:  Brenna M Henn; Laura R Botigué; Stephan Peischl; Isabelle Dupanloup; Mikhail Lipatov; Brian K Maples; Alicia R Martin; Shaila Musharoff; Howard Cann; Michael P Snyder; Laurent Excoffier; Jeffrey M Kidd; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The evolution of the human genome.

Authors:  Corinne N Simonti; John A Capra
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 5.  The impact of recombination on human mutation load and disease.

Authors:  Isabel Alves; Armande Ang Houle; Julie G Hussin; Philip Awadalla
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Biased Gene Conversion Constrains Adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Tuomas Hämälä; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Germline Stem Cell Competition, Mutation Hot Spots, Genetic Disorders, and Older Fathers.

Authors:  Norman Arnheim; Peter Calabrese
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 8.929

8.  Population dynamics of GC-changing mutations in humans and great apes.

Authors:  Juraj Bergman; Mikkel Heide Schierup
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Extreme recombination frequencies shape genome variation and evolution in the honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Andreas Wallberg; Sylvain Glémin; Matthew T Webster
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Hotspots of Human Mutation.

Authors:  Alex V Nesta; Denisse Tafur; Christine R Beck
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 11.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.