Literature DB >> 29438603

From Early Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis to Joint Arthroplasty: Determinants of Structural Progression and Symptoms.

Frank W Roemer1, C Kent Kwoh2, Tomoko Fujii3, Michael J Hannon4, Robert M Boudreau3, David J Hunter5, Felix Eckstein6, Markus R John7, Ali Guermazi8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess structural progression in knees with no/mild radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) (i.e., Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grades 0-2) that will undergo knee replacement during a 5-year period; to assess differences in structural damage on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in knees with no/mild radiographic OA versus those with severe radiographic OA (i.e., K/L grades 3 and 4) at baseline; and to assess differences in pain levels between those groups.
METHODS: All participants who underwent knee replacement from baseline to 60 months were drawn from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. MRIs were assessed for bone marrow lesions (BMLs), Hoffa synovitis, and effusion synovitis (i.e., hyperintensity signal changes in the fat pad and abnormal amount of capsular distension due to intraarticular joint fluid and/or synovial thickening) at baseline and at the time point before knee replacement (T0). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain were used for pain characterization. WOMAC activities of daily living and KOOS quality of life were applied to characterize functional status of the included participants. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of no/mild radiographic OA with these MRI features and pain.
RESULTS: Based on inclusion criteria, 181 knees were selected. Participants were predominantly female (57.8%) with a mean age of 64.4 years. A total of 51 knees (28.2%) had no/mild radiographic OA at baseline. Of these, 51.0% progressed to severe radiographic OA. No/mild radiographic OA knees showed higher odds of BMLs in the patellofemoral joint at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 7.92 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.45-18.16]) and T0 (OR 9.44 [95% CI 4.00-22.28]) compared to severe radiographic OA knees. In addition, no/mild radiographic OA knees were associated with change from no pain to pain from baseline to T0 (adjusted OR 5.48 [95% CI 1.25-24.00]).
CONCLUSION: More than half of the knees with no/mild radiographic OA before knee replacement progressed to severe radiographic OA during 4 years of follow-up. BMLs in the patellofemoral joint were more often seen among knees that had no/mild radiographic OA. Worsening pain status may contribute to knee replacement in knees with no/mild radiographic OA.
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29438603      PMCID: PMC6089673          DOI: 10.1002/acr.23545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  32 in total

1.  Assessment of synovitis with contrast-enhanced MRI using a whole-joint semiquantitative scoring system in people with, or at high risk of, knee osteoarthritis: the MOST study.

Authors:  Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Daichi Hayashi; Michel D Crema; Jingbo Niu; Yuqing Zhang; Monica D Marra; Avinash Katur; John A Lynch; George Y El-Khoury; Kristin Baker; Laura B Hughes; Michael C Nevitt; David T Felson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Y Sun; T Stürmer; K P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Measurement properties of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara Gandek
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes.

Authors:  J S Lawrence; J M Bremner; F Bier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice.

Authors:  Johannes W J Bijlsma; Francis Berenbaum; Floris P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Progression of osteoarthritis as a state of inertia.

Authors:  David Felson; Jingbo Niu; Burton Sack; Piran Aliabadi; Charles McCullough; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis: risk factors for MR-depicted fast cartilage loss over a 30-month period in the multicenter osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; John A Lynch; Michel D Crema; Monica D Marra; Michael C Nevitt; David T Felson; Laura B Hughes; George Y El-Khoury; Martin Englund; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Semiquantitative Imaging Biomarkers of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: Data From the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium.

Authors:  Jamie E Collins; Elena Losina; Michael C Nevitt; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; John A Lynch; Jeffrey N Katz; C Kent Kwoh; Virginia B Kraus; David J Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 10.  Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!).

Authors:  F Berenbaum
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  6 in total

1.  Subchondral tibial bone texture of conventional X-rays predicts total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ahmad Almhdie-Imjabbar; Hechmi Toumi; Khaled Harrar; Antonio Pinti; Eric Lespessailles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Identification of early prognostic factors for knee and hip arthroplasty; a long-term follow-up of the CHECK cohort.

Authors:  Danial Zarringam; Daniel B F Saris; Joris E J Bekkers
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

3.  Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures for the occurrence of total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tianyu Chen; Weiyu Han; Yujin Tang; Changhai Ding
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 4.  Chondroprotective Factors in Osteoarthritis: a Joint Affair.

Authors:  Jolet Y Mimpen; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Viscoelasticity and histology of the human cartilage in healthy and degenerated conditions of the knee.

Authors:  Michael Seidenstuecker; Julius Watrinet; Anke Bernstein; Norbert P Suedkamp; Sergio H Latorre; Anastasija Maks; Hermann O Mayr
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Biomarkers in Painful Symptomatic Knee OA Demonstrate That MRI Assessed Joint Damage and Type II Collagen Degradation Products Are Linked to Disease Progression.

Authors:  Nidhi Sofat; Vivian Ejindu; Christine Heron; Abiola Harrison; Soraya Koushesh; Lena Assi; Anasuya Kuttapitiya; Guy S Whitley; Franklyn A Howe
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.