Literature DB >> 25279255

Professionalism in court: The neurologist as expert witness.

William P Cheshire1, John C Hutchins1.   

Abstract

Serving as an expert witness can be a rewarding experience. It affords the neurologist the opportunity to contribute expertise to the legal system's pursuit of justice and benefits the public interest. However, serving as an expert witness without understanding and incorporating relevant professional and specialty guidelines concerning expert witness testimony can place the neurologist at risk. The American Academy of Neurology has established standards governing expert witness testimony and a disciplinary process to respond to complaints of violation of its standards. Increased understanding of and adherence to these qualifications and guidelines, coupled with an awareness of how the legal system differs from clinical practice, will better equip neurologists serving as expert witnesses and minimize their professional risk when doing so.

Year:  2014        PMID: 25279255      PMCID: PMC4160444          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  11 in total

1.  Medical malpractice.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Upholding professionalism: the disciplinary process of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  John C Hutchins; Murray G Sagsveen; Dan Larriviere
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  American Academy of Neurology policy on expert medical testimony.

Authors:  Murray G Sagsveen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  The neurologist as expert witness.

Authors:  H Richard Beresford; Michael A Williams; Murray G Sagsveen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.

Authors:  M A Williams; G A Mackin; H R Beresford; J Gordon; P L Jacobson; M P McQuillen; T E Reimschisel; R M Taylor; J L Bernat; M Rizzo; R D Snyder; M G Sagsveen; M Amery; W L Brannon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Neuroscientists in court.

Authors:  Owen D Jones; Anthony D Wagner; David L Faigman; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Regulating physician expert witness testimony.

Authors:  Dan Larriviere; Michael A Williams; Murray Sagsveen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass.

Authors:  James C Johnston; Thomas P Sartwelle
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Medical legal consultation in neurologic practice.

Authors:  Jonathan H Woodcock
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2014-08

10.  The American Academy of Neurology Code of Professional Conduct.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

1.  Expert Witness Training for Geriatric Medicine Fellows Using Courtroom Simulation.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Michael J Ferency; Erin M Sarzynski
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2017-08-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.