Literature DB >> 24026114

Neuroscientists in court.

Owen D Jones1, Anthony D Wagner, David L Faigman, Marcus E Raichle.   

Abstract

Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate inferences. The growing role of neuroscientists in court means that neuroscientists should be aware of important differences between the scientific and legal fields, and, especially, how scientific facts can be easily misunderstood by non-scientists, including judges and jurors.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026114     DOI: 10.1038/nrn3585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci        ISSN: 1471-003X            Impact factor:   34.870


  11 in total

1.  Providing expert witness testimony.

Authors:  Alan M Scarrow; Meera R Scarrow
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2002-04

Review 2.  The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement.

Authors:  Joshua W Buckholtz; René Marois
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states.

Authors:  Teneille Brown; Emily Murphy
Journal:  Stanford Law Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  Science in court: head case.

Authors:  Virginia Hughes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system.

Authors:  Robert M Sapolsky
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations.

Authors:  Deena Skolnick Weisberg; Frank C Keil; Joshua Goodstein; Elizabeth Rawson; Jeremy R Gray
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience.

Authors:  Eyal Aharoni; Chadd Funk; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong; Michael Gazzaniga
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  The law and neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.

Authors:  N J Schweitzer; Michael J Saks
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2011-07-10

10.  Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Applications of neuroscience in criminal law: legal and methodological issues.

Authors:  John B Meixner
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Elizabeth A Phelps; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Professionalism in court: The neurologist as expert witness.

Authors:  William P Cheshire; John C Hutchins
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  The forensic use of behavioral genetics in criminal proceedings: Case of the MAOA-L genotype.

Authors:  Sally McSwiggan; Bernice Elger; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-04

5.  Culture, neuroscience, and law.

Authors:  Gerardo Salvato; Roy Dings; Lucia Reuter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-22

Review 6.  Integrating Brain Science and Law: Neuroscientific Evidence and Legal Perspectives on Protecting Individual Liberties.

Authors:  Calvin J Kraft; James Giordano
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  At risk of being risky: The relationship between "brain age" under emotional states and risk preference.

Authors:  Marc D Rudolph; Oscar Miranda-Domínguez; Alexandra O Cohen; Kaitlyn Breiner; Laurence Steinberg; Richard J Bonnie; Elizabeth S Scott; Kim Taylor-Thompson; Jason Chein; Karla C Fettich; Jennifer A Richeson; Danielle V Dellarco; Adriana Galván; B J Casey; Damien A Fair
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  Three Research Strategies of Neuroscience and the Future of Legal Imaging Evidence.

Authors:  Jinkwon Jun; Soyoung Yoo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  The charm of structural neuroimaging in insanity evaluations: guidelines to avoid misinterpretation of the findings.

Authors:  C Scarpazza; S Ferracuti; A Miolla; G Sartori
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 6.222

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.