Literature DB >> 23504251

The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass.

James C Johnston1, Thomas P Sartwelle.   

Abstract

Neurologists have professional, ethical, and social obligations to ensure that expert witness testimony is reliable, objective, and truthful. In the past, an absence of professional regulatory oversight combined with immunity from civil litigation allowed the partisan expert to flourish. This is no longer the case. The expert witness unquestionably faces an increasingly perilous liability climate, and must be cognizant of the legal rules and procedures. The authors provide guidelines with risk management strategies for the neurologist serving as an expert witness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504251     DOI: 10.1177/0883073813479669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Neurol        ISSN: 0883-0738            Impact factor:   1.987


  4 in total

1.  Professionalism in court: The neurologist as expert witness.

Authors:  William P Cheshire; John C Hutchins
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2014-08

2.  Perpetuating Myths, Fables, and Fairy Tales: A Half Century of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas P Sartwelle; James C Johnston; Berna Arda
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2015-11-20

3.  Controlling Legal Risk for Effective Hospital Management.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Park; Duk Young Cho; Yong Sug Park; Sun Wook Kim; Jae-Hong Park; Nam Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 4.  Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring during Labor: A Critique and a Reply to Contemporary Proponents.

Authors:  Thomas P Sartwelle; James C Johnston
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2018-03-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.